Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

• Kh. Mirzaei ¹
• H. Saadi ¹
• S.H. Movahedmohamadi ²
• R. Movahedi ¹

¹ Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan. Iran

² Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tehran University, Karaj. Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives:E-learning is the newest form of distance learning and is called an approach to curriculum planning in which, in addition to using inclusive methods, computer tools and the Internet are used. The first generation of e-learning, or web-based learning programs, focused on providing physical classes based on educational content and the Internet. Today, many universities and educational institutions around the world have stepped in to design and offer e-learning programs and courses to meet the growing demand for education. One of the desirable features that can play an important role in increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of this type of training is the personalization of the learning environment according to the characteristics of learners. This adaptation is in order for the user to be able to benefit from the learning content and other services of the system according to their goals, knowledge and preferences, and the system, instead of treating everyone equally, treats everyone according to its own characteristics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effective factors of e-learning adoption in agricultural higher education universities of Iran and to determine the most effective structures on the acceptance of this technology by the faculty members and graduate students. This research was performed to measure the acceptance using survey and the multivariate statistical technique of path analyses.
Method and Materials: Statistical population of this research consisted of faculty members and postgraduate students in Iran’s higher agricultural education centers. Total Cronbach Alpha of the questionnaire, for the reliability of the 68 items of the questionnaire, was 88.5 % that is an acceptable figure which demonstrates the high reliability of the questionnaire. In total, 646 questionnaires were collected from 4 universities (Tehran University, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hormozgan University and Torbat Heydariyeh University). After multivariate statistical analysis ‘Path analysis’ and through calculating Beta Coefficients for different routes, the importance of each path was determined.
Findings: The results showed that if members of the faculty and postgraduate students of higher education of agriculture in Iran get this reflection that the use of e-learning to carry out their educational activities is useful and reliable at higher agricultural education centers, even those people are not consistent with their subjective norms and have risks, they will continue to use e-learning. From the perspective of the respondents, e-learning is a safe and appropriate education. Therefore, possible risks in such training in virtual environments does not affect their attitude towards this type of training.
Conclusion: Therefore, it can be said that if faculty members and graduate students of agricultural higher education in Iran come to the mentality that using e-learning to carry out their educational activities in agricultural higher education centers is "beneficial" as well as "reliable”, even if it is not compatible with their "mental norm" and has a "perceived risk", they will still use e-learning.

Highlights

[1] Aury MC. Agricultural Education Students’ Perception of WebCT in Puerto Rico. Paper presented at the IMPACT 2005, 7th Annual WebCT User Conference; San Francisco, California; 2005.

 [2] Kim HJ., Mannino M, Nieschwietz RJ. (2009).   Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: Impact of technology features and complexity. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2009; 10: 214-228.

 [3] Sheng Z., Jue Z, Weiwei T. Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective. Tsinghua Science and Technology. 2008; 13(3): 312-317.

 [4] Zhou Y,  Zhang JP. A quantitative approach to eMM. In The Proceedings of ICWL (pp. 69-72).Shanghai; 2008.

 [5] Kim S H. Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Journal of Information & Management. 2008; 45(5): 387-393.

 [6] Malik M. Factor effecting learner’s satisfaction towards e-Learning: A conceptual framework. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2010; 2(3): 77-82.

 [7] Tanrıkulu Z, Tugcu C, Yilmaz S. E-University: Critical success factors. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 2(2): 1253-1259.

 [8] Farrel GA, Cubit KA, Bobrowski CL, Salmon P. Using the WWW to teach undergraduate nurses clinical communication. Nurse Education Today. 2007; 27(5): 427-35.

 [9] Alkhalaf S, Drew S, Alhussain T. Assessing the impact of e-learning systems on learners: A survey study the KSA. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 47: 98- 104.

  [10] Khan BH. A framework for Web-based learning. Web-based training, (Eds.), NJ: Web- Based Traning, (pp. 75-98); 2011.

 [11] Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, Chen YY, Yeh D. What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education. 2008; 50(4): 1183-202.

 [12] Liaw SS, Huang HM. Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education. 2013; 60(1): 14-24.

 [13] Mortagy Y, Boghikian-Whitby S. A longitudinal comparative study of student perceptions in on. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects. 2010; 6(1): 23-44.

 [14] DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research. 1992; 3(1): 60-95.

 [15] Liaw SS. Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education. 2008; 51(2): 864-73.

 [16] Buzzetto- More N. Student perceptions of various e-learning components. Interdisciplinary. Journal Learning and Learning Objects. 2008; 4(1): 113-35.

 [17] George JF. The theory of planned behavior and internet purchasing. Internet Research. 2006; 14(3): 198-212.

 [18] Harrison DA, Meykytyn PP, Riemenschneider CK. Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small businesses: Theory and empirical test. Information Systems Research. 2010; 8(2): 171-195.

 [19] Asemi A. Metadata in e-learning environment, Journal of Electronic Research Institute for Scientific Information and Documents of Iran. 2013; 4(5): 16-24. Persian.

 [20] MehdiPooataie K.  [Translation of E-learning tools and technologies].  Horton W, Horton K. (Authors). Teahran: Dibagaran Publications; 2010. Persian.

 [21] Momenirad A. An investigation the quality of information technology field in e-learning courses at K. N. Toosi University of Technology according with e-learning standards. (master'sthesis).  Educational Science & Psychology Faculty, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran; 2009. Persian.

 [22] Talaei Mashouf AA. An investigation the adaptation of the mathematic e-learning program at K. N. Toosi University of Technology according to the behavioral, cognitive and structural principles. (master's thesis). Educational Science & Psychology Faculty, Allameh Tabatabat University, Tehran, Iran; 2011. Persian

 [23] Ghaedi B. The evaluation of virtual learning curriculum from the Viewpoints on computer engineering learners and professors, (master’s thesis), Tarbiat MoallemUniversity, Tehran, Iran; 2010. Persian.

 [24] Karimzadegan Moghadam D, Khodaparast M, Vahdat D. An evaluation of the factors that effect on the learner satisfaction in elearning program. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Research Institute for Information Science & Technology. 2011; 27(2): 461-478. Persian.

 [25] Rezaie M. The Common Theories On Accepting Information and Communication Technology. QuarterlyJournal of Communication Research. 2010; 4(60): 63-93.

 [26] Rahmani B. The analytical study on the content of Vocational Training Courses. Tehran:  School of Hadith Sciences of Shahre Rey; 2011

 [27] Sheykhshoaee F. Investigating the factors affecting the Acceptance of Information Technology by librarians in the Technical Schools of Tehran State Universities: Applicability: Technology Acceptance Model, (master’s thesis). Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran; 2006. Persian

 [28] Hart C. Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 2012; 11(1): 19-42.

 [29] Tung F Ch, Chang SCh. Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies; 2010; 45: 1299–1309.

 [30] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: AddisonWesley; 1975.

 [31] Cothran T. Google scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study. Journal of Library and Information Science Research. 2011; 33(4): 293-30.

 [32] Zha X, Li J, Yan Y. Understanding the moderating effect of tie on the transfer of ease of use and usefulness from print resources to electronic resources. Journal of Library & Information Science. 2013; 6(7): 223-231.

 [33] Shibl R, Lawley M, Debuse J. Factors influencing decision support system acceptance. Journal of Decision Support Systems. 2013; 54(2): 953-96.

 [34] Wu J, Tsai RJ, Chen CC, Wu Y. An integrative model to predict the continuance use of electronic learning systems: Hints for teaching. International Journal on E-Learning. 2011; 5(2): 1537-2456.

 [35] Holden R J, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2010; 43(1): 159-172.

 [36] Melas CD, Zampetakis LA, Dimopoulou A, Moustakis V. Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: An extended TAM model. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2011; 44(4): 553-564.    

 [37] Lin KM. E-learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Computers & Education. 2011; 56(2): 515-526.

 [38] Sarmad Z, Bazargan A, Hezaji E. Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: AgahPublications; 2006.  Persian.

Keywords

• e-Learning
• Acceptance of Technology
• Higher Education
• Agricultural Education
• path analysis
• Information Technology

20.1001.1.20080441.1397.12.3.1.9

Main Subjects

• Electronic learning- virtual