تحلیل سلسله مراتبی شاخص های مؤثر بر کاربر در محیط‌های آموزشی طراحی شده براساس الگوهای بیوفیلیک (زیست گرایی)

عصارزادگان, محمد; خدابخشیان, مقدی

doi:10.22061/tej.2024.10212.2963

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، واحد اصفهان( خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2024.10212.2963

چکیده

پیشینه و اهداف: اتصال محکم زندگی انسان و طبیعت به‌عنوان عنصر ذاتی و فطری است. طبیعت تجلی‌گاه احساسات، شور، شعف و زیبایی‌ها است. به همین دلیل، انسان همواره می‌کوشد تا با آن همراه باشد. این نوع همراهی و همزیستی با طبیعت را به‌خوبی می‌توان در معماری دید. معماری بیوفیلیک ( زیست گرایی)، یکی از رویکردهای جدید در معماری امروز است که در پی طراحی بناها با استفاده از عناصر طبیعت شکل می‌گیرد. طراحی بیوفیلیک( زیست گرایی)، در واقع تلاشی است برای از بین بردن شکافی که بین معماری امروز و نیاز انسان‌ها به برقراری ارتباط با جهان طبیعی به‌وجود آمده و یک رویکرد ابتکاری است که بر اهمیت ترمیم و نگهداری از تجربه سودمند و استفاده از طبیعت در محیط ساخته شده تأکید می‌کند. پژوهش حاضر به تحلیل سلسله مراتبی شاخص‌های مؤثر بر کاربر در محیط‌های آموزشی طراحی شده براساس الگوهای بیوفیلیک( زیست گرایی) پرداخته است.
روش‌ها‌: پژوهش حاضر، کاربردی توصیفی- تحلیلی است و از طریق کتابخانه‌ای به مطالعه کاربرد 14 الگوی بیوفیلیک (زیست گرایی) در تعداد 8 نمونه موردی محیط آموزشی مرتبط با طبیعت در اقلیم گرم و مرطوب که بیشترین امکان استفاده از طبیعت را به‌دلیل شرایط موجود مهیا می‌نماید، پرداخته است. شاخص‌های چهارگانه فیزیولوژیکی، روانشناسی، شناختی و اجتماعی معنوی براساس نظر خبرگان اولویت‌بندی شدند و اعداد ده الگوی بصری از 14 الگوی بیوفیلیک(زیست گرایی) در این چهار شاخص دسته‌بندی گشتند و سپس، براساس الگوهای به‌کار رفته در هر یک از محیط‌های آموزشی تأثیرگذاری آن بر کاربر در زمینه‌های چهارگانه اولویت‌بندی شد. برای انتخاب شاخص‌های نهایی جهت ارزیابی و اولویت‌بندی محیط‌های آموزشی مورد مطالعه، پرسش‌نامه‌ای با طیف لیکرت طراحی و با روش گلوله برفی شناسایی و جمع‌آوری شد. برای وزن‌دهی و اولویت‌بندی شاخص‌ها از مقایسات زوجی در قالب پرسش‌نامه ساعتی 9 تایی استفاده شد. در تحقیق حاضر، به جهت مواجه بودن با معیارهای کیفی از روش فرایند سلسله مراتب تحلیل(AHP) استفاده شده است.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها، نشان داد که اولویت شاخص‌ها در محیط آموزشی به‌ترتیب فیزیولوژیکی، روانشناسی، شناختی و اجتماعی معنوی است و بیشترین اثرگذاری بر کاربر، مطابق الگوهای به‌کار رفته از شاخص‌های چهارگانه در فیزیولوژیکی و روانشناسی و شناختی «محیط آموزشی گرین و بارن کلونگ» بیشترین اثر بر کاربر را داشته‌اند. بررسی الگوهای به‌کار رفته در این نمونه‌ها نشان داد که محیط آموزشی کنزینگتون در مجموع بیشترین شاخص‌ها و معیارهای بیوفیلیک (زیست گرایی) را رعایت نموده و رعایت این شاخص‌ها در محیط آموزشی ووترنگ‌نیا در کمترین میزان خود است.
نتیجه‌گیری: توجه به اثرگذاری هریک از الگوهای بیوفیلیک(زیست گرایی) در یک یا چند شاخص از شاخص‌های چهارگانه می‌توان با استفاده هدفمند از این الگوها در محیط آموزشی، اثر یکی از شاخص‌های فیزیولوژیکی، روانشناسی، شناختی و اجتماعی معنوی را بر کاربر بیشتر نمود و محیط اثرگذار در یکی از شاخص‌ها براساس اولویت ارائه داد. استفاده هدفمند الگوهای بیوفیلیک( زیست گرایی) براساس شاخص‌های چهارگانه، سبب بهبود عملکرد آموزشی در زمینه‌های گوناگون می‌گردد و افراد را نسبت به محیط آموزشی علاقمند نموده و منجر به افزایش یادگیری و پیشرفت تحصیلی می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

محیط های یادگیری مبتنی بر فناوری

عنوان مقاله [English]

Hierarchical Analysis of Indicators Affecting the User in Educational Environments Designed Based on Biophilic Patterns

نویسندگان [English]

M. Assarzadegan
M. Khodabakhshian

MA. In Architecture, Department of Architecture, Isfahan(Khorasgan)Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: Human life and nature are tightly connected as an innate element. Nature is the manifestation of emotions, passion and beauty. For this reason, man always tries to be with it. This type of companionship and coexistence with nature can be well seen in architecture. Biophilic architecture is one of the new approaches in today's architecture, which follows the design of buildings using elements of nature. Biophilic design is actually an attempt to eliminate the gap between today's architecture and the need of humans to communicate with the natural world and is an innovative approach, which is based on the importance of restoring and maintaining the beneficial experience and use of nature in the built environment. The present research analyzed the hierarchical structure of indicators affecting the user in educational environments designed based on biophilic patterns.
Methods: The current research is a descriptive-analytical application, and through a library, it studied the use of 14 biophilic patterns in 8 case examples of nature-related educational environments in a hot and humid climate, which provides the greatest possibility of using nature due to the existing conditions. The four indicators of physiological, psychological, cognitive and socio-spiritual were prioritized based on the opinion of experts and the numbers of ten visual patterns out of 14 biophilic patterns were categorized in these four indicators and then based on the patterns used in each educational environment. Its impact on the user was prioritized in four areas. To select the final indicators for evaluating and prioritizing the studied educational environments, a questionnaire was designed with a Likert scale and was identified and collected using the snowball method. For weighting and prioritizing indicators, pairwise comparisons were used in the form of a 9-hour questionnaire. In this research, in order to meet the qualitative criteria, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used.
Findings: The findings showed that the priority of the indicators in the educational environment is physiological, psychological, cognitive and socio-spiritual respectively, and the most impact on the user, according to the patterns used from the four indicators in the physiological, psychological and cognitive "educational environment of Green and "Barn Klong" had the greatest effect on the user. Examining the patterns used in these samples showed that the educational environment of Kensington generally observed the most biophilic indicators and criteria, and the observation of these indicators in the educational environment of Waterengnia was the lowest.
Conclusion: Paying attention to the effect of each of the biophilic patterns on one or more indicators of the four indicators, with the aim of using these patterns in the educational environment, the effect of one of the physiological, psychological, cognitive and social spiritual indicators can be made more visible on the user. The use of target biophilic patterns based on the four indicators improves educational performance in various fields and makes people interested in the educational environment and increases academic progress.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Biophilic Design
Biophilia Patterns
Educational Environments
User

COPYRIGHTS
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

مراجع

[1] Mahdinejad J, Zarghami I, Sadat S. A. The Relationship between Human & Nature in Iranian Paradise from Islamic Architecture Viewpoint. Naqshejahan.2015; 5 (1) :27-41. [In Persian]

[2] Schiebel T, Gallinat J, Kühn S. Testing the Biophilia theory: Automatic approach tendencies towards nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2022. Feb 1;79: 101725 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101725

[3] Farokhzad M & Modiri dovom I. An investi gation of The Open Spaces design principles with Regard to the Iranian urban development and architectural background, Journal: Journal of Studies on Iranian IslamicCity.2014; vol1(16): 81-95 [In Persian]

[4] Lin B B, Egerer M. H, & Ossola A. Urban gardens as a space to engender biophilia: evidence and ways forward. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2018; 4, 79.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00079

[5] Mahmoudinejad H. Organic Architecture: Nature and Sustainability: Tahan Publications, first edition, 168 pages; 2018. [In Persian]

[6] Abdelaal M.S. Biophilic campus: an emerging planning approach for a sustainable innovation-conducive university. Journal of Cleaner Production.2019; 1445-1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.185

[7] Berto R, Barbiero G, Barbiero P & Senes G. An individual’s connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments. Some observations about biophilia. Behavioral Sciences.2018; 8(3), 34.

https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8030034

[8] Sanchez J. A, Ikaga T & Sanchez S. V. Quantitative improvement in workplace performance through biophilic design: A pilot experiment case study. Energy and Buildings. 2018; 177, 316-328.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.065

[9] Parsaee M, Demers C. M, Hébert M, Lalonde J. F & Potvin A. Biophilic, photobiological and energy-efficient design framework of adaptive building façades for Northern Canada. Indoor and Built Environment.2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20903082

[10] Xue F, Lau S. S, Gou Z, Song Y & Jiang B. Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2019; 76, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.004

[11] Söderlund J. The Emergence of a New Social Movement: Biophilic Design. In The Emergence of Biophilic Design (pp. 1-11). Springer, Cham;2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29813-5_1

[12] Shabak M, Norouzi N, Abdullah A. M & Khan T. H. Children's sense of attachment to the residential common open space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.2015; 201, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.413

[13] Izd Panah S, Pejohan Far M & Sardashti S. creative learning environments with the aim of improving the quality level of educational spaces and providing solutions to increase the efficiency of students in educational environments, Conference on Civil & Architecture Engineering & Urban Sustainble Management.2013. [In Persian]

[14] Mohammadi S. the effect of educational environment on students' learning, 1st International Conference on Educational Sciences, Psychology and Humanities, 2021. [In Persian]

[15] shahvarpoor Najaf Abadi D. A reflection on the position of the physical space of education on the increase of students, 4Interdisciplinary Research Conference in Engineering& Management science, Tehran (4),2022. [In Persian]

[16] Aristizabal S, Byun K, Porter P, Clements, N, Campanella C, Li L., ... & Bauer B. Biophilic office design: Exploring the impact of a multisensory approach on human well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology.2021; 77, 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101682

[17] MeidenbauerK. L, Stenfors C. U, Bratman G. N, Gross J. J, Schertz K. E, Choe K. W, & Berman M. G. The affective benefits of nature exposure: What's nature got to do with it? Journal of environmental psychology.2020; 72, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101498

[18] Almusaed A, Almssad A & Najar K. An Innovative School Design Based on a Biophilic Approach Using the Appreciative Inquiry Model: Case Study Scandinavia. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8545787

[19] Guzzo R.F, Suess C. and Legendre T.S. "Biophilic design for urban hotels – prospective hospitality employees’ perspectives", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2021-1322

[20] WijesooriyaN, & Brambilla A. Bridging biophilic design and environmentally sustainable design: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;283, 124591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124591

[21] Bolten B & Barbiero G. Biophilic Design: How to enhance physical and psychological health and wellbeing in our built environments. Visions for Sustainability.2020. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/3829

[22] Purani K & Kumar D. S. Exploring restorative potential of biophilic servicescapes. Journal of Services Marketing.2018; Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 414-429.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2017-0101

[23] Ramzy N. S. Biophilic qualities of historical architecture: In quest of the timeless terminologies of ‘life’in architectural expression. Sustainable Cities and Society.2015; 15, 42-56.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.11.006

[24] Tayyah S, Mehdizadeh Saradj F & Mahmoodi M. Developing a Nature-Inspired Model of Creativity in Architectural Design for Novice Learners. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar.2021; 18(100), 91-108.

[25] Norozi Yami N & Moradpur R. The biophilic design process of a girls' college, with an emphasis on reducing students' stress. 8th National Conference on Applied Research in Civil Engineering. Architecture and Urban Management, Tehran, 2021.

[26] Akbari Balderlou S & Attarkoche Baghi N. the impact of biophilic architecture on mental health and people's behavior towards environmental protection, 3rd International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning.Tehran,2019. [In Persian]

[27] Rajabipour F & Delshad siahkali M. An exploration on the responsibility to social adequacy in adolescent learning environments affected by the type of design experience based on the biophilic attitude. Technoology of Education journal.2020; vol3 (55): 723-738. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4655.2097

[28] Qurbani Param M R, Bawar S & Mahmoudinejad H. Evaluation of the effect of biophilic architectural principles on the quality of housing design in the northern region of Iran (Case study: Gorgan city, new attitudes in human geography quarterly).2019; 12 (2), 46: 405-424.

[29] O’Connor M. L. Exploring the role of sensory perception in the architectural design of healing spaces: an embodied cognition approach to understanding trauma recovery through biophilic design.2020.

[30] Lee H. C & Park S. J. Assessment of importance and characteristics of biophilic design patterns in a children’s library. Sustainability. 2018; 10(4), 987.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040987

[31] Yin J, Yuan J, Arfaei N, Catalano P. J, Allen J. G & Spengler J. D. Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International.2020; 136, 105427.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427

[32] Brielmann A.A, Buras N.H, Salingaros N.A, Taylor R.P. What Happens in Your Brain When You Walk Down the Street? Implications of Architectural Proportions, Biophilia, and Fractal Geometry for Urban Science. Urban Science.2022; 7;6(1):3.

https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010003

[33] Kellert S. R. Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. 2008; 3-19.

[34] Downton P, Jones, D., Zeunert J & Roös P. Biophilic design applications: putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. KnE Engineering.2017; 59-65. https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v2i2.596

[35] Kellert S R. “Biophilic for Life”, Island Press, Washington.2005.

[36] Kellert S, Heerwagen J, Mador M. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life; JohnWiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013.

[37] Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. 14 Patterns of biophilic design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC,2014.

[38] Hildebrand G. Biophilic architectural space. Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 2008.263-275.

[39] Honga W.A, Hanb L.I, Yun-onc T.O. Foster a Healthy Community Through Active Design and Biophilic Design. World Sustainable Built Environment,2017.

[40] Amador de San José, C. (2019).

[41] Zhong W, Schröder T, Bekkering J. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research.2022; 11(1): 114-141.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

[42] Heerwagen J, Hase B. Building biophilia: Connecting people to nature in building design. Environmental Design and Construction.2001; 30-36.

[43] Heerwagen J, Gregory B. Biophilia and sensory aesthetics. Biophilic Design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 2008;227-242.

[44] Cramer, Jenifer Seal and Browning, Dee Browning. Transforming building practices through biophilic design. In: Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. 2008;335-346.

[45] Kellert S, Calabrese E. The practice of biophilic design. London: Terrapin Bright LLC. 2015; 3-21.

[46] Xue F, Lau SS, Gou Z, Song Y, Jiang B. Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2019; 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.004

[47] Browning W.D, Ryan C.O. Nature inside: a biophilic design guide. Routledge.2020.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003033011

[48] karimi M, Samanian K, Samanian S. Assessing and Designing a Generic Learning Evaluation Model from Art and Historical Museums Based on GLOs Model, Journal of visual & applied arts.2015; 7 (14): 107-121. [In Persian]

[49] Shoari N, Ezzati M, DoyleY G, Wolfe I, Brauer M, Bennett J & Fecht D. Nowhere to play: available open and green space in Greater London schools. Journal of Urban Health. 2021; 98(3): 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-021-00527-0

[50] Kuo M, Barnes M, Jordan C. Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. High-Quality Outdoor Learning. 2022; 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2

[51] Roe J, Aspinall P. The restorative outcomes of forest school and conventional school in young people with good and poor behaviour. Urban forestry & urban greening. 2011; 10(3):205-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.003

[52] Determan J, Akers M. A, Albright T, Browning B, Martin-Dunlop C, Archibald P & Caruolo V. The impact of biophilic learning spaces on student success. Architecture Planning Interiors. Architecture Planning Interiors.2019.

[53] Elmashharawi A. Biophilic design for bringing educational spaces to life. Journal of Design Studio. 2019;1(1):16-21.

[54] Tabaeian S. M. The optimum design of open and green spaces in educational complex to improve student’s perception and quality of educational environment (Case study: Girls high schools in Isfahan). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism. 2021. 12(1): 127-139. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2020.214757.1339

[55] Requia W. J, & Adams M. D. Green areas and students’ academic performance in the Federal District, Brazil: An assessment of three greenness metrics. Environmental Research. 2022; 211, 113027.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113027

[56] Ghaziani R, Lemon M & Atmodiwirjo P. Biophilic Design Patterns for Primary Schools. Sustainability. 2021; 13(21) 12207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112207

[57] Charkas M. Experiential learning based biophilic design. Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ). 2020; 26(1), 4.

[58] Louv, R. Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Atlantic Books Ltd. London,2013.

[59] Keniger L. E, Gaston K. J , Irvine K. N & Fuller R. A. What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International journal of environmental research and public health.2013; 10(3): 913-935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913

[60] Kelz C, Evans G.W, Röderer K. The restorative effects of redesigning the schoolyard: A multi-methodological, quasi-experimental study in rural Austrian middle schools. Environment and Behavior. 2015; 47(2):119-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513510528

[61] Grafetstatter C , Gaisberger M , Prossegger J , Ritter M , Kolarz P , Pichler C , Thalhamer J , Hartl A. Does waterfall aerosol influence mucosal immunity and chronic stress? A randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Physiol. Anthr.2017; 36: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-016-0117-3

[62] Lee J. Y , Lee D.C. Cardiac and pulmonary benefits of forest walking versus city walking in elderly women: A randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Eur. J. Integr. Med.2014; 6: 5–11.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2013.10.006.

[63] Alvarsson J. J , Wiens S , Nilsson M.E. Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.2010; 7, 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031036

[64] Hansmann R , Hug S.M , Seeland K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban For Urban Green.2007; 6, 213–225.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004

[65] Chang K.G , Sullivan W.C , Lin Y.H , Su W , Chang C.Y. The effect of biodiversity on green space users’ wellbeing: An empirical investigation using physiological evidence. Sustain. 2016; 8(10): 1049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101049

[66] Colley K , Brown C , Montarzino A. Understanding knowledge workers’ interactions with workplace greenspace: Open space use and restoration experiences at urban-fringe business sites. Environ. Behav.2017; 49: 314–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516629194

[67] MacQuarrie S , Nugent C & Warden C. Learning with nature and learning from others: nature as setting and resource for early childhood education. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning.2015; 15(1): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2013.841095

[68] Eitland E , Klingensmith L , MacNaughton P , Cedeno Laurent J , Spengler J & Bernstein A. Schools for health; Foundations for student success: How school buildings influence student health, thinking, and performance. Retrieved from,2018.

[69] Pretty J, Peacock J , Sellens M , Griffin M. The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. Int. J. Env. Heal. Res.2005; 15: 319–337.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963

[70] Pretty J. How nature contributes to mental and physical health. Spirit. Health Int.2004; 5: 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/shi.220

[71] Kuo F.E , Sullivan W.C. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environ. Behav. 2001; 33: 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973124

[72] Wang X , Rodiek S , Wu C , Chen Y , Li Y. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban For. Urban Green.2016; 15: 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003

[73] Barton J , Pretty J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010; 44: 3947–3955. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r

[74] Windhager S , Atzwanger K , Bookstein F.L , Schaefer K. Fish in a mall aquarium: An ethological investigation of biophilia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011; 99: 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.008

[75] Tavakoli zadeh J. A study on the efficacy of teaching self-regulated learning strategies on mental health in boys studying in second grade of junior-high school in Mashhad, Journal of fundamentals of mental health.2011; 13(51):9-250. [In Persian]

[76] Nevzati F , DEMİRBAŞ O. O & HASIRCI D. Biophilic interior design: a case study on the relation between water elements and well-being of the users in an educational building. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2021; 11(2): 450-467. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1049023

[77] Lotf Ata AL. Effect of environmental factors on behaviors and learning, in educational spaces (Especially elementary schools), Urban management.2008; 6(21): 73-90. [In Persian]

[78] Bratman G.N, Hamilton J.P, Daily G.C. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York academy of sciences. 2012; 1249(1):118-36.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x

[79] Jeon J.Y, Yeon P.S, Shin W.S. The influence of indirect nature experience on human system. Forest Sci. Technol. 2018; 14: 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2017.1420701

[80] Boyle, M.E. Learning to neighbor? Service-learning in context. J. Acad. Ethics.2007; 5: 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9045-5

[81] Clayton S. Domesticated nature: Motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact. J. Environ. Psychol. 2007; 27: 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.001

[82] Han K. T. An exploration of relationships among the responses to natural scenes: scenic beauty, preference, and restoration. Environ. Behav.2010; 42: 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509333875

[83] Yin J , Zhu S , MacNaughton P , Allen J.G , Spengler J.D. Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Build. Environ. 2018; 132: 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.006

[84] Bowler D. E , Buyung-Ali L.M , Knight T.M , Pullin A.S. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10- 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456

[85] Abboushi B, Elzeyadi I, Taylor R & Sereno M. Fractals in architecture: The visual interest, preference and mood response to projected fractal light patterns in interior spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2019; 61: 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.005

[86] Peters T & D'Penna K. Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability. 2020; 12(17): 7064. https://doi:10.3390/su12177064

[87] Mott M. S, Robinson D. H, Williams-Black T. H & McClellandS. S. The supporting effects of high luminous conditions on grade 3 oral reading fluency scores. SpringerPlus.2014;3(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-53

[88] Söderlund J , & Newman P. Improving mental health in prisons through biophilic design. The Prison Journal. 2017; 97(6): 750-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517734516

[89] Seymour, V. The human–nature relationship and its impact on health: A critical review. Frontiers in public health.2016; 2 60. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00260

[90] Kingsley J , Townsend M. ‘Dig in’ to social capital: Community gardens as mechanisms for growing urban social connectedness. Urban Policy Res.2006; 24: 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140601035200

[91] Zelenski J.M, Nisbet E.K. Happiness and feeling connected. Environ. Behav.2012; 46(1): 3–23.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512451901

[92] Jirásek I , Veselský P , Poslt J. Winter outdoor trekking: Spiritual aspects of environmental education. Environ. Educ. Res. 2016; 23: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.114955

[93] Vo Trong Nghia’s Farming Kindergarten Has a Vegetable Garden on its Looping Roof. Available online: (accessed on 2 September 2021).

[94] Nanyang Technological University (NTU) School of Art, Design and Media (ADM), Greenroofs.com, LLC. (accessed 2023)

[95] EcoKid Kindergarten / LAVA" 17 Apr 2020. ArchDaily. (Accessed 7 Jan 2023)

[96] Shining Stars Kindergarten Bintaro / djuhara + djuhara" 24 Feb 2013. ArchDaily. (Accessed 7 Jan 2023).

[97] The Kensington Learning Space / Plan Architect" 26 Feb 2021. ArchDaily. (Accessed 7 Jan 2023)

نامه به سردبیر

سر دبیر نشریه فناوری آموزش، با تواضع انتشار نامه های واصله از نویسندگان و خوانندگان و بحث در سامانه نشریه را ظرف 3 ماه از تاریخ انتشار آنلاین مقاله در سامانه و یا قبل از انتشار چاپی نشریه، به منظور اصلاح و نظردهی امکان پذیر نموده است.، البته این شامل نقد در مورد تحقیقات اصلی مقاله نمی باشد.

توچه به موارد ذیل پیش از ارسال نامه به سردبیر لازم است در نظر گرفته شود:

[1]نامه هایی که شامل گزارش از آمار، واقعیت ها، تحقیقات یا نظریه ها هستند، لازم است همراه با منابع معتبر و مناسب باشند، اگرچه ارسال بیش از زمان 3 نامه توصیه نمی گردد

[2] نامه هایی که بجای انتقاد سازنده به ایده های تحقیق، مشتمل بر حملات شخصی به نویسنده باشند، توجه و چاپ نمی شود

[3] نامه ها نباید بیش از 300 کلمه باشد

[4] نویسندگان نامه لازم است در ابتدای نامه تمایل یا عدم تمایل خود را نسبت به چاپ نظریه ارسالی نسبت به یک مقاله خاص اعلام نمایند

[5] به نامه های ناشناس ترتیب اثر داده نمی شود

[6] شهر، کشور و محل سکونت نویسندگان نامه باید در نامه مشخص باشد.

[7] به منظور شفافیت بیشتر و محدودیت حجم نامه، ویرایش بر روی آن انجام می پذیرد.