Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran

2 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, I. R. Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Mathematics is one of the basic skills that is considered as as one of the important and fundamental subjects during education, and a significant number of students face challenges in this subject. The teaching and learning of mathematics is not only limited to transferring concepts and definitions to students, but the math program is responsible for developing and generalizing concepts, creating motivation, fostering creativity, and applying and creating connections between students' learning. However, it can be seen that the traditional methods of teaching mathematics, despite a long history, have not been able to positively affect the process of learning and teaching mathematics of students. Researchers have  sought to find a way to solve the problems of the teaching and learning process so that students can better understand the basic foundations of mathematics. With the advancement of technology and the use of computers in various branches of science, the way was paved for the use of technology in education. Among the applications of this technology, which is receiving more attention every day, is the role it can play in the learning process. With the growth and expansion of the use of computer technology in the learning process, the design of graphic learning environments has become increasingly important, and one of these graphic methods is vector graphics. Drawing can be an effective educational medium in education, because it enables the teacher to present information with different media through sound, text, animation and image. In other words, teaching with the multimedia graphic design method provides the right context to complement the teacher's efforts to attract attention, improve understanding and involve the person in learning. The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of vector graphics on the learning and engagement of students in mathematics.
Methods: The research method was an experimental with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group. The statistical population included all fifth-grade female students of the Qahavand district in the academic year of 2020-2021, which was 188. The statistical sample consisted of 30 people (15 subjects in the experimental group and 15 in the control group) who were selected from the female students of the fifth-grade primary school through an available sampling method. The experimental group was trained through Illustrator software during 8 sessions, and the control group received the usual training. The data collected by Reeve's (2013) academic engagement and learning (researcher-made) questionnaires in mathematic. Descriptive statistics indicators such as mean and standard deviation were used to analyze the data, and multivariate covariance analysis was used to check the research hypotheses.
Findings: The results showed that teaching with the help of vector graphics had a greater effect on the level of learning and engagement of students in mathematics lessons compared to teaching in the usual way. Based on the results of vector graphics training, it had a positive and significant effect on students' learning (F=9.34, P<0.01) and engagement (F=27.17, P<0.01) of students.
Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that the use of vector graphics teaching method is effective on the level of learning and academic engagement in mathematics. Considering the importance of multimedia patterns in education and the attractiveness of multimedia methods such as graphics for learners, it is suggested that teachers use vector graphics in teaching mathematics. Also, education can increase the quality of education by empowering teachers to use multimedia technologies, and considering multimedia principles in the design of textbooks, and helping students learn better.

Highlights

[1] Shabani H. Teaching and educational skills (Volume 1) Teaching methods and techniques, Tehran: Samt, 2014. [In Persian]

[2] Wang MT, Eccles JS, and Kenny S.  Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in STEM career choice. Psychological Science, (2013); 24, 770–775.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458937

[3] Asadi S, and Jamali HR. Blended Library and Multimedia Model in Geography Teaching. In the Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Education, Entertainment and e-Management (ICEEE 2011), Jakarta, Indonesia, (2011), 337- 339.

[4] Chiu TK, and Mok IA. Learner expertise and mathematics different order thinking skills in multimedia learning. Computers & Education, (2017); 107, 147-164.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.008

[5] Chiu TKF, Jong MS, and Mok IAC. Does learner expertise matter when designing emotional multimedia for learners of primary school mathematics? Education Tech Research Dev, (2020); 68, 2305–2320  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09775-4

[6] Wardat Y, Belase S, Tairab H, Takriti R, Efstratopoulou M and Dodeen H. The influence of student factors on students’ achievement in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study in Abu Dhabi Emirate Schools. Front. Psychol, (2023); 14:1168032. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168032

[7] Mukhtar R, El Islami A, Damanhuri D, and Hamundu F. Information and communication technologies to improve problem solving and self-efficacy: exploring geometry learning using dynamic mathematics software geogebra, International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, (2021); 1(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.4

[8] Guerrero S. Technological pedagogical content knowledge in the mathematics classroom. J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ, 2010; 26, 132–139.

[9] Tashtoush M, AlAli R, Wardat Y, Alshraifin N, Toubat H. The impact of information and communication technologies (ICT)-based education on the mathematics academic enthusiasm. Journal of Educational and Social Research, (2023); 13(3), 284-294.

[10] Alonso S, Aznar I, Caceres M, Torres J, Rodriguez J. Systematic Review of Good Teaching Practices with (ICT) in Spanish Higher Education. Trends and Challenges for Sustainability. (2019); 11(24), 7150. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247150

[11] Lopes RG, Ha D, Eck D, and Shlens J.  "A Learned Representation for Scalable Vector Graphics," 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Korea (South), (2019); 2, 7929-7938. https://doi:10.1109/ICCV.2019.00802

[12] Carlier A, Danelljan M, Alahi A, Timofte R. DeepSVG: A Hierarchical Generative Network for Vector Graphics Animation. 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vancouver, Canada, (2020).

[13] Li TM, Lukac M, Gharbi M, Ragan-Kelley J. Differentiable vector graphics rasterization for editing and learning. ACM Transactions on Graphics, (2020); 39(6), 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.1145/3414685.3417871

[14] Artusi A. Banterle F, Moreo A, and Carrara F. Efficient Evaluation of Image Quality via Deep-Learning Approximation of Perceptual Metrics. IEEE Trans. Image Process, (2019); 29, 1843-1855. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2019.2944079

[15] Bagheri F. Use of audio-visual materials and equipment in libraries, Tehran: Chapar, 2017. [In Persian]

[16] Hussein Biqlu K, Piri M, Yari J, Rezaei A. Designing a Multimedia Instruction based on Sweller's Cognitive Load Theory and Determining Its Effect on the Engagement and Transfer of Math Learning Among Third Grade Primary School Learners. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 2019; 6(4), 31-44. https://doi:10.30473/etl.2019.5792

[17] Mandernach BJ.  Effects of Instructor- Personalized Multimedia in the online Classroom. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2009; 10 (3), 1-19.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.606

[18] Hilton A. Engaging primary school students in mathematics: can iPads make a difference? Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2018; 16 (1), 145–165.

[19] Fredricks JA, Hofkens T, Wang M, Mortenson E, and Scott P. Supporting Girls’ and Boys’ Engagement in Math and Science Learning: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419

[20] Ingram N, Williamson-Leadley S, Pratt K. Showing and telling: using tablet technology to engage students in mathematics. Math. Educ. Res. J. 2016; 28 (1), 123–147.

https://doi: 10.1007/s13394-015-0162-y

[21] Lindahl MG, and Folkesson AM.  ICT in preschool: friend or foe? The significance of norms in a changing practice. International Journal of Early Years Education, 2012; 20(4), 422–436.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09575146.2019.1658065

https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2012.743876

[22] Lovato SB, and Waxman SR.  Young children learning from touch screens: taking a wider view. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016; 7, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01078

[23] Attard C. Mobile technologies in the primary mathematics classroom: engaging or not? In: Mathematics Education in the Digital Era. Using Mobile Technologies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, 2018; 23, 51–65.

[24] Bray A, Tangney B. Technology usage in mathematics education research – a systematic review of recent trends. Computer. Educ, 2017; 114, 255–273.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

[25] Sheehan KJ, and Uttal DH.  Children’s learning from touch screens: a dual representation perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016; 7, 1220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01220

[26] Hosseinzadeh F, Rostgarpour H, Mohammad Hasni N, Salimi S.  The effect of educational multimedia design based on the principles of cognitive load theory on learning, memorization and the motivation of academic progress in mathematics, Information and Communication Technology Quarterly in Educational Sciences, 2018; 10(2), 5-25.

[27] Mahmoudi F, Barzegar R. The effect of Dike and Kari educational design model on learning, memorization and motivation of academic progress in experimental science course. Curriculum researches, 2016; 7(1), 97-117.

http://doi:10.22099/jcr.2017.4204

[28] Anitei M, Mihaila T, Burtaverde V, and Glavan L. Motivation, positive and negative emotion at high school students. Social & Behavioral Sciences, (2015); 203, 429–432.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.319

[29] Reeve J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of educational psychology, 2013; 105(3), 579. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032690

[30] Ramazani M, Khamesan A. Psychometric characteristics of Reeve’s academic engagement questionnaire 2013: with the introduction of the Agentic Engagement. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 2017; 8(29), 185-204.

http://doi:10.22054/jem.2018.22660.1555

Keywords

Main Subjects

COPYRIGHTS 
© 2024 The Author(s).  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)  
CAPTCHA Image