Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

2 Information Technology, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Computer Engineering - Software, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

One of the most important parameters in personalization of adaptive learning web-based educational systems is learning style. Up to now, various  learning styles proposed and this paper tries to evaluate the efficiency of using one of them, Jackson model. In this study, we  categorized students as model says and delivered learning content matched to each group learning style.  Findings of the study indicate differences in performance between matched and non-matched students in one case of the study and in the other case, demonstrate no significant difference. Although these results pertain to an undergraduate educational session, however our proposed framework is general enough to be applied to effective and efficient pedagogy in any area at any level.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]Brusilovsky P. and Conlan O., From Learning Objects to Adaptive Content Services for ELearning, in Architecture Solutions for ELearning Systems, C. Pahl, Editor. 2007, Idea Group Inc: Hershey. pp. 243-261. [2]Kobsa A., Generic User Modeling Systems, User Modeling and User-Adaptived Interaction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 46-93. [3]Viola S.R., Graf S., Kinshuk and Leo T., Investigating relationships within the Index of Learning Styles: a data driven approach, Interactive Technology & Smart Education, 2007, pp. 7-18 [4] Entwistle N., Styles of learning and teaching, London, David Fulton, 1998. [5] Jackson C.J., Manual of the Learning Styles Profiler, Available through [6] http://www.cymeon.com [7]Jackson C.J., Measurement issues concerning a personality model spanning temperament, character, and experience. In Boyle G., Matthews G. and Saklofske D. Handbook of Personality and Testing, Sage Publishers, 2008. [8]Jackson C.J., Hob man E., Jimmies on N. and Martin R. (2009). Comparing Different Approach and Avoidance Models of Learning and Personality in the Prediction of Work, University and Leadership Outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, 130. Preprint. DOI: 10.1348/000712608X322900. [9]Jackson C.J., Using the hybrid model of learning in personality to predict performance in the workplace. 8th IOP Conference, Conference Proceedings, Manly, Sydney, Australia, 2528, June, 2009, pp.75-79. ]11 ]سیف علیاکبر، روانشناسی پرورشی نوین: روان- شناسی یادگیری و آموزش، نشر دوران، ویرایش ششم، 1378. ]11 ]سرمد زهره، بازرگان عباس، حجازی الهه، روشهای تحقیق در علوم رفتاری، مؤسسه انتشارات آگاه، چاپ دهم، 1373. ]12 ]سیادتی ملودی، تقییاره فتانه، بررسی تطبیقی ابزارهای تألیف محتوا در آموزش الکترونیکی، مجموعه مقاالت همایش یادگیری الکترونیکی، زنجان، ایران، 1375 ،صفحههای 42 الی 58. ]13 ]عروجی فاطمه، تقییاره فتانه، پورتال یادگیری معنایی جایگزینی برای سیستم مدیریت یادگیری، چهارمین کنفرانس یادگیری الکترونیکی، تهران، ایران، 1377.
CAPTCHA Image