Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of ART and Architecture, Bi.C., Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran

2 Department of Urbanism, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

10.22061/tej.2025.11688.3181

Abstract

Background and Objective: The physical Form of learning environments and their environmental affordances significantly influence learners’ behavioral patterns and educational needs. Despite Iran’s emphasis on skill-oriented pedagogy and the theoretical alignment between architectural design and environmental psychology, many academic spaces—such as the Faculty of Skills and Entrepreneurship at Islamic Azad University of Mashhad—lack integration of these principles. This gap manifests in inadequate physical comfort, diminished place attachment, and reduced educational effectiveness. The research underscores the scattered yet substantial scholarly discourse on spatial design, environmental potentials, and learning behavior, while noting the absence of a unified conceptual model. To address this, the study proposes a framework rooted in environmental psychology to guide the architectural design of skill-based higher education centers. The model aspires to be both comprehensive and adaptable, enhancing spatial responsiveness to pedagogical needs. The Faculty of Skills and Entrepreneurship serves as a contextual case study, supporting the framework’s application, validation, and generalization across similar educational environments
Methods: This study employed a qualitative methodology based on grounded theory, using open, axial, and selective coding through MAXQDA software. Data were gathered via document analysis, surveys, and expert Delphi interviews. The conceptual model was developed and structured using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) to hierarchize key variables.
Findings: This study developed a conceptual model specific to the architectural setting of the Faculty of Skills and Entrepreneurship at Islamic Azad University of Mashhad. Expert insights guided the thematic grouping of open and axial coding results into 70 identifiers and 50 attributes. Through Delphi validation, 6 core dimensions and 28 components related to environmental psychology in educational spaces were identified. MAXQDA analysis enabled the graphical visualization of these variables in a hierarchical tree structure. Finally, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) defined the causal relationships among the model’s key dimensions. Using MAXQDA and ISM, the study categorized environmental psychology factors into 4 observable and 20 latent variables.
Conclusion: on of variables using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method indicated that the emotional and functional dimensions occupy Levels 1 and 2, respectively, while the socio-cultural and meaning-making dimensions were positioned at Level 3. These hierarchical levels reflected the relative degree of influence each dimension exerts on the architectural form.

Keywords

Main Subjects

COPYRIGHTS 
© 2025 The Author(s).  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)  

[1] Mokaram Doust H, Khosrojerdi N. A DELICATE DESIGN ON EDUCATIONAL SPACES (ELEMENTARY). Tehran: Tahan Publications; 2012. [In Persian]
[2] Shah cheraghi A, Bandar Abad A. Environed in Environment: Application of Environmental Psychology in Architecture and Urban Design.Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publications; 1394. [In Persian]
[9] Barrett PS, Zhang Y, Davies F, Barrett LC. Clever classrooms: Summary report of the HEAD project; 2015.
[10] Mofidi Nejad N, Khosrojerdi N. Principles of Educational Complex Design. Mashhad: Kasra Publications; 2018. [In Persian]
[11] Ainifar A. [Translation of Research methods in architecture]. Groth L, Wang D (Authors). Tehran: University Tehran Publications; 2019. [In Persian]
[12] Hasrati M. An Introduction to the Qualitative Method of Grounded Theory. Biannual scientific-research journal of language and linguistics. 2006; 2(3): 75-86. [In Persian]
[13] Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications; 2006.
[14] Stern, P. N. Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes In Glaser, B. (Ed.) More grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley: CA: Sociology Press; 1994: 116-126.
[15] Pandit N R. The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method. The qualitative report. 1996; 2(4):1-15.
https://doi: 10.22034/aaud.2020.192148.1922.
[18] Zamani E, Nasr Isfahani A R. Physical and cultural characteristics of instructional spaces in four developed countries from the viewpoints of Iranian parents and students. Journal of Educational Innovations. 2007; 6(5): 55-84. [In Persian]
[19] Abbaszadeh Diz F, Rashid Kalvir H, Rezaei Sharif A. Analysis of Student Satisfaction from Physical Components of School with an Emphasis on Cooperative Learning: Case Study: Boys' Secondary Schools in Tabriz. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING[Internet].2019; 11(23) :51-71. [In Persian]
https://doi: 10.22034/aaud.2024.365265.2725.
[23] Pakzad j. The ABC of Environmental Psychology for Designers.  Armanshahr Publications; 2011.
[24] Ata S, Deniz A, Akman B. The physical environment factors in preschools in terms of Environmental Psychology: A Review. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 46: 2034 -2039. [In Persian]
[25] Maxwell L E. School building condition, social climate, student attendance and academic achievement: A mediation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2016; 46: 206-216.
[26] Azemati H, Aminifar Z, Pourbagher S. spatial Layout Pattern of New Schools based on the Principles of Islamic Schools, to Improving Students Learning. Naqshejahan. 2016; 6 (2): 16-23. [In Persian]
https://doi: 10.22034/aaud.2023.364524.2726.
[28] Foroud H, Rahbarimanesh K, Khansari S, Soltanzadeh H. Explaining the Principles of Environmental Designing Effectively on Student Learning in Elementary Schools:(Case Study: Rasht Elementary Schools). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2021; 23(4): 21-37. [In Persian]
[29] Rahimi R, Razani F. Assessing the Relationship between Physical Healing Components of Educational Environments and Mental Health of Users (Case Study: Students of University of Mazandaran). J. Env. Sci. Tech. 2022; 8(24): 115-132. [In Persian]
[30] Carvalho L, Freeman C G, Lamb J. Learning spaces of higher education for postdigital citizens. Postdigital Science and Education. 2024; 1-20.
[31] Kee T, Kuys B, Zhang J. The architecture for synchronous hybrid peer learning using pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework. Education and Information Technologies, 2.025; 1-31.
https://doi: 10.22061/tej.2009.1334.
https://doi: 10.30475/isau.2010.61930
CAPTCHA Image