Investigation of spatial ability of male and female students in 10th and 11th grade according to spatial visualization, mental rotation, and spatial orientation factors

Reyhani, E.; Ghasemi, F.; Rahimi, Z.

doi:10.22061/tej.2020.6461.2404

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Mathematics, Faculty of sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University (ATU), Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2020.6461.2404

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In the turn of present century, dramatic changes have taken place in education and society. Among these changes, the change from an industrial to a knowledge-based society, the change from information technology and new information in various scientific fields, and the change in occupations can be mentioned. As a result, education has faced many shortcomings based on the level of the expectations of the society and its outputs. Due to the changes in the objective of the educational systems and the changes in the dimensions of people's lives, the teacher researcher paradigm has been considered by most teacher training systems in recent years, and that is why, it has led to some reforms in teacher training programs. The main and most important components of teacher training, curriculum, consists of goals, content, teaching method and evaluation. The present study explains the goals of the curriculum based on a teacher-researcher training at Farhangian University. The goals of the study are comprised of three areas of knowledge, competence, and attitude. According to the objectives of the study a mixed research method of the exploratory type was used which consists of two qualitative and quantitative stages. In the qualitative stage interpretive phenomenological method of data collection tool was used and In the quantitative stage, a descriptive survey method was utilized.
Methods:Inthe qualitative section, the research population comprised of the experts in the field of teacher training among which the appropriate instances were selected through targeted sampling and the required information was collected through a semi-structured interview. Theoretical saturation was achieved from interviews with 15 experts. In the analysis of the text of the interview the interpretive content analysis was used. To validate the data, credibility, transferability, reliability and validation were used. In the quantitative stage, the research population were the faculty members of different campuses of Farhangian University, among which four provinces were selected as the sample. The multi-stage cluster sampling method was used to select the sample and using Cochran's formula 274 people were selected among the faculty members of campuses and provincial centers. Data collection was done through a researcher-made questionnaire which was extracted from the qualitative part of the research. The data were analyzed by using a single sample T-test and Friedman test.
Findings:In this study, the goals of the curriculum were explained in terms of knowledge, ability and attitude. The results showed that the area of knowledge includes reflection, critical thinking, scientific expertise and research knowledge. The area of ability is comprised of the ability to perform research, to write, to be creative, to act systematically, to be independent and self-sufficient; and the area of the attitude includes interest in research and having no prejudice and stereotypes. The quantitative results of the study also showed that the components of attention and accuracy in relation to the issues of education in the field of knowledge, students' ability to self-assess; in the area of ability, and avoidance of prejudice and black and white thinking, and in the area of attitude received the most attention by the faculty members. There is clear evidence of a gap between the goals of the Farhangian University at the executive level in terms of knowledge, ability and attitude.
Conclusion: This study showed that the goals of the teacher taining curriculum need a general reformation at the executive level. It is important to pay attention to all areas of goals including knowledge, ability, and attitude and It is necessary to pay equal attention to all areas and to combine theoretical courses with the required practical work in teacher training programs.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1400.15.2.14.1

Main Subjects

Modern Educational Approaches

COPYRIGHTS
©2021 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Safi A. The organization, Rules and Regulation of Education in Iran. Tehran: SAMT: 2000. Persion.

[2] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Building a high-quality teaching profession, lessons from around the world.2011.

[3] Brouwer N, Korthagen F. A Can teacher education make a difference? American Educational Research Journal.2005. 42(1): 153-224.

[4] Darling-Hammond L, Bransford J. (Eds.). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons2005.

[5] Darling-Hammond L, Youngs P. Defining“highly qualified teachers:” What does “scientificallybased research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher. 2002; 31(9): 13-25.

[6] Day C, Day S P, Qing K, Stobart G. Committed for life? Variations in -teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. In M. Bayer (Ed.), Teachers’ career trajectories and work lives. Dordrecht: Springer 2009. (pp. 49–70).

[7] Hanushek E A. Publicly provided education. In Auerbach AJ, Feldstein. M (eds.), Handbook of public economics. Amsterdam North Holland: 2002. Vol. 4. pp. 2045–2141.

[8] Barber M, Mourshed M. How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. London, England: McKinsey. 2007.

[9] Safi A. [history of development of Teacher education in contemporary Iranian education: Past, present, and future].Quarterly Journal of Education. 2008; 24(4): 173-204. Persian.

[10] Mehr Mohammadi M. Rethinking the teaching-learning and teacher training process. Tehran: Madraseh Publication: 2000. Persian.

[11] Samadi M. [Study the role of teachers' professional knowledge and self-efficacy on their positive and negative communication methods with students]. Clinical Pshology Studies. 2013. 9(17): 105-125. Persian.

[12]DaneshPeguh Z, Farzad V. [Evaluating teachers' professional skills in the primary school]. Educationai Innovations. 2006. 18(5): 135-170. Persian.

[13] Karimi F. [Studying the professional competences of elementary teachers]. Educational Leadership and Management Quarterly. 2008; 2(5): 151-166. Persian.

[14] Dehghan A, Mehram B, Karami M. [Evaluation of the curriculum of Farhangian University in terms of training a researcher (Case study: Shahid Beheshti and Shahid Hasheminejad campuses)]. Higher Education Curriculum Studies: 2016; 7(13): 78-100. Persian.

[15] Statute of Farhangian University. Vice Chancellor for Education and Research, Tehran: Farhangian University.2012.

[16] Husen T. Research Paradigms in Education, The International Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford: Pergamon: 1994.

[17] Scott D, Morrison M. Key Ideas in Educational Research. London: Continuum. 2006.

[18] Toom A, Kynaslahti H, Krokfors L, Jyrhama R, Byman R, Stenberg K, et al. Experiences of a research based approach to teacher education: suggestions for future policies. European Journal of Education. 2010; 45(2). PartII.

[19] Stenhouse LA. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd; 1975.

[20] Schön D A. The reflective practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.

[21] Korthagen FAJ, Kessels JPAM. Linking theory and practice: changing the pedagogy of teacher Education. Education Researcher.1999.4 (28)4-17.

[22] Beyer LE, Zeichner K. Teacher education and educational foundation: A plea for discontent. Journal of Teacher Education. 1982. 33(3), 18-23.

[23] Lanier J. Teacher education: Needed research and practice for the preparation of teaching professionals. In Corrigan, D. Palmer, Alexander, P (Eds), The future of teacher education. College Station: Texas A& M University: 1982.13-36.

[24] Zeichner K M, Liston D P. Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review. 1987; 57(1): 23–48.

[25] Cochran-Smith M. The problem of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. 2004; 55(4): 229 -295.

[26] Schleicher A. (ed). Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the21st Century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing; 2012.

[27] Rasmussen J, Bayer M. Comparative study of teaching content in teacher education programmes in Canada, Denmark, Finland and Singapore. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2014; 46(6): 798-818.

[28] Ahmadi H. Comparison of Methods of Scientific Promotion of Elementary Teachers in Iran, Germany, Japan. [master’s thesis]. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University. 2014. Persian.

[29] Gillham B. The Research Interview. London: Rautledge; 2000.

[30] Bazargan A. Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methodology: Common approaches in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Didar Publication; 2008. Persian.

[31] Lincoln Y S, Guba E. Naturalistic enquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage; 1985.

[32] Holloway I. Qualitative Research in Health Care. Open University Press; 2005.