Evaluating the effect of different learning styles on the performance of architecture students in virtual training

Hamidian Divkolaei, L.S.; Bagheri, S. M.

doi:10.22061/tej.2023.9440.2847

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Architecture and Urban planning, Babol girls' Technical and Vocational college, Technical and Vocational university (TVU), Tehran, Iran

² Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Arts, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2023.9440.2847

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Today, turning to virtual education in schools and universities along with face-to-face training is inevitable. Virtual education has received much attention in recent years in Iran. This becomes even more important and valuable when it comes to teaching practical courses. Architecture, as a field in which many of its courses are considered practical, would encounter serious challenges in students' learning if the important points in virtual education are not considered. One of the issues that may be overlooked in the field of virtual education is the discussion of learning differences among students. Learning style is a characteristic that determines how students learn and how they prefer to learn, and the teacher also learns to identify and guide the needs of individual students. Failure to pay attention to the differences in students’ learning styles, especially in virtual education, where the teacher does not have much visual and face-to-face communication with students, will sometimes lead to a complete lack of transfer of concepts in education. Traditional classroom-based learning, on the other hand, typically leads to a consistent learning process that does not fit the learners’ different needs, while in targeted web-based learning programs, learning can be implemented properly. The cognition of the differences in learning process among students is one of the important factors in developing and improving education. Examining the different styles of students in learning, can be helpful to improve the quality of education and transfer better learning to students, especially in virtual education.
Methods: In this article, we try to know the four divisions of students' learning style, and their performance in different courses of architecture. The present study was conducted on 48 architectural students in their first semester (who has started their studies with virtual education) from different degrees) bachelor and associate degree) in architecture and interior design. Architecture students face different attitudes in various academic years. Because of the impact that cognitive changes have on students' learning styles, it was decided to consider the statistical population among the freshmen in order to reduce the impact of changes in students’ learning styles, so that students' initial learning style is identified. SPSS 23 software was used to analyze the data.
Findings: The results showed that the majority of architecture students in the bachelor and associate degree, from the selected community, used the adaptive learning style and the students of the interior design group had convergent learning styles. Studies also showed no significant relationship between degree and students' field of study with their performance. Also, the results of studies demonstrated that students with divergent learning style in the theoretical courses of bachelor’s degree in architecture field, had the best performance (with an average of 20), whereas students with convergent learning style in theoretical-practical courses of bachelor’s degree in architecture earned the lowest performance (with an average of 8.25). According to the results of the studies, it seemed that only in the bachelor’s degree students and in the theoretical-practical course (architectural design 2), there was a significant relationship (sig <0.05).
Conclusion: It is suggested that educators be aware of different learning styles at the beginning of each training course in order to consider a specific category for each group of people with a common learning style. By identifying their learning style, learners can use the flexible structure that e-learning allows to achieve the desired learning outcome.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1402.17.3.3.6

Main Subjects

Electronic learning- virtual

COPYRIGHTS
©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Mobsser Azad, A M, Akhlaghinia A. Evaluation of the quality of the education management system of the Technical and Vocational University of Iran during the Covid-19 epidemic (Case Study of Shamsipour University, Tehran). Karafan quarterly research, journal of technical and vocational university., 2021; 17(5): 157-176.

[2] Tseng J C R, Chu H C, Hwang G J, Tsai C C. Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Computer and Education. 2008; 51(2): 776 – 786.

[3] Ling-Hsiu, C. Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles. Computers & Education. 2010; 54(4): 1028-1035.

[4] Hojjat E. Architecture homework: Tehran Knowledge Publication; 2012.

[5] Hosseini E S, Falamaki M M, Hojjat E. The role of creative thinking and learning styles in teaching architectural design. Two Quarterly Journal of Architectural Thought. 2019; 5: 125 – 140.

[6] Zangoei S. Investigating the effect of students' satisfaction factors on online education in two types of theory and workshop courses in technical and vocational. Karafan quarterly research, journal of technical and vocational university. (2021); 17(5): 233-246.

[7] Sobhi Gharamaleki N, Hajlou N, Gholamzadeh H. Comparison of learning styles, personality traits and academic performance Students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities. 2013; 2(4): 82 – 102. URL:

[8] Alkhuraiji S M. Dynamic adaptive E-learning mechanism based on learning styles. [dissertation].The university of Manchester;2016.

[9] Truong H M. Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Journal of computers in human behavior. 2013; 55: 1185-1193.

[10] Rashidi-jahan H, Saffari M, Sanaeinasab H, Pakpour A, Khajehazad M. Learning styles of students of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences. Jmed. 2013; 8 (1) :52-64.

[11] Khandaghi M A, Rajaei M. The effect of students' learning style on their preferred learning style. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013; 28: 15 – 37.

[12] Kalbasi S, Naseri M, Sharifzadeh G, Poursafar A. Medical Students’ Learning Styles in Birjand University of medical sciences. SDME. 2008; 5 (1): 10-16.

[13] Demirbas O O, Demirkan H. Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and instruction. (2007); 17(3): 345-359.

[14] Demirkan H, Demirbaş Ö O. The effects of learning styles and gender on the academic performance of interior architecture students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. (2010); 2(2): 1390-1394.

[15] Labib W, Pasina I, Abdelhadi A, Bayram G, Nurunnabi M. Learning style preferences of architecture and interior design students in Saudi Arabia: A survey. MethodsX. (2019); 961-967.

[16] Feyzi M, Dejpasand S. Analysis of students' learning styles to promote architecture education, Journal of Iranian Architectural Studies. (2018); 7 (14) :149-169.

[17] Mirmoradi S S. Study of architecture students’ learning styles. Hoviat-shahr. (2018); 12(3): 49-64.

[18] Matthew H, Olson B R. An introduction to theories of learning, 8^th ed. (2012).

[19] Babaei M. Introduction to e-learning. Iran Institute of Information Science and Technology. 2010.

[20] Coutinho S A, Neuman G. A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environment Research. 2008;11:131-151.

[21] Young L E, Paterson B L. Teaching nursing developing: a student-centered learning environment. Lipincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

[22] Seif A K. Ravanshenasi-e Parvareshi-e Novin [Modern educational psychology]. Tehran: doran; 2016.

[23] Kolb A Y. The Kolb learning style inventory-version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resource Direct. 2005; 200(72): 166-171.

[24] Mahdavipour H, Jafari A. The place of indigenous knowledge and industry in today's architecture education. Journal Housing and rural environment. 2011; 137: 17 – 36.

[25] Hojat E. Architecture training and the worthlessness of values. Journal of honar-ha-ye-ziba. 2002; 14(14).

[26] Hojat E. Evolution of the architectural education in Iran, from chest-to-chest education to shoulder-to-shoulder education. Journal of Iranian Engineering Education. 2013; 14(56): 37-53.

[27] Sedaghati A, Hojjat E. The Instructional Content of the Architecture Education in Iran and the Success Rate of the Bachelors’ Degree Course in the Transfer of this Content. JIAS. 2019; 8 (15): 91-112.

[28] Hamid Nadimi. How designers think: the design process demystified. Lawson B (Author). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press; (2007).

[29] Arkorful V, Abaidoo N. The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2015; 12(1): 29-42.

[30] Narenjithani F, Pourkarimi j, Hejazi S. Identifying the components of e-learning system at university of Tehran. Technology of education journal (TEJ). 2021; 15(2): 321 – 327.

[31] Pourtavakoli A, Alinejad M, Daneshmand B. Designing a pattern for e-content development based on the factors affecting satisfaction in e-learning. Technology of education journal (TEJ). 2021; 15(1): 119 – 138.

[32] Atashak M. Theoretical and Applied Principles of Electronic Learning, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2007; 13(1): 135 – 156.

[33] Garavand, A. Evaluating the effectiveness of e-Learning at Tehran university [master’s thesis]. Tehran: University of Tehran; 2019.

[34] Khandaghi M A, Rajaei M. The effect of students' learning style on their preferred learning style. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013; 28: 15 – 37.