Document Type : Original Research Paper-English Issue

Authors

1 Department of English Language, Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Foreign Languages, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Educational psychology is one of the core concepts in the area of teaching and learning and plays a key role in any educational context including language instruction. Learners’ mindset (fixed or growth) may have an impact on the learning process and the ubiquitous technology can be of influence in making a change in students’ mindset. Despite the claim that through practice learners can improve in their subjects, many still consider it futile without related innate intelligence. Finding solutions for shifting this detrimental mindset is essential. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effect of using gamified and interactive content (H5P) on shifting English learners’ mindset, moving from a fixed mindset into a growth one. Another purpose was to discover the probable relationship between learners’ different General English (GE) levels, the rate of their initial mindset, and the proportion of change induced in their mindset throughout the course.
Materials and Methods: The participants consisted of 225 students aged 12-13 (111: experimental; 114: control). After conducting a placement test and using Dweck’s (2017) mindset questionnaire to measure their initial mindset, both groups went through a 12-week-long course, receiving similar instruction, except for the teaching phase. While the experimental group’s course was conducted through gamified and interactive content hosted on the Learning Management System, the control group’s was conducted live through web conferencing. Afterward, the learners redid the questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using ANCOVA and ANOVA statistical tests.
Findings: To compare the GE levels two by two, a Scheffe test was used, and based on its results, it can be deduced that mindset differences mean for Pre-A1 (p = 0.001), A1 (p = 0.001) and A2 and above (p = 0.025) were all significant. Comparing the mindset differences means between the three English level groups, it can be inferred, however, that the Pre-A1 group was the highest in mindset differences mean, while A2 was the lowest. In other words, the weaker was the students’ level of GE, the higher the amount of change in their mindset type towards a growth one. The findings of the present study showed that the use of gamified interactive content (H5P) in the bichronous format of the LMS can have a significant effect on improving high school EFL learners’ Growth Mindset levels by 39%. The contents, which were provided for students in both gamified and H5P classes, resulted in immediate feedback exchanges, which raised the motivational level and encouraged them to go on with different interactive tasks and activities.
Conclusions: After carrying out the research, the researchers concluded that using gamified and interactive content as part of the learning process could induce a Growth Mindset in learners, higher GE students mostly had higher initial rates of Growth Mindset, and weaker learners experienced greater shifts towards growth. This study can motivate language learners and teachers to utilize gamified and interactive content in online courses and can help educational system policymakers notice more deeply the effect the application of gamification and H5P plugins have on teaching English, which can result in new curriculum development for schools.

Keywords

Main Subjects

COPYRIGHTS 
© 2024 The Author(s).  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11078-9_1
[4] Harismayanti I, Putra IN, Santosa MH. Gamification in English Teaching and Learning. Nilacakra; 2020 Nov 1.
[5] Hodent, C. Discovering the mindset for creating successful products. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group; 2022.
[6] Scott S, Niemand T, Kraus S, Oberreiner R. Let the games begin: finding the nascent entrepreneurial mindset of video gamers; 2020. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2170418
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12594
https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(81)90023-3
[11] Inchamnan W, Chomsuan J. Gamification Workflow for Growth Mindset Processes. In 2020 18th International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering (ICT&KE) 2020 Nov 18 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[13] Reinhardt KS, Elwood S. Promising practices in online training and support: Microlearning and personal learning environments to promote a growth mindset in learners. In Handbook of research on virtual training and mentoring of online instructors 2019 (pp. 298-310). IGI Global.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801  
[15] Beatty K. Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. Routledge; 2013 Nov 4. 
[16] Ellis RK. Field guide to learning management systems. ASTD learning circuits. 2009 Aug:1-8.
[17] Hyder, K, et al. The eLearning Guild’s Handbook on Synchronous e-Learning. The eLearning Guild, ed. B. Brandon; 2007: David Holcombe.
[19] Terrill, B. My coverage of lobby of the social gaming summit. Bret on social games; 2008.
[21] Simões J, Redondo R, Vilas A, Aguiar A. Using gamification to improve participation in social learning environments. Learning and Diversity in the Cities of the Future. 2015:169-86.
[22] Huotari K, Hamari J. Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective. In Proceeding of the 16th international academic MindTrek conference 2012 Oct 3 (pp. 17-22).
[23] Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining" gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments 2011 Sep 28 (pp. 9-15).
[24] Ibrahim FI, Hassan N, Fun TL. ENHANCING STUDENTS’EXPERIENCE WITH H5P LEARNING ACTIVITIES DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO TRIPLE E FRAMEWORK (ENGAGE, ENHANCE & EXTEND). UNIVERSITY CARNIVAL ON E-LEARNING (IUCEL) 2019. 2019:26.
[25] Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H. Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences 2014 Jan 6 (pp. 3025-3034). Ieee.
[26] Blake R. Distance education for second and foreign language learning. Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. 2017:157-68.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1367310
[28] Naismith L, Sharples M, Vavoula G, Lonsdale P. Literature review in mobile technologies and learning; 2004, hal-00190143.
[29] Amir B, Ralph P. Proposing a theory of gamification effectiveness. In Companion proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering 2014 May 31 (pp. 626-627).
[30] Wicaksono JA, Setiarini RB, Ikeda O, Novawan A. The use of H5P in teaching English. In The First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2020) 2021 Jan 2 (pp. 227-230). Atlantis Press. 
[31] Dweck C. Mindset-updated edition: Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. Hachette UK; 2017 Jan 12. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835
https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i1.9099
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1492337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.002
[37] Saunders SA. The impact of a growth mindset intervention on the reading achievement of at-risk adolescent students. University of Virginia; 2013. 
[38] Dweck CS. Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random house; 2006 Feb 28.  
[39] Smith M, Firth J. Psychology in the Classroom: A Teacher's Guide to what Works. Routledge; 2018 Jan 31.
[40] Seligman ME. Helplessness: On depression, development, and health. WH Freeman; 1975.
[41] Muntean CI. Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. In Proc. 6th international conference on virtual learning ICVL 2011 Oct 29 (Vol. 1, pp. 323-329).
https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
[43] Fogg BJ. A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology 2009 Apr 26 (pp. 1-7).
CAPTCHA Image