The effect of mobile learning on students' learning, concentration and academic satisfaction

Saeid, N.; Jadidi Mohammadabadi, A.

doi:10.22061/tej.2022.7665.2561

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2022.7665.2561

Abstract

Background and Objectives:Today, traditional and old methods of teaching and learning are losing their effectiveness with the advent of new technologies and methods. Learners need to find new ways to transfer knowledge and enhance learning to keep up with the ever-changing environments around them. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of mobile education on students' learning, concentration and academic satisfaction.
Methods:The present study is applied in terms of purpose and quasi-experimental in terms of method with pre-test- post-test control group. The statistical population includes 56 medical students of Kerman Azad University who were examined through a test in relation to the relevant course content and concentration and among those with lower scores, 44 students were selected. Then, they were randomly divided into two groups of control (n=22) and experimental (n=22). The two groups were also homogenized as much as possible in terms of semester, age, and level of learning and concentration. The educational materials prepared by the experts were weekly sent to the students via whatsApp and short message service (SMS). In this way, an educational video about the mentioned lesson, including theoretical and practical cases, was sent to students in 8 sessions through WhatsApp, and in session 8, students’ problems were questioned and answers were provided through WhatsApp and SMS service. The research instrument included a learning questionnaire in which 35 questions related to the curriculum were prepared and its validity was confirmed by the instructor. Savari and Oraki Concentration Skills Questionnaire (2015) which consists of 13 items and two factors, namely voluntary concentration and involuntary concentration was used. The voluntary concentration subscale consists of 8 items and the non-voluntary concentration subscale consists of 5 items. In order to determine the reliability of the above-mentioned questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha method was used and it was found to be 0.74 for the whole scale and 0.72 for the subscale of voluntary concentration skills and 0.70 for involuntary concentration skills. Moreover, the validity of the aforementioned questionnaire was examined and confirmed using Factor Analysis. The content and face validity of a researcher-made academic satisfaction questionnaire consisting of 11 items was confirmed by the opinion of 10 professors, and its reliability of 0.85 was determined by Cronbach's alpha and 0.82 by retest method. Data collection was performed in two stages before the teaching began and after the termination of teaching the entire content. The experimental group received training in 8 sessions of 2 hours. Descriptive and inferential statistics in the form of tables and figures as well as MANOVA, Analysis of Covariance-Levene’s test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were used to analyze the data.
Findings: The results showed that mobile learning has a significant effect on an effect on students' learning, concentration skills and academic satisfaction. This means that mobile learning can increase students' learning, concentration skills and academic satisfaction.
Conclusions: Based on the findings, mobile learning due to its availability, portability and easy access to the content at any time can be a good way to teach different educational topics to students. Mobile learning also allows people to access learning content anytime anywhere. Individuals can also have access to valuable educational materials that enhance their learning quality and academic satisfaction. Due to the high flexibility of this type of education, students can learn according to their circumstances and based on their mental readiness which, in turn, prevents distraction and reduces interfering factors in concentration.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1401.16.3.1.7

Main Subjects

Mobile learning

COPYRIGHTS
©2022 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Zare H, Sarmadi M R, Mohammadabadi A. Investigating the relationship between learning strategies and comprehension. The First Scientific Conference on Educational Sciences and Psychology; Social and Cultural Damages of Iran: 2015: Tehran, Iran.

[2] Seif A A. [Translation of Introduction to learning theories]. Hergenhan B R, Olson M (Author). Tehran: Doran Publications; 2020.

[3] Sevari K, Oraki M. [Construction and validation of the focus skills questionnaire]. Educational Measurement. 2017; 22(6): 83-69. Persian.

[4] Lin H Y, Chou T J. The development of an attention test for elementary school children. Bulletin of Special Education. 2010; 35(2): 29-42.

[5] Hassanein K, Head M, Wang F. Understanding student satisfaction in A mobile learning environment: The role of internal and external facilitators’.2010 Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business And 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (Icmb-Gmr): 2010; 25(2):289–296.

[6] Megha Kumar A. Customer satisfaction with lowcost airlines in India. South Asian Journal of Tourism and Heritage.2009; 27(2): 119-134.

[7] Abedini Y, Mokhtari, M M. [Causal model of relationship motivation of English language progress and performance: The mediating and metacognitive role of academic aid in mobile learning]. Journal of Research in School and Virtual Learning. 2012; 3(11): 7-16. Persian.

[8] Sarani H, Ayati M, Naderi F. [The effect of teaching English through mobile phones and e-mail on students' learning and motivation for progress]. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2015; 20(4): 141-159. Persian.

[9] Aiti M, Sarani H. [Confirmation of educational method via mobile phone on the motivation and attitude of English language students]. Scientific Research Journal of Educational Technology. 2011; 7(1):36-48. Persian.

[10] Zamani B I, Babri, H, Mousavi, S. [Factors related to the attitude of Isfahan medical students to accept learning through Mobile phones using the technology acceptance model]. Developmental Steps in Medical Education. 2012; 9(2): 110-117. Persian.

[11] Babazadeh Kamangar M, Jahanian I, Gholinia H, Abbaszadeh H. [A preliminary study of the impact of mobile phone-based education on the learning level of dental students in practical oral pathology]. Journal of Educational Development in Medical Sciences. 2016; 9 (22): 21-26. Persian.

[12] Sadoughi M, Mohammad Salehi Z. [Factors affecting mobile acceptance of learning between students of Tabriz university and Tabriz university of medical sciences]. Teaching Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2017; 10 (6): 448-436. Persian.

[13] Sadoughi Ma, Mohammad Salehi Z. [Relationship between traumatic cellphone use and students']. Academic Performance, Educational, Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2017; 10(2): 42-54. Persian.

[14] Rezaei Rad, M, Fallah, E. [The effect of mobile education on students' achievement motivation, self-concept and academic achievement in Arabic language course]. Research in Curriculum Planning. 2015; 2(16): 1-13. Persian.

[15] Doshman Ziari E. [Identification and ranking of components affecting mobile learning]. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Knowledge Interdisciplinary Studies. 2017; 8(30): 234 – 207. Persian.

[16] Zargham M, Shobiri M, Sarmadi M R. [Analysis of the components explaining the tendency of students to use mobile learning technology in environmental education]. Research in School Learning. 2015; 14 (6): 25-38. Persian.

[17] Shaykh Al-Islami V, Mohammad Ismaili N, Gholipour, A. [Measuring the effectiveness of using mobile phones in behavioral education]. Public Management Research. 2015; 7 (25): 56-35. Persian.

[18] Allahi Z, Zarei Zavaraki I, Sharifi Daramadi P, Norouzi D, Delavar A. [The effectiveness of mobile-assisted instruction on learning, achievement motivation and cooperation among students with visual impairment]. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2015; 23(6):1-26. Persian.

[19] Tabebordbar F. [The impact of mobile education on students' psychological and academic aspects]. Curriculum Research. 2015; 6 (1):23-38. Persian.

[20] Sha L, Looi Ck, Chen W, Zhang Bh. Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning. 2012; 28(4): 366-378.

[21] Wang L. Effectiveness of text-based mobile learning applications: case studies in tertiary education [Unpublished master's thesis]. Palmerston North, New Zealand: University of Massey; 2009.

[22] Kumar B. Mobile learning and student retention. The International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning. 2007; 8(2).

[23] Ramezanikhah M. The Effect of Mobile Language Teaching on Motivation and Tacit Learning of Iranian Language Learners, Master Thesis, Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University,2017.

[24] Jafari P. Teaching and learning through mobile phones and the attitude of students of amol non-profit institute towards it [master’s thesis]. Amol, Iran: Amol Higher education institute, faculty of humanities; 2017.

[25] Yao Ts, Kuo E, Tzu Ch, the effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education. 2016; 94(14): 252-275.

[26] Kusnekoff J, Munz S, Titsworth S. Mobile phones in the classroom: examining the effects of texting, twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education. 2015; 64(3): 344- 365.

[27] Moji F, Shah Amir M S. Using mobile phones to improve the teaching of physics concepts. The Third National School Conference Tomorrow, 2015.

[28] Naderi, F, Ayati M, Zare Bidaki M, Akbari Borang M. [The effect of mobile education method on metacognitive self-regulation and attitude of paramedical students]. Education in Medical Sciences. 2013; 13 (11): 1010-1001.

[29] Giunta A, Distefani A, Chimenti S. Mobile phones: a role in teaching dermatology? Dermatology. 2010; 222(1):22-23.

[30] Pourhassani M. Evaluating the effectiveness of mobile learning method in academic achievement and learners' attitudes and comparing it with common teaching methods [master’s thesis]. Tehran, Iran; Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University, Faculty of Basic Sciences; 2012.

[31] Zare Bidaki M, Yousefi M, Malaki Moghadam H, Rajabpour A, Sanati A, Nazari A. [The effect of clip-based education on learning and satisfaction in students' microbiology course]. Scientific Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences; 25 Special Letter of Medical Education. 2017;14(8): 37 – 45. Persian.

[32] Maha A, Heba M. Mobile applications’ impact on student performance and satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2017; 14 (4): 102-112.

[33] Torabi M, Ebrahimi Mehrabani Sh. [Investigating the tendency to use mobile learning with regard to the role of technical innovations among graduate students of Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan branch]. Third International Conference on Accounting and Management: 2015.

[34] Mikulas W L. Mindfulness, self-control and personal growth. In M. G. T. Kwee (Ed.), Psychotherapy, meditation, and health. London: East-West Publications; 1990. p. 151- 164.

[35] Edraki M, Rambod M, Abdoli R. [The relationship between study satisfaction and academic achievement in nursing students]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 11 (1): 32-39. Persian.

[36] Behnampour N, Heshmati H, Rahimi S. [Satisfaction of students of paramedical and health schools of Golestan university of medical sciences with the field of study in 2011]. Education In Medical Sciences. 2012; 12 (8): 616-618. Persian.

[37] Mikulas, W L. The Integrative Helper: Convergence of Eastern and Western Traditions. Pacific Grove, Ca: Brooks/Cole; 2002.

[38] Song Y, Wong Lh, Looi Ck. Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies. Education Technology Research Development. 2012; 12 (60): 679-701.

[39] Ozdamlia F, Cavusb N. Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 14 (28):937-942.