Validating Printed and Electronic Version of Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS)

Aliabadi, Kh.; Delavar, A.; Nili, M.R; Iziy, M.

doi:10.22061/jte.2018.4209.2025

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Educational Technology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Assessment and Measurement, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.4209.2025

Abstract

Background and Objective: The educational system, each decade, faces special audience as learners. These students have special educational characteristics, needs, interests, and preferences that significantly improve the policies, quantity, and quality of the educational system services. The emergence of a generational phenomenon in academic discourses are addressed with themes such as "students of this period of time" and issues such as the differences between the students of the current period of time and the past with respect to motivation, scientific perseverance, academic interests, and academic ethics. The subject of the differences between the learners of one period and another is referred to as the generation gap. Generational issues are one of the most important themes in the field of education, especially higher education. In the early years of the 21^st century, some theories about the new generation entering universities were proposed stating that these learners have certain characteristics due to their birth and growth in the age of technology. Labels such as Digital Natives, Millennial, Network Generation, and Digital Learner have been set. The present study aims to validate the Digital Native Characteristics Scale (DNAS).
Methods: Regarding to the issue of validity consideration in electronic versions of the instruments; therefore, electronic and printed versions of this scale validated by descriptive-survey method. The population included 7320 undergraduate students of Birjand University who were studying in the academic year 2017-2018. The number of samples in the present study was 374 students who selected from 10 faculties of Birjand University based on the table of sample size of Krejcie and Morgan and using cluster sampling method. The sampling method was such that one class was randomly selected in each faculty, and about 50% of the class population randomly completed the Digital Natives Measurement Scale electronically and the other 50% in print.
Findings: The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that both electronic and printed versions had satisfactory validity and reliability. The scale revealed 4 features for digital natives, including: (1) grow up with technology; (2) reliance on the graphic in communication; (3) multitasking; and (4) instant feedback. The electronic version and printed version explained 65.71% and 62.43% of the variance respectively. The total reliability was obtained by Cronbach alpha for the electronic and printed version were α = 0.89 and α = 0.91 respectively. All four identified components in both print and electronic versions had optimum reliability.
Conclusion: Comparing the psychometric characteristics of the two electronic and printed formats in the present study did not show a significant difference between these versions. According to the research findings that have confirmed the construct validity and reliability of this scale, this instrument can be used in future research for the purpose of measuring the characteristics of digital natives in Iranian culture and at the academic community. However, pre-university courses it require more research. Also, this instrument can be used for educational design and teaching purposes by educational designers and can be used to adapt the training to the characteristics of this generation. Despite the optimal validity and reliability of the scale in this research, it is recommended that new instruments be designed and validated in future research considering the findings of the present study and using generational theories in Iran.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1398.14.1.12.6

Main Subjects

Electronic learning- virtual

COPYRIGHTS
©2020 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Gallardo-Echenique EE, Marqués-Molías L, Bullen M, Strijbos J-W. Let’s talk about digital learners in the digital era. The International Review of research in open and distributed learning. 2015; 16(3).

[2] Brown C, Czerniewicz L. Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2010; 26(5):357-69.

[3] Cambiano RL, De Vore JB, Harvey RL. Learning style preferences of the cohorts: Generation X, baby boomers, and the silent generation. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning.

[4] Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon. 2001; 9(5):1-6.

[5] Oblinger D. Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the "New Students.".38(4).

[6] Frand J. The information-age mindset. Changes in students and implications for higher education. Educause 2000; September/October: 15-24. EDUCAUSE Review. 2000; 35(5):14-24.

[7] Schwieger D, Ladwig C. Reaching and retaining the next generation: Adapting to the expectations of Gen Z in the classroom. Information Systems Education Journal. 2018 Jun 1; 16(3):45.

[8] Tapscott D. Grown Up Digital. How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. International Journal of Market Research. 2010; 52(1):139.

[9] Virkus S. Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in LIS Education: Experiences at Tallinn University, Estonia. 2008; 42(3):262-74.

[10] Shakarami A, Hajhashemi K, Caltabiano N. Compensation still matters: language learning strategies in the third millennium ESL learners. Available at SSRN 3032963. 2017 Sep 6.

[11] Taylor PE, Keeter SE. Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change. 2010.

[12] O’Connell TS, Dyment JE. ‘I’m just not that comfortable with technology’: student perceptions of and preferences for Web 2.0 technologies in reflective journals. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2016 May 3; 40(3):392-411.

[13] Shtepura A. The impact of digital technology on digital natives’ learning: American outlook. Comparative Professional Pedagogy. 2018 Jun 1; 8(2):128-33.

[14] Rapetti E, Cantoni L. “Digital Natives” and learning with the ICTs. The “GenY@ work” research in Ticino, Switzerland. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society. 2010; 6(1):39-49.

[15] Wilkerson M. The Effect of Enrichment on the Utilization of and the Perceived Effectiveness of Millennial Theory-Based Pedagogies: A Comparative Quantitative Study. 2014.

[16] DeBard R. Millennials Coming to College. 2004.

[17] Bullen M, Morgan T, Belfer K, Qayyum A. The net generation in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. International Journal of Excellence in E-Learning. 2009; 2(1):1-13.

[18] Kennedy GE, Judd TS, Churchward A, Gray K, Krause K-L. First Year Students' Experiences with Technology: Are They Really Digital Natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2008; 24(1):108-22.

[19] Jones C, Ramanau R, Cross S, Healing G. Net Generation or Digital Natives: Is There a Distinct New Generation Entering University? Computers & Education. 2010; 54(3):722-32.

[20] Margaryan A, Littlejohn A, Vojt G. Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students' Use of Digital Technologies. Computers & Education. 2011; 56(2):429-40.

[21] Thompson P. The Digital Natives as Learners: Technology Use Patterns and Approaches to Learning. Computers & Education. 2013; 65:12-33.

[22] Russo T. Examining Millennial Characterizations as Guidance for Choosing Classroom Strategy Changes. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2013; 7(2

[23] Teo T. An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). Computers & Education. 2013; 67:51-7.

[24] Ursavaş ÖF, Yurdakul IK, Türk M, Mcilroy D. Measurement Invariance of the Digital Natives Assessment Scale Across Gender in a Sample of Turkish University Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2016; 54(4):513-30.

[25] Wiersma W. The validity of surveys: Online and offline. Oxford Internet Institute; 2013.

[26] Teo T, Kabakçi Yurdakul I, Ursavas ÖF. Exploring the Digital Natives among Pre-Service Teachers in Turkey: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Digital Native Assessment Scale. 2016; 24(6):1231-44.

[27] Ursavas ÖF, Kabakçi Yurdakul I, Türk M, McIlroy D. Measurement Invariance of the Digital Natives Assessment Scale across Gender in a Sample of Turkish University Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2016; 54(4):513-30.