] Ajjan Haya, Hartshorne Richard, Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2 technologies: Theory and empirical tests, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol.11, No. 2, 2008, pp.71-80. [2] Exter Kristin den, Rowe Stephen, Boyd William, Lloyd David, Using Web 2 Technologies for Collaborative Learning in Distance Education—Case Studies from an Australian University, Future Internet, 4, 2012, pp.216-237. [3] Meyer, K.A., A comparison of Web 2 tools in a doctoral course, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol.13, No.4, 2010, pp.226-232. [4] Su Addison Y.S, Yang Stephen J.H, Hwang Wu-Yuin, Zhang Jia, A Web 2-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments, Computers & Education, Vol. 55, No.2, 2010, pp. 752-766. [5] Yaghoobi, J., Factors influencing the adoption and usage of Internet in teaching and research activities of faculty and graduate students of Agricultural Extension and Education, 2001, Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University, Agricultural Extension and Education MSc Thesis. [6] Murugesan, S., Understanding Web 2, IT professional, Vol. 9, No.4, 2007, pp.43-41. [7] Cavus Nadire, Kanbul Sezer, Designation of Web 2 tools expected by the students on technology-based learning environment, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.2, No.2, 2010, pp. 5824-5829. [8] Augustsson, G., Web 2, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol.13, No.4, 2010, pp.197-205. [9] Baltaci-Goktalay Sehnaz, Ozdilek Zehra, Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about web 2 technologies, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.2, No.2, 2010, pp.4737-4741. [10] El Helou, S., Gillet D., Salzmann C., Yu, C.M., A Study of the Acceptability of a Web 2 Application by Higher-education Students undertaking Collaborative Laboratory Activities, Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI'09), 2009, IEEE, pp. 117- 125. [11] Huang Wen-Hao David, Hood Denice Ward, Yoo Sun Joo, Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2 applications for learning in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol.16, 2013, pp.57-65. [12] Wu Mei-Ying, Chou Han-Ping, Weng Yung-Chien, Huang Yen-Han, A Study of Web 2 Website Usage Behavior Using TAM 2, Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference, 2008, IEEE, DOI 10.1109/APSCC.2008.92. [13] Lu, Y., Zhou T., Wang B., Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.25, No.1, 2008, pp.29-39. طاهره یعقوبی و همکاران 24 نشریه علمی پژوهشی فناوری آموزش، جلد 9 ،شماره 1 ،پاییز 1191 [14] Kawka Marta, Larkin Kevin, Wrestling and Wrangling with a Worrisome Wiki: An Account of Pedagogical Change in the use of a Web 2 technology in a First Year Education Course, Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, Vol.8, No.1, 2011, pp.38-48. [15] Duke, R.A., Students' learning experiences with the Web 2 tool MyPortfolio: a case study of one high school classroom, 2010, MSc thesis, Victoria University of Wellington. [16] Luo Lili,Web 2 Integration in Information Literacy Instruction: An Overview, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 36, No.1, 2009, pp. 32–40 [17] Usluel, Y.K., Mazman, S.G., Adoption of Web 2 tools in distance education, ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.1, No.1, 2009, pp.818-823. [18] Sevindik Tuncay, Demirkeser Necmi, Cömert Zafer,Virtual education environments and web mining, ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.2, No.2, 2010, pp.5120-5124. [19] Ellison N.B., Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship, Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, Vol.13, No.1, 2007, pp.210-230. Web 2 Learner-con tent Inte raction Learner- Instuctor Interaction Learner- Learner Interaction Learner – Interface Ine raction Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour (DT PB) Theory o f Planned Behaviour (T PB) Ta Web 2 Learner-con tent Inte raction Learner- Instuctor Interaction Learner- Learner Interaction Learner – Interface Ine raction Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour (DT PB) Theory o f Planned Behaviour (T PB) g Track Back Pingback Photo Blog or Photo Log Video Blog or vlog Podcast Mblog Wikiwiki FAQ Technology Acceptance Model (TAM3) Extended Technol ogy Acceptance Model (TAM2) Determinants of Pe rceived Ease of Use Perceived Usefulness (PU) Behavioral Intention (BI) Perceived Ease of Use (P EOU) Use Behavior (USE ) Job Relevance (REL) Result Demonstrability (R ES) Organizational Suppo rt (O S) Computer Self Ef ficacy (CS E) Computer Anxiety (CANX) Peer Suppo rt (P S) Face Validity Confirmato ry Factor A nalysis (CFA) Structural Equatio n Models (SME) [20] Venkatesh Viswanath, Davis Fred D., A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, Vol. 46, No.2, 2000, pp.186-204. [21] Venkatesh,V., Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research, Vol.11, No.4, 2000, 342-365. [22] Venkatesh,V., Bala, H., Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, Decision Science, Vol.39, No.2, 2008, pp.273-315. [23] Sheini Dashtgoli, Golestane, Internet Technologies Adoption in National Iranian South Oil Company, 2009, Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University, MSc Thesis in Information Technology. [24] Kalantari, Kh., Structural equation modeling in social research - economic, 2009, Tehran: Culture of Saba. [25] Salehi, S., Factors affecting attitudes and intentions Agriculture Organization of Fars and Khuzestan provinces to the application of precision farming technologies, 2007, Ahvaz Ramin University, Master of Agricultural Extension and Education.