Assessment of students' perceptual readiness for e-learning in Iranian Universities

Farazkish, M.; Montazer, Gh.

doi:10.22061/tej.2020.6051.2324

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

M. Farazkish ¹
Gh. Montazer ²

¹ Department of Technology and Innovation Research, Institute For Trade Studies and Research, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Information Technology Engineering, School of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2020.6051.2324

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The current generation of academic learners is considered "digital natives" because of their ease of use and familiarity with networking technologies; However, there are ambiguities about the readiness of students to study in an e-learning environment. In particular, Iranian students' lack of motivation for e-learning, despite much infrastructure investment over the past two decades, has been a major challenge that has recently attracted the attention of higher education planners to e-learning readiness, especially from a perceptual perspective. This study investigated the perceptual readiness level of Iranian students for e-learning. Therefore, the current state of perceptual readiness of Iranian students to participate in the e-learning environment beyond the presumption of "existence" or "lack" of this preparation is such that their actual readiness is determined in a number of important universities.
Methods: This research is philosophically placed in the positivism paradigm and the logic of deductive reasoning is used. Its macro-targeting is applied, and the survey research strategy is used to collect first-hand data using a questionnaire tool. The survey data were collected between April 2018 and February 2019. In addition, two complementary approaches have been used to formulate and weigh the indicators and criteria for assessing students' e-learning readiness: first, the use of indicators and criteria developed in previous research, and second, and the use of subject matter experts in the country. The use of data from other researches makes it possible to compare the results with the findings of other researchers, and the use of expert opinion causes the localization of indicators and criteria with the requirements and context of higher education in the country. The students' perceptual readiness was measured by the following four scales: Attitude, Perceived usefulness, Willingness and Perceived self-efficacy; Then, the weight of each scale and measure will be calculated. Finally, based on the rating results, the students' perceptual readiness at the number of comprehensive universities and specialized universities will be estimated.
Findings: The average perceptual readiness of students for e-learning in 15 selected Iranian universities is 4.9 out of 10, which indicates the situation at the "average" level. Also, the findings show that about 35% of the students' readiness measures are below the "good" level, and the average of all readiness measures is at the "medium" level. Also, considering students' relative perceptual readiness for e-learning, especially in "perceived self-efficacy" and "attitudes" scales, the deans of universities should focus on the two main activities of "enhancing students' self-efficacy through e-learning" and "providing an appropriate e-learning environment”.
Conclusion: Considering the decrease in the number of e-learning Iranian students, the results of this study show that one of the important reasons for the failure of e-learning systems in Iranian universities can be students' lack of perceptual readiness. At the same time, considering the lower than average level of students' readiness in the "willingness" and "perceived usefulness" scales, there is a need to focus on awareness and education of students in this regard. Besides, relying on students 'relative readiness to understand self-efficacy and attitude indicators, universities should put two main activities on their agenda: 1) further strengthening students' self-efficacy through e-learning, and 2) providing a suitable environment. For e-learning for students.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1399.15.1.9.0

Main Subjects

E-Lerning

COPYRIGHTS
©2021 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon. 2001; 9(5): 1-6

[2] Parkes M, Stein S, Reading C. Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education. 2015; 25: 1-10.

[3] Margaryan A, Littlejohn A, Vojt G. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education. 2011; 56(2):429-40.

[4] Waugh MI, Su-Searle J. Student persistence and attrition in an online MS program: Implications for program design. International Journal on E-Learning. 2014; 13(1):101-21.

[5] Arif A. Learning from the web: Are students ready or not. Educational Technology & Society. 2001; 4(4):32-8.

[6] Prensky MH. Sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education. 2009; 5(3).

[7] Packham G, Jones P, Miller C, Thomas B. e‐learning and retention: Key factors influencing student withdrawal. Education+ Training. 2004.

[8] Sahin I, Shelley M. Considering students' perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2008; 11(3):216-23.

[9] Chen Y, Wang Y, Chen NS. Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education. 2014; 79:16-27.

[10] Yemma DM. Impacting learning for 21st century students: A phenomenological study of higher education faculty utilizing a flipped learning approach [doctoral dissertation] US: Robert Morris University; 2015.

[11] Hao Y, Lee KS. Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers' concerns. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 57:250-60.

[12] Al-Samarraie H, Selim H, Teo T, Zaqout F. Isolation and distinctiveness in the design of e-learning systems influence user preferences. Interactive Learning Environments. 2017; 25(4):452-66.

[13] Dray B J, Lowenthal P R, Miszkiewicz M J, Ruiz‐Primo M A, Marczynski K. Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education. 2011; 32(1): 29-47.

[14] Blankenship R, Atkinson JK. Undergraduate student online learning readiness. International Journal of Education Research. 2010; 5(2):44-54.

[15] Hung ML, Chou C, Chen CH, Own ZY. Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education. 2010; 55(3):1080-90.

[16] Atkinson JK, Blankenship R. Online learning readiness of undergraduate college students: A comparison between male and female learners. International Journal of Learning in Higher Education. 2009; 5(2): 49-56.

[17] Smith PJ. Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational psychology. 2005; 25(1):3-12.

[18] Bernard* RM, Brauer A, Abrami PC, Surkes M. The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education. 2004; 25(1):31-47.

[19] Watkins R, Leigh D, Triner D. Assessing readiness for e‐learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2004; 17(4):66-79.

[20] Smith PJ, Murphy KL, Mahoney SE. Towards identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: An exploratory study. Distance Education. 2003; 24(1):57-67.

[21] Watkins R. Readiness for online learning self-assessment. Annual-san diego-pfeiffer and company. 2003; 1:139-50.

[22] McVay M. Developing a web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the Ed. D. Program, Nova Southeastern University, Florida. 2000.

[23] Gay GH. An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2016; 28(2):199-220.

[24] Kashorda M, Waema T. E-Readiness survey of Kenyan Universities 2013 report. Nairobi: Kenya Education Network. 2014.

[25] Moftakhari MM. Evaluating e-learning readiness of faculty of letters of Hacettepe [master's thesis] Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü; 2013.

[26] Assareh A, Bidokht MH. Barriers to e-teaching and e-learning. Procedia Computer Science. 2011; 3:791-5.

[27] Grabau CR. Undergraduate student motivation and academic performance in a flipped classroom learning environment. US: Saint Louis University, Missouri. 2015.

[28] Yilmaz R. Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017; 70:251-60.

[29] Saeedi, A. Iran's higher education statistics in the academic year 2016-2017. Tehran. Institute for Research and Planning of Higher Education. 2017. Persian.

[30] Engholm P, McLean J. What determines an organization’s readiness for e-learning? [bachelor Thesis] Australia: Monash University; 2001.

[31] Anderson T. Is e-learning right for your organization? Learning Circuits: ASTD’s Online Magazine All. 2002.

[32] Haney BD. Assessing organizational readiness for e‐learning: 70 questions to ask. Performance improvement. 2002; 41(4):10-5.

[33] Worknowledge. e-learning Assessment Readiness. 2004.

[34] Borotis S, Poulymenakou A. E-learning readiness components: Key issues to consider before adopting e-learning interventions. In Proceedings of e-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1622-1629). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 2004.

[35] Kaur K, Zoraini Wati A. An assessment of e-learning readiness at Open University Malaysia. 2004.

[36] Kapp KM. Winning E-learning proposals: The Art of development and delivery. J. Ross publishing; 2003.

[37] Chapnick S. Are you ready for E-Learning? Learning Circuits Update. Electronic Publication. 2000.

[38] Aydın CH, Tasci D. Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an emerging country. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2005; 8(4):244-57.

[39] Psycharis S. Presumptions and actions affecting an e-learning adoption by the educational system-Implementation using virtual private networks. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning. 2005; 8(2).

[40] Machado C. Developing an e‐readiness model for higher education institutions: Results of a focus group study. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2007; 38(1):72-82.

[41] Lopes C. Evaluating E-Learning Readiness in a Health Sciences Higher Education. 2007.

[42] Akaslan D, Law EL. Measuring teachers' readiness for e-learning in higher education institutions associated with the subject of electricity in Turkey. In Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). (pp. 481-490). IEEE; 2011.

[43] Keramati A, Afshari-Mofrad M, Kamrani A. The role of readiness factors in E-learning outcomes: An empirical study. Computers & Education. 2011; 57(3):1919-29.

[44] Doculan JA. e-Learning readiness assessment tool for Philippine higher education institutions. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education (IJITE). 2016; 5(2):33-43.

[45] Mercado C. Readiness assessment tool for an e-learning environment implementation. Special Issue of the International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management. 2008; 16:18-1.

[46] Shraim K, Zuheir K. Students' Readiness Towards E-learning. A case study of Virtual Classrooms for secondary education in Palestine. The 3rd Annual Forum on e-learning Excellence in the Middle East. Dubai. 2010.

[47] Onwuegbuzie AJ, Teddlie C. A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2003; 2:397-430.

[48] University of Isfahan. Academics disciplines.

[49] Tarbiat Modares University. History of the University.

[50] University of Tehran. Facts and figures.

[51] Hakim Sabzevari University. About university.

[52] Semnan University. About university.

[53] University of Sistan and Baluchestan. About USB.

[54] Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. History.

[55] Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University. History.

[56] Khajeh Nassir-Al-Deen Toosi (K. N. Toosi) University of Technology. About Us.

[57] Sharif University of Technology. Introduction.

[58] Gorgan University of Agricaltural Sciences and Natural Resources. History.

[59] University of Kashan. About.

[60] University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. About.

[61] University of Art. About us.

[62] Yazd University. About Yazd University.

[63] Cochran, W. G. Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons. 2007.

[64] Qamar MK. Global trends in agricultural extension: Challenges facing Asia and the Pacific region. A keynote paper presented at the FAO regional expert consultation on agricultural extension, research-extension-farmer interface and technology transfer in Bangkok, July 2002. Sustainable Development Department, FAO Rome. 2002.

[65] Farazkish M, Montazer Gh. Measuring readiness of digital content in selected universities of Iran. Paper presented in the 12^th e-Learning Conference, Tehran. 2016. Persian.

[66] Farazkish M, Montazer Gh. A comparative analysis of pro and students' readiness of universities in Iran, Turkey and Azerbaijan for the realization of e-learning system. Paper presented in the 13^th Conference on Quality Assessment in Academic Systems, Shiraz, 2019. Persian.

[67] Ojo RA, Ayanda DO. Handling internet connectivity challenges in a typical university academic library in Nigeria: A case study of Kenneth Dike Library. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve. 2012; 22(5):223-34.

[68] Lou EC, Goulding JS. The pervasiveness of e‐readiness in the global built environment arena. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. 2010.

[69] Babakhani M, Allah Karami A, Amirteimori MH, Aslani E, Ahmadpour Kasgari Z, Abedini Baltork M, Mansoori S. Evaluation of the Readiness for E-Learning from the Viewpoints of the Students and Professors of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2016; 7(1).

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Technology of Education Journal (TEJ)

Assessment of students' perceptual readiness for e-learning in Iranian Universities

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 57
January 2021
Pages 101-117

Assessment of students' perceptual readiness for e-learning in Iranian Universities

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 57January 2021Pages 101-117

Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 57
January 2021
Pages 101-117