فراتحلیل اثربخشی فناوری در پیشبرد اهداف آموزش ریاضی

علی دهی راوندی, راضیه; طاهرطلوع دل, محمدصادق

doi:10.22061/jte.2019.4891.2139

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

¹ دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران

² دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4891.2139

چکیده

پیشینه و اهداف: با توجه به این که قرن حاضر با نوآوری، سرعت و پیشرفتهایی در زمینه فناوری اطلاعات و انتقال دانش عجین شده است، نسل جدید در پی روشهایی است تا خود را با این تغییرات همگام سازد. بنابراین باید در محتوا و روش یادگیری اصلاحاتی انجام گیرد. یکی از روشهای نوین آموزشی، آموزش همراه با فناوری است. فناوری ابزاری است که توسط دانش بشری ایجاد شده تا همراه با منابع به تولید، حل مسئله و برآورده شدن نیازها یا خواستهها بپردازد. بنابراین میتوان فناوری آموزشی را به کارگیری فناوری جهت خلق و مدیریت منابع و فرایندهای فناورانه جهت بهبود عملکرد آموزشی با هدف ایجاد انگیزه و ترغیب دانشآموزان به یادگیری و تسهیل روند آموزش تلقی کرد. با توجه به پیشرفت سریع فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در عصر حاضر و در نتیجه افزایش قابل ملاحظه مطالعات مربوط به بررسی تأثیر فناوری در اثربخشی آموزش، پژوهش حاضر با هدف فراتحلیل و ترکیب نتایج پژوهشهای انجام یافته در زمینه بررسی تأثیر استفاده از فناوری در آموزش ریاضی انجام گرفته است.
روش ها جامعه پژوهشی، پژوهشهایی است که به بررسی تاثیر استفاده از فناوری در پیشبرد اهداف آموزش ریاضی پرداخته بودند و با بررسی پیشینه تعداد 19 پژوهش در این زمینه یافت گردید.
یافته‌ها: یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که استفاده از فناوری به میزان 0.38 از واریانس متغیر دستیابی به اهداف آموزش ریاضی را پیشبینی میکند بنابراین در صورتی که فناوری به طور کامل در روشهای تعلیم و تربیت ادغام شود میتواند به عنوان ابزاری موثر در بهبود یادگیری دانشآموزان در درس ریاضی عمل کند، لذا با توجه به اثربخشی استفاده از فناوری در آموزش ریاضی، ضروری است برنامههای درسی ریاضی به صورتی تدوین گردند که ارائه محتوا را با تلفیقی از فناوری همراه سازند.
نتیجه‌گیری: مطالعهی حاضر با هدف تلفیق نتایج کسب شده در خصوص تأثیر بهرهگیری از فناوری در پیشبرد اهداف آموزش ریاضی به روش فراتحلیل انجام پذیرفت. متغیر مستقل این پژوهش شامل: نرمافزارهای آموزشی، بازیهای رایانهای، چندرسانهایها، تصاویر گرافیکی و استفاده از کامپیوتر و متغیر وابسته: یادگیری، خودکارآمدی، انگیزش تحصیلی، عملکرد، کارکردهای اجرایی، پیشرفت، خودتنظیمی،یادداری، نگرش و مشارکت در درس ریاضی میباشد. با توجه به وجود همبستگی میان استفاده از فناوری و پیشبرد اهداف آموزش ریاضی توصیه میگردد برنامهریزان آموزشی در امر تدوین کتابهای درسی اهتمام لازم را مطابق این مورد به کار گیرند و روش‌های تدریس معلمان نیز متناسب با این موضوع و با استفاده از فناوری‌های جدید تغییر یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.20080441.1398.13.4.4.1

موضوعات

فناوری آموزش

عنوان مقاله [English]

A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of technology in advancing the goals of mathematics education

نویسندگان [English]

R. Alidehi Ravandi ¹
M. S. Taher Tolou Del ²

¹ Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Architecture & Urban Design, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background and Objective:Given that the current century is associated with innovation, speed and advances in information technology and knowledge transfer, the new generation is looking for ways to keep up with these changes. Therefore, improvements should be made in the content and method of learning. One of the new educational methods is education with technology. Technology is a tool created by human knowledge to produce, solve, and meet needs or wants with resources. Therefore, educational technology can be considered as the use of technology to create and manage technological resources and processes to improve educational performance with the aim of motivating and encouraging students to learn and facilitate the educational process. The present study was aimed at the meta-analysis and synthesis of the results of research on the impact of the use of technology in mathematical education considering the rapid progress of ICT in the present age and, consequently, the significant increase in studies on the impact of technology on the effectiveness of education.
Methods:The statistical community is a research that studies the impact of using technology in advancing the goals of mathematical education and with the review of the history, 19 studies were found in this field.
Findings: The research findings showed that the use of technology at 0.38 of variable variance predicts the achievement of the goals of mathematical education, so if technology can be fully integrated into teaching methods, it can be as an effective tool to improve students' learning in mathematics, therefore, considering the effectiveness of using technology in mathematical education, it is essential that the mathematical curriculum be formulated to bring content with a combination of technology.
Conclusion: The aim of this study was to integrate the results obtained regarding the effect of using technology in advancing the goals of mathematics education by meta-analysis. The independent variables of this research include: educational software, computer games, multimedia, graphic images and computer use; dependent variables were: learning, self-efficacy, academic motivation, performance, executive functions, progress, self-regulation, memorization, attitude and participation in math lessons. Due to the correlation between the use of technology and the advancement of the goals of mathematics education, it is recommended that educational planners take the necessary care in compiling textbooks accordingly, and teachers' teaching methods should be in line with this issue and modified by using new technologies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Meta-analysis
Effectiveness
Technology
Teaching Math

COPYRIGHTS
©2019 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

مراجع

[1] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. The National Council, Virginia, USA; 1989.

[2] Colbert JA, Boyd KE, Clark KA, Guan S, Harris JB, Kelly MA, Thompson AD. Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge; 2008.

[3] Bakırcı H, Bilgin AK, Simsek A. The effects of simulation technique and worksheets on formal operational stage in science and technology lessons. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;15: 1462-1469.

[4] Koong CS, Wu CY. The applicability of interactive item templates in varied knowledge types. Computers & Education. 2011; 56(3): 781-801.

[5] Li DD, Lim CP. Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers & Education. 2008; 50(4):1394-1410.

[6] Furio D, Juan MC, Seguí I, Vivo R. Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2015; 31(3): 189-201.

[7] Chauhan S. A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education. 2017; 105: 14-30.

[8] Ahmad K, Lily S. The effectiveness of computer applications: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on computing in Education. 1994; 27(1): 48-61.

[9] Andrews R, Freeman A, Hou D, McGuinn N, Robinson A, Zhu J. The effectiveness of information and communication technology on the learning of written English for 5 to 16 year olds. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2007; 38: 325-336.

[10] Torgerson CJ, Zhu D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in English, 5-16. In R. Andrews (Ed.), The impact of ICT on literacy education. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2003.

[11] Slavin RE, Cheung A, Groff C, Lake C. Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly. 2008; 43: 290-322.

[12] Slavin RE, Lake C, Chambers B, Cheung A, Davis S. Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research. 2009; 79: 1391.

[13] Archer K, Savage R, Sanghera-Sidhu S, Wood E, Gottardo A, Chen V. Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis. Computers & Education. 2014; 78: 140-149.

[14] Cheung AC, Slavin RE. The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 2013; 9: 88-113.

[15] Christmann EP, Badgett JL. A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on elementary students’ academic achievement. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual. 2003; 1: 91-104.

[16] Fletcher-Finn C, Gravatt B. The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1995; 12(3): 219-241.

[17] Kulik CLC, Kulik JA. Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior. 1991; 7(1): 75-94.

[18] Li Q, M X. A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review. 2010; 22(3): 215-243.

[19] Liao YKC. Effects of hypermedia versus traditional instruction on students’ achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 1998; 30(4): 341-359.

[20] Liao YKC. Effects of hypermedia on students’ achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 1999; 8(3): 255-277.

[21] Liao YKC. Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’ achievement in Taiwan: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education. 2007; 48(2): 216-233.

[22] Niemiec RP, Samson G, Weinstein T, Walberg HJ. The effects of computer based instruction in elementary schools: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 1987; 20(2): 85-103.

[23] Rakes CR, Valentine JC, McGatha MB, Ronau RN. Methods of instructional improvement in algebra a systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2010; 80(3): 372-400.

[24] Ryan AW. Meta-analysis of achievement effects of microcomputer applications in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. 1991; 27(2): 161-184.

[25] Slavin RE, Lake C. Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research. 2008; 78(3): 427-515.

[26] Sung YT, Chang KE, Liu TC. The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education. 2016; 94: 252-275.

[27] Safarian S, Fallah V, Mirhoseini SH. Comparing the educational effect with educational software and method Traditional teaching on learning mathematical lessons, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. 2011; 1(2). Persian.

[28] Zamani BE, Saeedi M, Saeedi A. Effectiveness and Sustainability of the Effect of Using Multimedia on Self-efficacy Educational motivation for math lessons, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. 2013; 2 (4): 67-87. Persian.

[29] Bavi A. The effect of education through multimedia software on math performance of male students in Tehran, Journal of Social Psychology. 2013; 8 (25): 55-69. Persian.

[30] Koohbanani S, Alizadeh H, Hashemi JH, Sarami GH, Koohbanani S. The Effectiveness of Computer Training Program on the Executive Functions of Students with Mental Disorders, Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2014; 11 (3): 208-218. Persian.

[31] Shahamat F, Kadivar P, Farzad V. Relationship between cognitive styles and students’ progress in mathematics and chemistry in a computer-based learning environment in comparison with the traditional environment, Studies in Education and Psychology. 2009; 9(1): 143-156. Persian.

[32] Zamani BE, Saeedi Z, Abedi A. Effectiveness and Sustainability of the Effect of Multimedia on Self-Regulation and Academic Performance of the First Year High School Mathematics, New Educational Approaches. 2012; 6 (2), 1-22. Persian.

[33] Shekhzadeh M, Mehrmohamadi M. Elementary mathematics education software based on constructivist approach and its effectiveness measurement, Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations. 2012; 3(9): 33-46. Persian.

[34] Norouzi D, Ahmadzadehbayani A, Aghabarati N. The effect of multimedia training on learning and memorization of mathematical lessons Autistic boy students, Quarterly of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2012; 1 (4): 23-50. Persian.

[35] Zarea H, Amini F. The Effectiveness of “Working Memory” Training Software on the Functions of Attention Students with Mental Disorders, Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2017; 6 (1): 60-79. Persian.

[36] Asare A, Zadshir M. The effect of computer-aided math education on the attitude of math students in class 9, Journal of Family and Research. 2017; 14 (35):49-64. Persian.

[37] Motamedi A, Barghiirani Z, Karimi B. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Methods of Direct Education, Computer Aided Learning and Combination on the Reduction of Problems in Students with Mental Disorders, Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2013; 2 (2): 76-100. Persian.

[38] Zameni F, Kardan S. The Influence of Information and Communication Technology in Learning Mathematical Lessons, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. 2011; 1(1): 23-38. Persian.

[39] Rastegarpour H, Yadolahi M. The Effect of Dynamic and Static Graphic Images on Geometry Learning, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. 2011; 1(2): 63-76. Persian.

[40] Jangizehishastan H, Zareazavaraki A, Niliahmadabadi M, Pezeshk SH, Delavar, A. Educational multimedia Effect on the amount of learning, motivation for academic achievementAnd the participation of mentally retarded students in math lessons. Communication Technology in Curriculum. 2017; 2(3): 15-28. Persian.

[41] Yavari M, Yaryari F, Rastegarpour H. Effectiveness of Educational Software “Student Account” on Dyscalculic Students’ Math Learning, Research on Exceptional Children. 2006; 6 (3): 713-734. Persian.

[42] Yaryari F, Afrooz GH, Mirmohamadi F. The study of the effect of basic education program (Omid) on primary school students with Down syndrome in Tehran, Research on Exceptional Children. 2010; 10 (1): 37-48. Persian.

[43] Zareazavaraki A, Gharibi F. The effect of multimedia training on the learning and memorization of students in grade 4 mental retardation in Arak, Quarterly of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2012; 2 (5): 1-20. Persian.

[44] Moradi R, Maleki H. The Effect of Computer-Aided Educational Computer Games on Student’s Math with Failure to Learn Math, Quarterly of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2015; 5 (18): 27-44. Persian.

[45] Aminifar A, Salehsedghpour B, Valinejhadtorkamani F. The role of technology in mathematical learning, Journal of Technology of Education. 2011; 5 (4): 265-272. Persian.

[46] Howitt D, Cramer D. Introduction to statistics in psychology. UK: Pearson; 2007.

[47] Pigott TD. Advances in Meta-Analysis, New York: Springer; 2012.

[48] Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions:a metaanalysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC public health. 2012; 13(1):119-126.

[49] Wolf FM. Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1986.

[50] Bassant KC. Factors associated with types of mathematics anxiety in college students. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education. 1995; 26: 327- 345.

[51] Yenilmez K, Girginer N, Uzun AO. Mathematics anxiety and attitude level of students of the faculty of economics and business administrator; The Turkey model. International Mathematical Forum. 2007; 2(41): 1997 – 2002.

[52] Aiken JR, Lewis R. The effect of attitudes on performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2007; 52(1): 19-24.

نامه به سردبیر

سر دبیر نشریه فناوری آموزش، با تواضع انتشار نامه های واصله از نویسندگان و خوانندگان و بحث در سامانه نشریه را ظرف 3 ماه از تاریخ انتشار آنلاین مقاله در سامانه و یا قبل از انتشار چاپی نشریه، به منظور اصلاح و نظردهی امکان پذیر نموده است.، البته این شامل نقد در مورد تحقیقات اصلی مقاله نمی باشد.

توچه به موارد ذیل پیش از ارسال نامه به سردبیر لازم است در نظر گرفته شود:

[1]نامه هایی که شامل گزارش از آمار، واقعیت ها، تحقیقات یا نظریه ها هستند، لازم است همراه با منابع معتبر و مناسب باشند، اگرچه ارسال بیش از زمان 3 نامه توصیه نمی گردد

[2] نامه هایی که بجای انتقاد سازنده به ایده های تحقیق، مشتمل بر حملات شخصی به نویسنده باشند، توجه و چاپ نمی شود

[3] نامه ها نباید بیش از 300 کلمه باشد

[4] نویسندگان نامه لازم است در ابتدای نامه تمایل یا عدم تمایل خود را نسبت به چاپ نظریه ارسالی نسبت به یک مقاله خاص اعلام نمایند

[5] به نامه های ناشناس ترتیب اثر داده نمی شود

[6] شهر، کشور و محل سکونت نویسندگان نامه باید در نامه مشخص باشد.

[7] به منظور شفافیت بیشتر و محدودیت حجم نامه، ویرایش بر روی آن انجام می پذیرد.