فصلنامه علمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران،ایران

2 دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران،ایران

3 دانشکده فنی مهندسی، دانشگاه شیراز،ایران

چکیده

در ارائه رویکردها و مدل‌ها برای آموزش مهندسی علاوه بر دانش فنی (علم مهندسی) بر آموزش مهارت‌ها و نگرش‌ها (عمل مهندسی) نیز تأکید ویژه‌ای شده است؛ از این‌ رو، تعیین هدف‌های آموزش مهندسی با توجه به دانش، مهارت‌ها و نگرش‌های مورد نیاز مهندسان، مبنای بسیاری از مطالعات در قرن حاضر قرار گرفته است. هدف این مقاله، تعیین هدف‌های آموزش مهندسی براساس تحلیل محتوای مستندات مطرح در سطح جهانی است. جامعه مورد مطالعه تحقیق شامل مستندات در زمینه هدف‌های آموزش مهندسی بود که 8 مستند به عنوان نمونه هدفمند و موارد مطلوب برای تحلیل انتخاب شد. ابزار گردآوری داده‌های پژوهش فیش، چک لیست و فرم‌های محقق ساخته بوده است و برای تحلیل و تفسیر داده‌ها از روش کدگذاری باز و کدگذاری محوری استفاده شده است. براساس تحلیل محتوای انجام شده، 24 هدف برای آموزش مهندسی تعیین گردید که در 5 طبقه دسته‌بندی شدند. در ادامه، مشخص شد که هدف‌های تعیین شده با چه گزاره‌هایی توسط مستندات موجود حمایت می‌شوند و سرانجام براساس پژوهش‌های انجام شده در این زمینه مشخص گردید که هدف‌های مورد نظر به نحو مطلوبی با مستندات موجود ارتباط دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Objectives of Engineering Education

نویسندگان [English]

  • H. Motahhari Nejad 1
  • N.G. Ghourchian 2
  • P. Jafari 2
  • M. Yaghoubi 3

1 Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz

چکیده [English]

In developing the models and approaches for engineering education, in addition to having technical knowledge (engineering science) there is a specific focus on skills and attitudes (engineering practice). Hence, the determination of engineering education objectives with regard to the required knowledge, skills, and attitudes for engineers is the basis of many studies in the present century. The aim of this paper is to determine the objectives of engineering education based on content analysis of present documents. The society in this research includes present documents in the context of engineering education objectives in which seven documents as purposeful samples and desirable cases were selected for analysis. The instruments for data collection were a checklist and researcher-made forms. The data was analyzed and interpreted by open coding and axial coding. Based on the performed content analysis, 24 objectives were determined for engineering education, which were classified into five categories. Then it was determined how the established objectives were supported by present documents. At last, based on the performed research in the field, the relation between assumed objectives with present documents was determined. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Engineering Education
  • Educational Objectives
  • Technical knowledge
  • Skills and Attitudes
[1] Engineering Education Research Colloquies., Special report: the research agenda for the new discipline of engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.95, No.4, 2006, pp.259-261. [2] National Academy of Engineering., Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, USA: National Academy of Sciences, 2005. [3] Grimson J., Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.27, No.1, 2002, pp.31-37. [4] Dym C. L., Agogino A.M., Eris O., Frey D.D. and Leifer L.J., Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning, Journal of Engineering Education, January, 2005, pp.103-120. [5] Bankel J. and et al., Benchmarking engineering curricula with the CDIO syllabus, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.21, No.1, 2005, pp.121-133. [6] Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Ostlund S. and Brodeur D., Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, New York, 2007. [7] Faiz M., Study of Required Professional Competencies of Engineering Graduate in Iran (Case study: Graduates of SHARIF University of Technology), Ph.D. Thesis, School of Psychology and Educational Science, Shahid Beheshti University, 2010. [8] Bahadori-Nejad M., Engineering Ethics and Ethics Engineering, Tehran, Yazda, 2008. [9] Memarian H., Internal assessment of Iran’s engineering education programs, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.11, No.42, 2009, pp.1-18. [10] Pascail L., The emergence of the skills approach in industry and its consequences for the training of engineers, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.31, No.1, 2006, pp.55-61. [11] Spinks N., Silburn N.L.J. and Birchall D.W., Making it all work: the engineering graduate of the future, a UK perspective, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.32, No.3, 2007, pp.325-335. [12] Sevindik T. and Akpinar B., The effects of the changes in postmodern pedagogical paradigms on engineering education in Turkey, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.32, No.5, 2007, pp.561-571. [13] Haghi A.K., New visions in engineering education: breaking from conventional models creative approaches, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.7, No.28, 2006, pp.1-12. [14] Bahadori-Nejad M. and Namaki A., Parallel engineering education at universities and industries, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.10, No.39, 2008, pp.63-74. حسین مطهری نژاد و همکاران 171 نشریه علمی پژوهشی فناوری آموزش، سال ششم، جلد 6 ،شماره 3 ،تابستان 3313 [15] Rahimi G.H., Engineering education and future developments of the country, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.1, No.3, 1999, pp.1-11. [16] Motahhari-Nejad H., Yaghoubi M. and Davami P., Requirements of engineering education for meeting the needs of industry in Iran, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.13, No.52, 2012, pp.23-39. [17] Yaghoubi M. and Motahhari-Nejad H., Requirements for codifying strategies of engineering education in Iran, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.13, No.51, 2011, pp.31-51. [18] Hsieh H. and Shannon S.E., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, Vol.15, 2005, pp.1277-1288. [19] Mayring P., Qualitative content analysis, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol.1, No.2, 2000. [20] Zhang Y. and Wildemuth B.M., Qualitative analysis of content, in: Wildemuth B., (Ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, 2009, pp.308-319. [21] Woollacott L.C., Validating the CDIO syllabus for engineering education using the taxonomy of engineering competencies, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.34, No.6, 2009, pp.545-559. [22] Woollacott L.C., Dealing with underpreparedness in engineering education, part 1: defining the goal- taxonomy of engineering competency, Proceedings of the 2003 WFEO/ASEE e-Conference, Available at: http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstream/handle/105 39/5027/LC%20Woollacott.pdf?sequence=1, 2010. [23] UK Engineering Council., UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence, Engineering Technician, Incorporated Engineer and Chartered Engineer Standard, Engineering Council, 2010. [24] Brumm T.J., Hanneman L.F. and Mickelson S.K., Assessing and developing program through workplace competencies, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.22, No.1, 2006, pp.123-129. [25] Iowa State University., Engineering and technology workplace competencies, Available at: http:// learn.ae. iastate.edu/ competencydefinitions. pdf., 2010. [26] Augusti G., Accreditation of Engineering Programmes: European Perspectives and Challenges in a Global Context, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.32, No.3, 2007, pp.273-283. [27] European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education., EUR-ACE Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes, 2008. [28] International Engineering Alliance., Graduate attributes and professional competencies, Available at: http://www. washingtonaccord.org /IEA-Grad-Attr-Prof-Competencies-v2.pdf, 2009, [29] Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology, Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: effective for evaluations during the 2010-2011 accreditation cycle, Available at: http:// www. abet. org/ uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation_Pro cess/Accreditation_Documents/Archive/criteria -eac-2010-2011.pdf, 2009, [30] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004. [31] Patil A. and Codner G., Accreditation of engineering education: review, observations and proposal for global accreditation, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.32, No.6, 2007, pp.639-651. [32] Trevelyan J., Engineering education requires a better model of engineering practice, Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Palm Cove, QLD, Available at: http://rees2009.pbworks.com/ f/rees2009_submission_52.pdf, 2009. [33] Malmqvist J., A Comparison of the CDIO and EUR-ACE Quality Assurance Systems, Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore Polytechnic, Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/ document/file/CDIO-Eur-Ace-Paper-final. pdf, 2009, [34] Crawley E.F., Creating the CDIO syllabus, a universal template for engineering education, 32nd ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Available at: http://www.cdio. org/knowledge- library /documents/ creatingcdio-syllabus-universal-template-engineeringeducation, Boston, 2002. [35] Brumm T.J., Hanneman L.F. and Mickelson S. K., The Data Are In: Student Workplace Competencies in the Experiential Workplace, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Available at: http://soa.asee.org/ paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=21310, 2005. [36] Freeston I., Progressing towards Global Standards in Engineering Education, Presented at the ENAEE Workshop, Brussels, Available at: http://www.enaee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/ 01/Brussels-09-Freeston_ GAss220109_ v21.pdf, 2009, pp.1-9.

نامه به سردبیر

سر دبیر نشریه فناوری آموزش، با تواضع انتشار نامه های واصله از نویسندگان و خوانندگان و بحث در سامانه نشریه را ظرف 3 ماه از تاریخ انتشار آنلاین مقاله در سامانه و یا قبل از انتشار چاپی نشریه، به منظور اصلاح و نظردهی امکان پذیر نموده است.، البته این شامل نقد در مورد تحقیقات اصلی مقاله نمی باشد.

توچه به موارد ذیل پیش از ارسال نامه به سردبیر لازم است در نظر گرفته شود:


[1]نامه هایی که شامل گزارش از آمار، واقعیت ها، تحقیقات یا نظریه ها هستند، لازم است همراه با منابع معتبر و مناسب باشند، اگرچه ارسال بیش از زمان 3 نامه توصیه نمی گردد

[2] نامه هایی که بجای انتقاد سازنده به ایده های تحقیق، مشتمل بر حملات شخصی به نویسنده باشند، توجه و چاپ نمی شود

[3] نامه ها نباید بیش از 300 کلمه باشد

[4] نویسندگان نامه لازم است در ابتدای نامه تمایل یا عدم تمایل خود را نسبت به چاپ نظریه ارسالی نسبت به یک مقاله خاص اعلام نمایند

[5] به نامه های ناشناس ترتیب اثر داده نمی شود

[6] شهر، کشور و محل سکونت نویسندگان نامه باید در نامه مشخص باشد.

[7] به منظور شفافیت بیشتر و محدودیت حجم نامه، ویرایش بر روی آن انجام می پذیرد.

CAPTCHA Image