Explaining principles governing desirable lesson study practice: Case study of Mazandaran Province

Pourahmadali, A.; Sheykhi Fini, A.; Zainalipour, H.; Izadi, S.

doi:10.22061/jte.2018.3237.1825

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas. Iran

² Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Mazandaran University, Babolsar. Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.3237.1825

Abstract

Background and Objective:The experience of some countries, including Japan, shows that opening the classroom and the whole educational process from design to evaluation to teachers and creating an educational group creates a cycle of gradual improvement of the educational process in the classroom and it brings positive effects. One of these methods that has emerged from the heart of the school and the classroom in the Japanese education system is lesson study. Lesson study is the most important factor in educational performance to develop the teaching profession. Curriculum research is a research circle in which teachers research curriculum topics in groups. In this advanced model, teachers and professionals work together. The assessment team (teachers) focus all their efforts on educating students in the classroom to grow and refine the subject matter. Through lesson study, the teacher communicates with the practice of research to base the practice of teaching on thought and action. Thoughtful and research-based practice actually introduces a set of skills and abilities that put a person in a critical position to solve problems and issues. This study aimed to explain principles governing desirable lesson study practice in mathematics in Mazandaran Province’s Educational Office.
Methods:The research method was qualitative and of phenomenological type. The statistical population of this study included all experts in lesson study. 16 participants were selected through Snowball sampling. The sample size was determined by theoretical saturation. The data collection instrument in this study was semi-structured interview and th validity of the data was assessed and verified by evaluating the participants. The data resulted from interviews were analyzed through categorization method.
Findings: Totally, 5 major categories were extracted from the interviews, including human aspect (creativity, responsibility and being open to criticism), structural aspect (technological equipment, supervision, programs, load of teacher work, ratio of the number of teacher to the student and applying results), cultural aspect (teamwork, school culture, belief and commitment to impact of lesson study, family cooperation, Researchers' spirit of teacher and principlas, teacher cooperation place of competition), managerial aspect (support, scoring process, authorities’ support, provision of budget, support of other school factors and time) and pedagogical aspect (exchange of useful educational experiences, workshops, new teaching styles, provincial team of lesson study, educational content, conversion of quantitative evaluation to descriptive and educational design).
Conclusion: This study was conducted with the aim of explaining the principles governing the optimal implementation of mathematics studies in primary schools of education in Mazandaran province. The categories extracted from the interviews include the human aspect, the structural aspect, the cultural aspect, the managerial aspect and the teaching-learning aspect. The human aspect includes the variables of creativity, responsibility and criticism. The structural aspect includes the variables of technological equipment, supervision, programs, teacher workload, teacher to student ratio and application of results. The cultural aspects include the variables of teamwork, school culture, belief and commitment to the impact of study, family cooperation, research spirit of teachers and principals, teacher cooperation instead of competition. The managerial aspect includes support, scoring process, official support, funding, support of other school and time executives. The teaching-learning aspect includes variables of conversion of useful educational experiences, workshops, new teaching styles, provincial study team, educational content, conversion of quantitative evaluation into descriptive and educational desig

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1397.13.1.10.7

Main Subjects

Teacher Education

COPYRIGHTS
©2019 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Kelly AV. The curriculum theory and practice. London: SAGE Publications; 2011.

[2] Sarkararani M. Education culture in Japan. Tehran: Rozname Negar Publishing; 2008. Persian.

[3] Carnous M. Globalization and educational reform: What planners need to know. Tehran: Yastoron; 2006. Persian.

[4] Stigler JW, Hiebert J. The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teaching for improving education in the classroom. J. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2009; 61: 211-224.

[5] Murata A, Takahashi A. District-level lesson study: How Japanese teachers improve their teaching of elementary mathematics. In Proc. of 5^th Annual Meeting of North American Chapter of the Int. Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1879-1888). Athens, GA, USA; 2002.

[6] Yoshida M. An overview of lesson study, In P. Wang-Iverson and M. Yoshida, (Eds.), Building our understanding of lesson study (pp. 3-14). Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools; 2005.

[7] Marton F, Runesson U. The idea and practice of Learning Study, In K. Wood and S. Sithamparam, (Eds.), Realising learning: teachers' professional development through lesson and learning study (pp. 103-121). London: Routledge; 2015.

[8] Cheng LP, ee, LP. A Singapore Case of Lesson Study. J. The Mathematics Educator. 2012; 21(2): 34-57.

[9] Yoshida M. Lesson study: A case of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; 1999.

[10] Meyer RD. Lesson Study: The Effects on Teachers and Students in Urban Middle Schools. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Baylor, Waco, Texas.; 2005

[11] Saito E, Hawe P, Hadiprawiroc S, Empedhe S. Initiating Education Reform through Lesson Study at a University in Indonesia, J. Educational Action Research. 2008; 16(3): 391-406.

[12] Tang Keow Ngang TK, Sam LCH. Principal Support in Lesson Study. J. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 205: 134-139.

[13] Brown S, Wiburg K. Lesson study communities: Increasing achievement with diverse students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2007.

[14] Lewis C. What Are the Essential Elements of Lesson Study?. J. Educational Study. 2009; 21(5), 52-65.

[15] Fernandez C, Yoshida M. Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning, New York: Routledge; 2009.

[16] Sarkararani MR. Transnational learning: The integration of JugyouKenkyuu into Iranian teacher training, In M. Matoba and K. Crawford, (Eds.), Handbook of lesson study: International perspective on policy and practice (pp. 37-75). Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House; 2006.

[17] Ngang TK, Sam LC. Principal support in lesson study. J. Procardia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 134-139; 2015.

[18] Scherer M. What we didn’t know when we co-taught: Making it work. J. Educational Leadership. 2017; 73(4), 7-12.

[19] Vrikki M, Warwick P, Vermunt JD, Mercer N, Halem NV. Teacher learning in the context of Lesson Study: A video-based analysis of teacher discussions. J. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2017; 25: 44-57.

[20] Beninghof AM. To clone or not to clone co-teaching: Making it work. J. educational Leadership. 2015; 73(4): 10-15.

[22] Ngang TK, Sam LC. Principal Support in Lesson Study. J. Procardia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 205: 134-139.

[23] Mostofo J. Using Lesson Study with preservice secondary mathematics teachers: Effects on instruction, planning, and efficacy to teach mathematics (doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, U.S; 2013.

[24] Bjuland R, Mosvold R. Lesson study in teacher education: Learning from a challenging case. J. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018; 52: 83-90.

[25] Vrikki M, Warwick P, Vermunt JD, Mercer N, Nicolette VH. Teacher learning in the context of Lesson Study: A video-based analysis of teacher discussions. J. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2017; 61: 211-224.

[26] Inprasitha N. Perceptions on professional development of supervisors in the non-project and project schools using Lesson Study. J. Procedia - Socialand Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 116: 2069 – 2 073.

[27] Soleimani I, Ahmadi H. Identifying the barriers to lesson study: A case study of primary schools in education in the City of Ardabil (mixed research). Journal of Research in Teaching. 2017; 5(1): 65-86. Persian.

[28] Farzanpour A, Nateghi F, Seifi M. Examining the principles governing the excellence of Lesson Study curriculum. Journal of Research in Teaching. 2017; 5(1): 127-148. Persian.

[29] Abdoli J, Ali Ashrafi M. Analyze and study the nature of lesson study and it’s breeding in schools. In Proc of The 2^nd Int. Humanitarian Conference with a Native-Islamic Approach and Emphasizing New Research (pp. 44-55). Behshar, Iran; 2016. Persian.

[30] Sarkararani M. Teacher collaborative research in classroom: Japan's experience in teacher training at school. Journal of Education and Training. 2005; 59: 76-61. Persian.

[31] Glaungernik B. Investigating the effect of lesson study on the critical thinking of teachers in Mashhad areas (master’s thesis). University of Ray Payam Noor, Tehran; 2011. Persian.

[32] Roshanghyas E. Investigating the impact of lesson study on the professional qualifications of elementary teachers in a district in Sari City (master’s thesis). University of Mazandaran, Babolsar; 2014. Persian.

[33] Behzad M. An excerpt from the macro scheme of the study of mathematical problems of the country. Tehran: Institute of Education; 2002. Persian.

[34] Yazdchi S, Zamani BE. The effectiveness of implementation of a visual design in learning the first-year Math course in Isfahan. Journal of Amozeh. 2002; 16, 61-66. Persian.

[35] Lichtman M. Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. London: Sage; 2006.

[36] Creswell W. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4^th ed). Boston: Pearson Pub; 2006.

[37] Agahi Esfehani B, Neshat Dost HT, Naeli H. Investigating the relationship between the cognitive style of independence and field affiliation with creativity. Journal of Psychology. 2004; 8(1): 37-51. Persian.

[38] Hoorizad B. Investigating the effectiveness of creativity-based research on the development of teachers' professional capacities and learning the creative behavior of teachers and students. Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy Culture. 2010; 1(1): 75-92. Persian.

[39] Sarkararani MR, Fukaya K. Learning beyond boundaries: Japanese teachers learning to reflect and reflecting to learn. Child Research Net. Unpublished manuscript; 2010.

[40] Banda B, Mudenda V, Tindy E, Nakai K. Lesson Study practice of science teachers in Zambia: Its effects, enhancing and hindering factors. In the Proc of the 3^th Int. Conference New Perspective in Science Education (pp. 1-5). Florence, Italy; 2014.

[41] Chokshi S, Fernandez C. Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. J. Phi Delta Kappan. 2004; 85(7): 520-525.

[42] Brown S, Wiburg K. Lesson study communities: Increasing achievement with diverse students (1^st ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2007.

[43] Brand BR, Glasson GE, Green AM. Sociocultural factors influencing students’ learning in science and mathematics: An analysis of the perspectives of African American students. J. School Science and Mathematics. 2006; 106(5), 228-236.

[44] Sarkararani M. Lesson study to improve practice. Journal of the Growth of Elementary Education. 2012; 16(3): 4-5. Persian.

[45] Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman PE, Yoon KS. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. J. American Educational Research. 2001; 38(4): 915-945.

[46] Hibert J, Gallimore R, Stigler JW. A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? J. Educational Researcher. 2002; 31(5): 3-15.