Identification of valuable natural factors by the VPS Method from children’s points of view, in order to provide a framework for organizing the school yard space

Ahmadpour Samani, N.; Farsi Mohammadipour, A.; Behrooz, S.M.

doi:10.22061/jte.2018.3212.1816

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Architecture Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj.Iran

² Architecture Department, Faculty of Architecture and urbanization, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran

³ Architecture Department, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanization, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.3212.1816

Abstract

Background and Objective: Addressing the issue of identifying elements of the nature are important to children and increase children's creativity. In such a way that these elements can be presented in a general framework so that designers and architects can rely on them, the most important concepts and items needed in the design, to consider these spaces and apply them. Of course, it should be noted that several environmental factors affect creativity. However, in this study, an attempt is made to identify the factors that have the most impact, so that the needs of children can be met in accordance with their activities and a general framework for designing children's spaces can be proposed. The main difference between this research and other researches is in prioritizing the effective factors in nature from the children's point of view and its effect on creativity and then presenting the results in the form of an overall design framework. Various research has been done on this subject, but in a one-dimensional way and in them only one factor is mentioned, such as the effect of creativity on learning, but none of them presents the effect of nature's role in increasing creativity. The purpose of this research is to determine which natural elements are important from children’s points of view and whether the use and presence of elements are possible in educational locations. This research seeks to find approaches to design school yards based on children’s points of view with regard to the role of nature in their education.
Methods: The research method used in this qualitative study is content analysis. Based on the nature of the subject, a questionnaire and the image technique were used as the main method of data collection. The structure of the questionnaire is based on the measures and criteria derived from the subject literature and designed based on Likert scale. In the first stage, 120 questionnaires were provided to children of 7-12 age in the case study. Results of the questionnaires were obtained. To ensure that the results of the questionnaires are expanded, the researcher, in the second phase, provided some pictures relevant to questionnaires, so that the children could respond to questions based on their visual preferences. The researcher then obtained results based on visual content analysis.
Findings: It was discovered that these two instruments of measurement are in line with each other and are appropriate to the environmental factors affecting children. Finally, a framework for organizing the school yard is presented.
Conclusion: By creating an appropriate, responsive and purposeful framework in design, we can address the main goal of the research, which is to identify the effective factors in nature from the children's point of view by increasing their creativity, and finally, an appropriate framework by considering these factors to organize the space of the school yard. The necessity of presenting the framework can be expressed in such a way that the weakening of children's connection with outside the classroom is harmful for the child, on the other hand, an intellectual movement moves towards learning outdoors. The presence of natural elements or the same nature has a positive effect on children's creativity, discovers and flourishes the latent talent in children and creates a suitable environment for a bright future for children.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1397.13.1.1.8

Main Subjects

Learning Environment

COPYRIGHTS
©2019 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1]Sylwester R. Skulls and school boxes: Student Brains that want out. Design Share. 2007; 3(1): 1-4.

[2] Mozafar F, Azemati H, Bagheri M. Designing urban gardens and developing children's creativity. Journal of Educational Technology. 2006; 2, 85-87. Persian.

[3]Golchin P, Naroy B, Masnavi MR. Visual qualitative assessment of educational facilities based on the preferences of consumers (Case study: University of Sistan and Baluchistan). Journal of Ecology. 2011; 62: 135-150. Persian.

[4]Mozaffar F, Hoseini B, Bagheri M, Azemati H. The role of neighborhood open spaces in the development and creativity of children. Journal of Baghe-e Nazar. 2006;4(8): 59-72. Persian.

[5]Sami Azar A. The concept and function of outdoor space in traditional and new schools. Journal of Sofe. 2000; 10: 104-111. Persian.

[6]Noghrekar A, Mozafar F, Saleh B, Shafai M. Scrolling in explaining the design principles of educational facilities. Journal of Armanshahr. 2009; 2(2): 67-74. Persian.

[7] Mozafar F, Mehdizade seraj F, Mirmoradi S. Recognizing the role of nature in educational areas. Journal of Educational Technology. 2009; 4: 46-37. Persian.

[8]Noghrekar A, Mozafar F, Saleh B, Shafai M. Designing a daycare center based on the relationship between creativity traits and architectural ideas. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations. 2010; 8(32): 39-59. Persian.

[9]Pour Ja'far M, Ansari M, Mahmoodnezhad H, Alizadeh A. Analysis study of children's creativity incentives in urban spaces and environment's design with emphasis on bringing up cohesions between creativity and physical design of urban spaces. Journal of Urban Management. 2010; 25(8): 63-81. Persian.

[10]Noghrehkar A, Taghdiri S, Moien Mehr S. Principles for designing the educational spaces based on the definition of the human and architecture from the perspective of Islam. Journal of Architecture andUrbanism of Iran. 2015; 6(10): 101-118. Persian.

[11] Shafaei M, Madani R. Design principles of educational facilities for children based on creativity. Journal of Educational Technology. 2010; 4(3): 215-222. Persian.

[12] Bagheri M, Azemati HR. Improving children’s creativity in school environment (Architectural space as educational curriculum). Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.). 2011; 6(22): 163-184. Persian.

[13] Gharehbeiglu M, Einifar AR, Izadi AA. Promote interaction between children with residential outdoor locations (Case study: Three types of residential street in the City of Tabriz). Journal of Fine Arts (Architecture & Urbanism). 2013; 18(2), 69-82. Persian.

[14] Mamykina L, Candy Linda, Edmonds E. Creativity Collaboration. Communication of the Acm. 2002; 45(10): 96-99.

[15] Shibata S, Suzuki N. Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. Environmental Psychology. 2002; 45(5): 265-272.

[16] Hornecker, E. Space and place, setting stage for social interaction; 2005.

[17] Collado S, Statts H, Corraliza J. Experiencing nature in children's summer camps: Affective, cignitive and behavioural cinsequences. Environmental Psychology. 2013; 23: 37-44.

[18] Rigolon A, Derr V. Green ground for play and learning: An intergenerational model joint design and use of school and park systems. In D. Sinnett, S., Burgess, and S. Smith (eds.), Handbook on green infrastructure: Planning, design, and implementation (pp. 281-300). UK: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited; 2015.

[19] Sullivan W, Kus F, Depooter S. The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and Behavior. 2004; 36(5): 678-700.

[20] Kytta M. Affordances of childrens environments in the context of cities, small towns, suburbs and rural villages in Finland and Belarus. Environmental Psychology. 2002; 22(2): 109-123.

[21] Shariatmadari A. Educational psychology (18^th ed.). Isfahan: Mashal Publications; 1965.

[22] Fjortoft I. Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children’s play and motor development. Children, Youth and Environments. 2004; 14(2): 111-121.

[23] Hoseini A. The effect of teacher creativity teaching program on creativity of academic achievement and students self-concept. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations and Environments. 2007; 6(23): 111-121. Persian.

[24] Said I. Architectural for children: Understanding children perception towards built environment. The Proc. of international conference challenges and experiences in developing architectural (pp. 1-6). Indonesia: Faculty of Built Environment University Teknologi Malaysia; 2007.

[25] Tamdogon O. Creativity in education: Clearness in perception, vigorousness in curiosity. Education for Information. 2006; 24(2-3): 139-151.

[26] Association, T. N; 2000.