Effectiveness of humorous electronic content on the learning and retention of math on fifth grade students

Rostaminezad, M.A.; Ajam, A.A.; Zabet, H.

doi:10.22061/jte.2018.4034.1982

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

² Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.4034.1982

Abstract

Background and Objective: One of the most sensitive parts of the education system in every person's life is elementary school. A period that plays a very important role in the life of each person; and the success or failure in this period will have very serious effects on the future of the individual. Meanwhile, the role and importance of mathematics is felt more than other subject matters as many students are weak in this course. For this reason, the teaching of this course should be changed from a strict and inflexible subject matter that is limited to lecturing to various approaches in accordance with mathematics education and active teaching methods along with new educational technologies. Educational technology and e-learning are some of the concepts that were introduced and attracted a lot of attention in the field of education with the growth and development of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Recently, Wanser proposed a theory of educational humor processing, a theory that has evolved from the basic models of persuasion and incompatibility theories to explain the role of educational humor in facilitating learning. This research conducted with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of the electronic humorous content on the learning and retention of students' mathematics.
Methods: The present study was a semi-experimental research using pre-test-post-test design with experimental and control groups. The population consisted of all 5th grade students (N=2200) in elementary schools at Birjand in 2018. The statistical population of the study consisted of 58 people who were selected with convenience sampling. The study sample included a class as the experimental group and another class as the control group selected out of four classes, each consisting of 29 people. For data collection, Teacher-made test used in pre-test and post-test. In addition to, descriptive analysis, covariance test used to analyze the data.
Findings: There is a significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental and control groups' mathematical learning variable. Regarding ETA, we can say that using humorous content, explains 15.4% of the variance of post-test scores ( = 15.4%،p < .05). There was no significant difference between the mean scores of pre-test and post-test of retention in the experimental group compared to the control group. The findings of this study showed that the effect of humorous electronic mathematical content on learning was significant (15%), but the effect of humorous electronic content on retention was not significant.
Conclusion: The use of e-content is a step forward toward the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process. The application of this research results for pedagogues is that in order to improve mathematics learning, we should pay attention to the role and function of humorous education and electronic content; and by combining these two direct mathematical teaching methods to create interest in this subject matter. Combining the process of teaching mathematics with humorous e-content will increase students' attention and motivation, improve their mathematical learning, and foster their creative power. The findings of several studies suggest that providing opportunities for collaborative, moderated, and competitive learning in schools can help reduce anxiety and improve students' math performance. This requires a systematic and purposeful effort on the part of the education system to bring about a change in math textbooks and teaching methods. For this reason, it is necessary to take essential measures to make the e-content as effective as possible. This requires that professionals, teachers, and all educators collaborate effectively and efficiently to successfully design and produce e-content.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1398.14.1.7.1

Main Subjects

Electronic learning- virtual

COPYRIGHTS
©2020 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Brian A. Effects of a math-enhanced curriculum and instructional Approach on the mathematics achievement of agricultural Power and technology students: an experimental study. Journal of Agricultural Education. 2006;47(3).

[2] Tobias S. Overcoming math anxiety. New York: W.W. Norton; 1995.

[3] Rostami Nejad M, Mohammadi Moghadam S, Mohammadi R. An Investigation on humor in Increasing the Effectiveness of Elementary Education: Why and How?. National Conference on Elementary Education. 2015; 1-12. Persian.

[4] Yarahmadi vasel M. Predictors of math anxiety and its relation to the decline of mathematical education. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2010;(14). Persian.

[5] Babaei M. Introduction to e-learning. Tehran: Iranian Information Science and Technology Research Center: Chapar; 2010. Persian.

[6] Koohang A, Harman K. Open source: A metaphor for e-learning. Informing science journal. 2005; 8.

[7] Khoshnoodifar M, Fazelian P, Farajalahi M. E-Learning: An Introduction to education. Tehran: Avaye noor. 2014.

[8] Shelly G. Teachers Discovering Computers, Integrating Technology in the Classroom. Thompson Course Technology: Massachusetts; 2004.

[9] Brand M. The Effect of Technology on Attention and Concentration within the Classroom Context. January; 2010.

[10] Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, s. (1991). Individual differences in the communication of humorous message. Southern communication.

[11] Booth-Butterfield M. Wanzer M. Humorous communication as goal- oriented communication. State; 2010.

[12] Berlyne D. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960.

[13] Gruner C. Understanding laughter: The working of wit and humor. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1978.

[14] Gruner C. The game of humor. New Bruswick: NJ: Transaction; 1997.

[15] Martin R. The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press; 2007.

[16] Morreall J. Taking Laughter Seriously. New York: State University of New York Press; 1987.

[17] Berlyne D. AROUSAL, REWARD AND LEARNING. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1969; 159(3 Experimental):1059-1070.

[18] Berlyne D. AFFECTIVE ASPECTS OF AESTHETIC COMMUNICATION11The preparation of this chapter and research discussed in it were supported by research grants APA-73 from the National Research Council of Canada and S69-1073 from the Canada Council. Communication and Affect. 1972; 97-118.

[19] PEtty R, Cacioppo J. Attitudes and persesuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque: WestviewPress; 1981.

[20] Petty R, Cacioppo J. Communication and persuasion: The central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springler-Verlag; 1986.

[21] Paul-Emile Chiasson. “Using Humor in the Second Language Classroom”. The Internet TESL Journal. 2002; 8(3).

[22] Berk R. Professors are from Mars, students are from Snickers. Madison, Wis.: Mendota Press; 1998.

[23] Afshar Kohan Z. Mathematics: passing humor to creativity. Journal of Theory and Practice in Curriculum. 2016;4(8). Persian.

[24] Hill D. Humor in the Classroom: A Handbook for Teachings (and Other Entertainers!). IL: Springfield, Charles C. Thomas; 1988.

[25] Zillmann D, Williams B, Bryant J, Boynton K, Wolf M. Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1980; 72(2):170-180.

[26] Ziv A. Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education. 1988; 57(1):5-15.

[27] McMorris R, Boothroyd R, Pietrangelo D. Humor in educational testing: A review and discussion. Applied Measurement in Education. 1997; 10:269-297.

[28] Banas J, Dunbar N, Rodriguez D, Liu S. A Review of Humor in Educational Settings: Four Decades of Research. Communication Education. 2011; 60(1):115-144.

[29] Chopanian Moghaddam T. The Effect of Humor on PowerPoint Content on Academic Motivation, Learning and Retention of Students, Master's thesis, Payam-e-Noor University of Gonabad; 2017. Persian.

[30] Asareh A, Zadashir M. The Effect of Computer-Aided Math Training on Mental Attitude of 9th Grade Students. Journal of Family Research. 2017; 35.

[31] Goodboy A, Booth-Butterfield M, Bolkan S, Griffin D. The Role of Instructor Humor and Students’ Educational Orientations inStudent Learning, Extra Effort, Participation, and Out-of-Class Communication. Communication Quarterly. 2015; 63(1):44-61.

[32] Sambrani T, Mani S, Almeida M, Jakubovski E. The Effect of Humor on Learning in an Educational Setting. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research. 2014; 3(3).

[33] Garner R. Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha! College Teaching. 2006; 54: 177-180.

[34] Helitzer M, Shatz M. Comedy writing secrets. Cincinnati, Ohio: Writer's Digest Books; 2005.

[35] Mills, R. (). Using PowerPoint for Learning and Teaching. LTSN Bio Sic Bull. Spring.2003; 8.

[36]Deiter R. The Use of Humor as a Teaching Tool in the College Classroom. NACTA Journal. 2000;.

[37] Amini Farh E, Saleh Sedghpour B, Valeinejad Turkmani F. The Effect of Educational Technology on Students' Math Learning. Journal of Research Technology Education. 2011; 5(5).Persian.

[38] Slavin R. Research on cooperative learning. Consensus and controversy. Educational leadership. 1990; 43 :52-55. 7.