Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Educational Studies and Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

10.22061/tej.2026.11082.3103

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This research aims to examine the impact of Scratch-based programming instruction grounded in the STEAM approach on learners’ critical thinking. Programming instruction using Scratch—a visual, block-based programming language—can significantly enhance critical thinking skills and facilitate the learning of programming content. This approach, rooted in STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics), helps learners acquire the essential skills needed in the digital age through practical and interactive methods. The utilization of Scratch, owing to its visual features and block-based structure that enables a hands-on experience of fundamental programming concepts, can effectively bridge the gap between theory and practice while reinforcing students’ cognitive and logical abilities. Previous research has demonstrated that integrating interactive instructional methods with multimedia environments increases self-efficacy, creativity, and learner engagement with educational content. Consequently, employing Scratch in the instructional process not only familiarizes students with basic programming concepts but also boosts their learning motivation and active participation in developing the skills required for the digital era. This study aims to provide a scientific foundation for designing interdisciplinary courses that prepare students for future challenges by precisely examining the educational effects of Scratch.
Methods: The current research, based on its objective, application, and work approach, is quasi-experimental, using a pretest-posttest design with three groups: one control and two experimental groups. Out of 48 participants, 16 were assigned to the control group, 16 to the group taught with the STEAM approach, and 16 to the traditional teaching group. The population of this research includes all sixth-grade female students in Karaj city. A school with two sixth-grade classes was randomly selected. In order to gather the required data, both library and field research methods were utilized. In addition to eight sessions of Scratch programming teaching with the STEAM approach, Rick's Critical Thinking Questionnaire was used for the critical thinking variable, and a researcher-made questionnaire was used for the programming content learning variable.
Findings: The results showed that the programming education using Scratch software based on the STEAM approach has been influential on learners’ critical thinking and programming content learning. The findings indicate that Scratch-based programming instruction within the STEAM framework has a significant positive impact on critical thinking components, specifically creativity (coefficient= 0.421), cognitive engagement (coefficient= 0.233), and cognitive maturity (coefficient= 0.267).
Conclusion: The outcomes indicate that programming education and cognitive maturity in critical thinking have a positive correlation with each other, and as students' programming skills increase, their cognitive maturity in critical thinking also increases. In other words, as programming skills increase, improvements are observed in students' creativity, intellectual participation, and cognitive maturity, which underscores the importance of designing interdisciplinary courses tailored to learners’ needs for developing critical thinking and self-regulatory abilities.

Keywords

Main Subjects

COPYRIGHTS 
© 2025 The Author(s).  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)  

[1] Inomjonovna RI. STEAM education is one of the main trends in the world. J New Century Innov. 2023;21(2):27–32.
[2] Erol A, Erol M, Basaran M. The effect of STEAM education with tales on problem solving and creativity skills. Eur Early Child Educ Res J. 2023;31(2):243–258.
[4] Agung S, Nanto D, Adrefiza A, Diamah A, Ramayanti I, editors. ICEMS 2019: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education in Muslim Society, ICEMS 2019, 30 September-01 October 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia. European Alliance for Innovation; 2020 Jan 14.
doi: 10.34641/ctestem.2022.451.
[6] Deiner A, Feldmeier P, Fraser G, Schweikl S, Wang W. Automated test generation for Scratch programs. Empir Softw Eng. 2023;28(3):79.
[9] Brees N, Camp R, Senlgar R. Analysis of psychological data using SPSS. In: Aliabadi K, Samadi SA, editors. Tehran: Nashr-e Doran; 1384. (First edition; originally published 2003).
[10] Chistyakov AA, Zhdanov SP, Avdeeva EL, Dyadichenko EA, Kunitsyna ML, Yagudina RI. Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 023;19(5):em2256.
[11] Mohammadi G, Khamforush K, Hasani R. Effectiveness of programming education using a virtual environment (Scratch) in improving programming skills. Fanavari Etelaat va Ertebat dar Oloum-e Tarbiyat. 1399;11(1):101–118.
[12] Rezban S. Effect of programming education using Scratch on problem solving skills and creativity of students. [Master’s thesis]. University of Arak; 1397.
doi: 10.22061/tej.2023.9332.2832.
[14] Ortiz-Colon AM, Maroto Romo JL. Teaching with Scratch in compulsory secondary education. Int Fed Eng Educ Societies. 2016.
doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i4.24938.
[19] Fanchamps LJA, Vansteenkiste M. The effect of visual programming environments on the development of computational thinking and the influence of self-regulating ability in upper primary school children. Asia-Pacific Soc Comput Educ. 2023.
doi: 10.1080/00220671.2021.1975090.
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7396568.
[27] Noori Motlagh M. Presentation of an algorithm and programming education protocol for elementary school children. [Master’s thesis]. Shiraz University; 1391.
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6449939.
[29] Development Program for Teachers Focused on STEM. Integr J STEM. [Details not provided].
[30] Miller DR. [Article title not available]. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67(1–4):890–897.
[31] Bozorg Nejad Kalagar N. Design of a strategy for improving elementary education. [Master’s thesis]. Alzahra University (South); 1397.
[32] Ricketts, J. C., Rudd, R. D. . Critical Thinking Skills of Selected Youth Leaders: the Efficacy of Critical Thinking Disposition, Leaders and Academic Performance, Journal of Agricultural ducation, 2005;46 (1): 32-43.
CAPTCHA Image