The Impact of Software Pedagogy on Architectural Creativity: Finding the Appropriate Method and Time for Teaching Software to Architecture Students

Ahmadi Tabatabaie, S. M.A.; Moosavi, S. M.

doi:10.22061/tej.2024.10142.2953

Document Type : Original Research Paper-English Issue

Authors

¹ Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Mazandaran, , Iran

² Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2024.10142.2953

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The rapid advancement of computer technology has revolutionized various aspects of work and life, emphasizing the need for training and proper utilization of digital tools. Architectural software has become integral to the design process, enabling architects to explore new methods. However, concerns have arisen regarding the impact of software on creativity and innovation. This study aims to determine the appropriate timing and method for teaching software to architecture students while mitigating the negative effects on creativity. The findings will contribute to the development of more effective software training approaches in architecture schools and design firms. While technology offers benefits such as increased design speed and visualization, a balance between digital tools and traditional methods should be maintained in architectural education.
Materials and Methods: The study adopts a qualitative approach, involving activities such as observation, interviews, and extensive participation in research activities to obtain firsthand information about the research subject. Qualitative research encompasses various data collection methods such as field research, observation or participation, and in-depth interviews. In the initial phase, the documentary method and library study were employed to establish the theoretical foundations of the research topic. In-depth interviews were conducted to gather information from experts in the field of architectural education. Data analysis involved content analysis, where the components of the collected text were categorized and counted. The independent variables of the research are the correct method and timing of teaching architectural software to students, while the dependent variable is the improvement of students' efficiency and benefit from learning the software. The findings were derived from the analysis of the interview responses and logical reasoning.
Findings: The findings of the research indicate that students entering the field of architecture should first develop a solid foundation in hand drawing and design principles before delving into architectural software. Early exposure to software without a proper understanding of architecture can hinder creativity and result in the production of complex forms devoid of purpose and spatial understanding. It is recommended that students establish a strong connection between their hand, eye, and mind through freehand drawing and creative thinking before transitioning to digital software. The concept stage of design is best approached through manual sketches and modeling, while software can be utilized in later stages. Simultaneous teaching of software alongside other architectural subjects may lead to information overload and reduced focus. A progressive and integrated approach to teaching software within the curriculum is suggested to enhance students' practical application of software tools. This research provides insights for developing an effective educational method that prepares students for the job market while fostering their creativity and architectural understanding.
Conclusions: The research findings suggest that students should learn architectural software after developing a foundation in hand drawing and design principles. Starting software training too early can hinder creativity and result in superficial designs. Teaching software alongside other architectural subjects in a progressive and integrated manner is recommended. Practical, project-based training helps students understand software features and promotes lasting learning. Unnecessary software components should be avoided to prevent confusion. Universities should modify their programs to meet students' needs in the job market and provide comprehensive software education.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Education technology - higher education

COPYRIGHTS
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

References

[1] Kalolo JF. Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies. 2019;24:345-58.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9778-3.

[2] Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers. 2022;3:275-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.

[3] Iivari N, Sharma S, Ventä-Olkkonen L. Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? International Journal of Information Management. 2020;55:102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183.

[4] Rahmane A, Harkat N, Abbaoui M. Educational Situations (ES) as Useful Tools for Teachers to Improve Architectural Design Studio Courses (ADSC). International Online Journal of Education and Teaching. 2022;9(1):551-70.

[5] Hunde BR, Woldeyohannes AD. Future prospects of computer-aided design (CAD)–A review from the perspective of artificial intelligence (AI), extended reality, and 3D printing. Results in Engineering. 2022;14:100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100478.

[6] ÖZÇAM I. Use of 3D printing technology in design education: A study based on course outcomes. Sustainable Current Approaches in Architectural Science and Technology. 2022:167.

[7] Song Y, Koeck R, Luo S. Review and analysis of augmented reality (AR) literature for digital fabrication in architecture. Automation in construction. 2021;128:103762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103762.

[8] Asad MM, Naz A, Churi P, Tahanzadeh MM. Virtual reality as pedagogical tool to enhance experiential learning: a systematic literature review. Education Research International. 2021;2021:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7061623.

[9] Pan Y, Zhang L. Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction. 2021;122:103517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517.

[10] Subramanya K, Kermanshachi S. Exploring Utilization of the 3D Printed Housing as Post-Disaster Temporary Shelter for Displaced People. Construction Research Congress 2022: 2021 September. p. 594-605.

[11] Steenson MW. Architectural intelligence: How designers and architects created the digital landscape: MIT Press; 2022. ISBN: 9780262546782.

[12] Xiang X, Yang X, Chen J, Tang R, Hu L. A comprehensive model of teaching digital design in architecture that incorporates sustainability. Sustainability. 2020;12(20):8368. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208368.

[13] Afify HMN, Alhefnawi MA, Istanbouli MJ, Alsayed AH, Elmoghazy ZAAE. An evaluation of physical model-making as a teaching method in the architectural design studio–A case study at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2021;12(1):1123-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.002.

[14] Gushchin A, Divakova M. ICT in education of architects. How to strike a balance? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2017;237:1323-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.217.

[15] Fakhry M, Kamel I, Abdelaal A. CAD using preference compared to hand drafting in architectural working drawings coursework. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2021;12(3):3331-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.01.016.

[16] Mozaffar F, Khakzand M. Architectural design process in technology age. International Journal of Engineering Sciences. 2009;19(6):53-72. [In Persian]

[17] Aydin S, Aktaş B. Developing an Integrated VR Infrastructure in Architectural Design Education. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2020;7:1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.495468

[18] Asefi M, Imani E. Evaluating the Effect of Digital Software Application on Creativity Promotion in Architectural Design Education. Hoviatshahr. 2018;11(4):79-92. [In Persian]

[19] Pallasma J. [Translation of Ali Akbari]. The thinking hand: existential and embodied wisdom in arthitecture. Tehran: Parham Naghsh; 2016. ISBN: 9786006126203. [In Persian]

[20] Shahbazi A, Arbaban Esfahani A. The effect of architectural design software on design speed. The first annual conference on architectural, urban planning and urban management research: 2015 December: Yazd, Iran. [In Persian]

[21] Bashabsheh AK, Alzoubi HH, Ali MZ. The application of virtual reality technology in architectural pedagogy for building constructions. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2019;58(2):713-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.06.002.

[22] Berni A, Borgianni Y. Applications of virtual reality in engineering and product design: Why, what, how, when and where. Electronics. 2020;9(7):1064.

https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9071064.

[23] Rami ZAL, Al-Tameemi OA. Role of virtual reality technologies in Iraqi educational spaces. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). 2021;12(6):3887-901. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.7855.

[24] Özacar K, Ortakcı Y, Küçükkara MY. VRArchEducation: Redesigning building survey process in architectural education using collaborative virtual reality. Computers & Graphics. 2023;113:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052566.

[25] Raina A, Cagan J, McComb C. Design strategy network: a deep hierarchical framework to represent generative design strategies in complex action spaces. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2022;144(2):021404.

https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052566.

[26] Kara L. A critical look at the digital technologies in architectural education: when, where, and how? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;176:526-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.506.

[27] Abdullah HK, Hassanpour B. Digital design implications: a comparative study of architecture education curriculum and practices in leading architecture firms. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2021;31(2):401-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09560-2.

[28] Ching FD. Building construction illustrated. US: John Wiley & Sons; 2020. ISBN: 978-1-119-58308-0

[29] Delgado JMD, Oyedele L, Demian P, Beach T. A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2020;45:101122.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101122.

[30] Hamilton D, McKechnie J, Edgerton E, Wilson C. Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education. 2021;8(1):1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2.

[31] Pena MLC, Carballal A, Rodríguez-Fernández N, Santos I, Romero J. Artificial intelligence applied to conceptual design. A review of its use in architecture. Automation in Construction. 2021;124:103550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103550.

[32] Cavalliere C, Habert G, Dell'Osso GR, Hollberg A. Continuous BIM-based assessment of embodied environmental impacts throughout the design process. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;211:941-52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.247.

[33] Gao H, Koch C, Wu Y. Building information modelling based building energy modelling: A review. Applied Energy. 2019;238:320-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.032.

[34] Alzoubi H. BIM as a tool to optimize and manage project risk management. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2022;7(1).

[35 Pena WM, Parshall SA. Problem seeking: An architectural programming primer. US: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. ISBN: 978-1-118-08414-4.

[36] Cross N. Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. US: John Wiley & Sons; 2021. ISBN: 978-1-119-72437-7.

[37] Chen F, Terken J. Automotive Interaction Design: From Theory to Practice. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2022. ISBN: 9789811934506.

[38] Micheli P, Wilner SJ, Bhatti SH, Mura M, Beverland MB. Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2019;36(2):124-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466.

[39] Mahmoodi AS, Bastani M. Conceptualization methods in the design process of architecture. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi. 2018;23(1):5-18.

[40] Chen F, Terken J. Design Process. Automotive Interaction Design: From Theory to Practice: Springer; 2022. pp. 165-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3448-3_10.

[41]Ching FD. Architecture: Form, space, and order. US: John Wiley & Sons; 2023.

[42] Loidl H, Bernard S. Open (ing) spaces: Design as landscape architecture: Birkhäuser; 2022. ISBN: 978-3-0356-2618-6.

[43] Duerk DP. [Translation of Seyed Amir Saeid Mahmoodi]. Architectural programming : information management for design. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2016. ISBN: 9789640361337. [In Persian]

[44] Nadimi H, Shariat Rad F. Sources of Architectural Design Ideation A Reflection on the Ideation Process of Eight Iranian Professional Architects. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi. 2012;17(2):5-14. [In Persian]

[45] Verganti R, Vendraminelli L, Iansiti M. Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2020;37(3):212-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12523.

[46] Mitrovic B. Philosophy for architects. New York: Princeton Architectural Press ; 2012.

[47] Lucchi E. Regenerative Design of Archaeological Sites: A Pedagogical Approach to Boost Environmental Sustainability and Social Engagement. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):3783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043783.

[48] Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh M, Keivani A, Moehler RC, Jelodari N, Roshdi Laleh S. Internet of Things (IoT), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Digital Twin (DT) in construction industry: A review, bibliometric, and network analysis. Buildings. 2022;12(10):1503.

https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101503.

[49] Mojarad Darbadam M, Noripor E, Darabi A. Evaluating the application of digital architecture in the design of new structures. The fourth National Conference on New Materials and Structures in Civil Engineering: 2015 November: Yasuj, Iran. [In Persian]

[50] Koerniawan M. Arsitektur Cyberspace I: Eksplorasi Arsitektur Dengan Media Digital. Jurnal IPLBI. 2012:1-10.

[51] Moghaddam N, Kheirollahi M. A Comparative Exploration of the Phenomenological Conception of Creative Imagination and Its Role in the Digital and Non-Digital Architectural Design Processes. Scientific Journal of Maremat & Me'mari-e Iran (quarterly). 2019;9(20):1-20. [InPersian]

[52] Rafsanjani HN, Nabizadeh AH. Towards digital architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry through virtual design and construction (VDC) and digital twin. Energy and Built Environment. 2023;4(2):169-78.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2021.10.004.

[53] Andadari TS, Purwanto L, Satwiko P, Sanjaya R. Study of digital architecture technology: theory and Development. study of digital architecture technology: theory and development. 2021;3(1):14-21.

[54] Chiesa G. Technological paradigms and digital eras. Switzerland: Springer; 2020. ISBN: 978-3-030-26201-3.

[55] Knippers J, Kropp C, Menges A, Sawodny O, Weiskopf D. Integrative computational design and construction: Rethinking architecture digitally. Civil engineering design. 2021;3(4):123-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.202100027.

[56] Wajcman J. The digital architecture of time management. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2019;44(2):315-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918795041.

[57] ganji khabiri a, diba d, shahchragi a. Conforming Form to Data: Context-Oriented Architecture in the Digital Age. Architecture and urban planning of Iran. 2015(10):63-86. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2016.62008

[58] Nabiyev A. El fenómeno de la arquitectura digital: los problemas y las perspectivas. Innovaciencia. 2022;10(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.2967.

[59] Winiarti S, Pramono H, Pranolo A. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Architecture to Identify Traditional Javanese Buildings. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture. 2022;1(1):20-9.

https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v1i1.4916.

[60] delavar a. Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences. Tehran: Roshd; 2020. Persian. ISBN: 978-964-6115-17-0.

[61] Leko MM, Cook BG, Cook L. Qualitative methods in special education research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2021;36(4):278-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12268.

[62] Taherdoost H. What are different research approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research. 2022;5(1):53-63.

[63] Delavar a. Qualitative Methodology. Strategy. 2010;18(1):307-29. [In Persian]

[64] Mohajan D, Mohajan H. Development of Grounded Theory in Social Sciences: A Qualitative Approach. Studies in Social Science & Humanities. 2022;5(1):13-24.

[65] Kalvari Janaki S, Khakbaz A, Pourjamshidi M. Investigating the status of information literacy in Persian and writing textbooks at the first year of high school. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 2021;16(1):1-12. [InPersian]

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2021.6544.2411

[66] Shafi'a S, Sabbaghpour Azarian M. Explaining the concept of spirituality in tourism using content analysis. Tourism management studies. 2016;11(35):107-27. [In Persian]

https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2017.7082