Comparative Approach of Smart and Non-Smart Schools in Promoting the Entrepreneurial Thinking of Students

Jafari, M.; Ghoraishi Khorasgani, M.S.; Samadi, P.

doi:10.22061/tej.2024.10192.2962

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2024.10192.2962

Abstract

Background and Objectives: One of the most important missions of education is the balanced education of researching and creative students with entrepreneurial spirit and thinking. In this regard, the vision and fundamental transformation document of education emphasizes the importance of cultivating creative and innovative individuals who possess the necessary skills to contribute to science, technology, and entrepreneurship. Based on this importance and emphasis of upstream documents, therefore, schools should play a pivotal role in developing features such as creativity, self-confidence, futurism, risk-taking, and the tendency towards success (entrepreneurial spirit) in students. Promoting entrepreneurial thinking in schools leads to responsibility, increased creativity in achieving goals and discovering new opportunities, and academic and entrepreneurial skills in students. The present research investigated the role of smart and non-smart schools in promoting entrepreneurial thinking among students.
Methods: The present study was applied in purpose, quantitative in approach, and comparative causal. The statistical population includes 690 female students from smart and non-smart high schools in Qazvin city. Using the cluster sampling method, 266 students from each group were selected as the research sample. To collect the data, the researchers used a questionnaire consisting of five main components and 20 items. The formal and content validity of the questionnaire was verified by three experts in the field of study. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and was obtained as 0.779. The data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk Test, one-way multivariate of variance test and Levene's test.
Findings: The findings indicated that female students in smart schools had higher levels of entrepreneurial thinking in five main components: creative thinking (7.243), independence seeking (6.059), opportunity seeking (7.642), risk-taking (6.473), and internal control locus (5.513) compared to non-smart schools. In general, schools that used modern smart technologies have developed competencies such as creative thinking, independence seeking, opportunity seeking, risk-taking, and internal control locus in students. As a result, students in smart schools felt more successful, motivated, and confident in creating new ideas, ultimately leading to the promotion and emergence of entrepreneurial thinking.
Conclusion: Since the entrepreneurial thinking as the basic power of the human mind is one of the main goals of schools and educational centers, therefore schools should be able to provide a suitable platform for the flourishing of characteristics such as; It provided students with creativity, self-confidence, foresight, risk-taking and entrepreneurial spirit. Because, global competition and the need of future jobs for skilled and efficient people show the necessity of creating an entrepreneurial culture in schools. To achieve this goal in the country, it is necessary to raise awareness, promote the culture of entrepreneurship and provide the necessary infrastructure in education. To promote entrepreneurial thinking among students, schools should implement practical teaching methods, team-based and active participation teaching methods, electronic content development of entrepreneurship in multimedia format, periodic feedback on student performance, delegation of school responsibilities, limited options for students, independent problem-solving, and entrepreneurial internships for students.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Technology-based learning environments

COPYRIGHTS
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

References

[1 [Salehi Omran E, Rostami F. [A survey of the impact of tertiary education on the development of the spirit of entrepreneurship]. Journal of Management and Planning in System. 2009; 2(1): 22-34. [In Persian].

[2] Fifth Development Plan. Islamic Council Research Center. 2011-2015. [In Persian].

[3] Seventh Development Plan. Islamic Council Research Center. 2022. [In Persian].

[4] Moi Siew N, Ahmad J. The Development of Entrepreneurial Thinking in STEM Education: A Teaching and Learning Module for Elementary Students. 17th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2022; 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.34190/ecie.17.1.367

[5] Mukhtar S, Wardana LW, Wibowo A, Narmaditya BS. [Does entrepreneurship education and culture promote students’ entrepreneurial intention? The mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset]. Cogent Education. 2021; 8: 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.10802331186X.2021.1918849

[6] Khorshidi HR, Banifatemi S, Janalinejad N. [Investigating entrepreneurial intellectual design training on the entrepreneurial thinking of school students in the 10th module of the work and technology book]. International Conference on Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering. 2014. [In Persian].

[7] Charbashlu H, Abbasi E. [Training Requiremnt for Enhancement of Employability Skills in Modular Courses and Applied Science System: A Way to Guarantee Employment]. Journal of Skill Training. 2013; 1(3): 93-104. [In Persian].

[8] Mico H, Cungu, J. [Entrepreneurship Education, a Challenging Learning Process towards Entrepreneurial Competence in Education]. Administrative Sciences. 2023; 13 (1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010022

[9] Alipour Katigari R, Heidari H, Narimani M, Davoody H. [Comparison of the Effectiveness of Participatory Teaching Method and Traditional Teaching Method on Academic Exercise, Self-efficacy and Self-Controlling in Students]. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 2020; 14 (48): 23-39. [In Persian].

[10] Alimoradi F, Mahbobi T, Karimi S B. [The role of educational environment in the performance and academic vitality of smart and traditional school students]. Th² national conference on new findings in the field of teaching and learning in elementary school, Banarabbas, July 2020. [In Persian].

[11]Alimorad H, Sharif H. The importance of creative thinking and teaching entrepreneurial values at schools. Mathematics and Society. 2023; 7(4): 79-84. [In Persian].

[12] Moradi pordanjani H, Niknami M, Pourzahir A T, Jafari P. [A Model for Education of Entrepreneur Students in Elementary Schools (case study: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province)]. Journal of studies and psychological news in adolescents and youth. 2022; 2(1): 252-273. [In Persian].

[13]Samadaghaee J. Creativity: The Essence of Entrepreneurship. Tehran: University of Tehran Publication. 2006. [In Persian].

[14]Guidelines for the Smartization of Education. Statistics Center for Information and Communication Technology, Ministry of Education of Iran. 2008. [In Persian].

[15] Dortaj F, Lakpour E, Bohlouli A. [Evaluation of Impact of Smart Schools on Academic Achievement of High School's Student in Lorestan Province]. Technology of Education Journal, 2014; 8 (1): 63-71. [In Persian].

[16]Hajati H. [The effect of ICT in the curriculum]. New Approach in Educational Sciences. 2022; 4(2): 1-8. [In Persian].

[17]Khani M, Bagheri S, Bayat A, Mortazavi S. The Relationship between Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Goal Orientation towards Academic Progress among Third-Year High School Physics Students in Tabriz. Paper presented at the International Conference on Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2016. [In Persian].

[18]Zabehi M, Moghaddasi A. Entrepreneurship from Theory to Practice. Mashhad: Jahane Farda Publication. 2009. [In Persian].

[19] Jafari M. [Comparative approach of smart and non-smart schools in promoting the entrepreneurial thinking of students]. Master's thesis in educational management. Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University.

[20] Barzegar S. Investigating the Relationship between Adaptive Learning Style and Creativity of Third-Grade Female Middle School Students in Amol. 2nd International Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences and Lifestyle. 2016 January. [In Persian].

[21] Weng X, Chiu TKF, Tsang CC. [Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education]. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2022; 45: 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046

]22 [Ghofrani N, Hosseini S R, mosa khani M. [An entrepreneurial school model based on the development of entrepreneurial Attitude in high school level]. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 2022; 15(1): 160-141. [In Persian].

[23]Jeddi Gargari J, Mohabzadegan Y, Azizi M. [Identification of Effective Components on Entrepreneurship Education of Secondary School Students]. Curriculum Research Journal. 2022; 11(2): 244-267. [In Persian].

[24]Sabzeh B. [Designing a Model for Entrepreneurship Curriculum for Preschool Children and Its Evaluation due to the Viewpoint of Specialists in curriculum, Entrepreneurship and Educators]. Preschool and Elementary School Studies. 2015; 1(1): 140-160. [In Persian].

[25]Naseri M, Mashhadian F. Iranian Smart Schools and Quality. Magazine of School of Tomorrow. 2011; 7. [In Persian].

[26 ] Kalantari S, Rabani R, Hazar Jaribi J. [Examining the degree of entrepreneurship of graduates in the field of publications and press]. Journal of Social Sciences Letter. 2004; 3(23): 448. [In Persian].

[27] shahidi S, hosseini khah A, Aliasgari M, Seikkula_leino J. [International Models of Educational Entrepreneurship in Higher Education and a Native Model for Iran]. Journal of higher education curriculum studies. 2021; 12(23): 131-171. [In Persian].

[28]Jahanian R. [Aspects and Elements of Fostering and development the Creativity among Elementary School Students in Alborz Province]. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science. 2016; 6(2): 175-202. [In Persian].

[29]Bakhtiari L B, Ghadampour E G, Bakhtiari M B, Sadin A A S. [A Comparison of Information Literacy and Social Skills in Students in Distance Education and Those in Traditional Education]. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. 2014; 4(3): 49-69. [In Persian].

[30] Samadi P, Shirzadi esfehani H. [A Study of the Relation Between Schools’ Organizational Atmosphere and The Spirit Of Entrepreneurship Among Students]. Journal of Educational Innovations. 2006; 5(16): 164-187. [In Persian].

[31]Yadollahi Farsi J, Mirarab Razi R. [A Survey of Entrepreneurship Curriculum Development in the Field of Education]. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 2009; 1(3): 61-80. [In Persian].