Identifying and modeling the successful educational experiences of elementary school teachers in the e-learning environment during the Corona era

Tari, F.; Javadipour, M.; Hakimzadeh, R.; Dehghani, M.

doi:10.22061/tej.2022.8903.2750

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Methods and Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2022.8903.2750

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Following the outbreak of covid19, e-learning has provided a unique opportunity to face the limitations of face-to-face education and achieve the ideal of education for all. Since teachers are considered as the most important influential factor in the teaching-learning process, the analysis of their successful and unsuccessful educational experiences can give us a deeper understanding of the current situation and provide solutions to achieve the desired situation and strengthen it. Given the vast amount of research conducted on the challenges and problems of teachers in the electronic context, the present study aims to focus specifically on the strengths of teachers' teaching experiences in the new learning environment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is identifying and modeling the importance of successful educational experiences of elementary school teachers in the e-learning environment.
Methods: This is a qualitative and phenomenological study. Participants in this study include all elementary school teachers who had the experience of teaching in electronic context (Shad Program) in the academic year 2020-2021. Eighteen teachers among them were selected through purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews were used to collect information until the researcher could achieve theoretical saturation. The findings were analyzed, using Colaizzi's seven-step strategy. In-depth analysis of the interviews resulted in the identification of 7 main categories and 25 related sub-categories. In the next step, the identified key categories entered into the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) software. In this section, first the structure of the communications between the categories was drawn in the form of an interactive network and then the importance of each of them was determined.
Findings: The research findings showed that successful educational experiences of elementary school teachers in the e-learning environment in the order of their importance include the development of technological competencies (61 points), progress and modernization of curriculum elements (60 points), paying attention to emotional-psychological needs (53 points), promotion of social skills (51 points), development of scientific education (28 points), paying attention to aspects of biological and physical education (21 points) and strengthening aesthetic capacities (17 points).
Conclusion: The results of the present study can be considered as a continuum in which, on the one hand, the development of technological competencies is of the highest importance and, on the other hand, the strengthening of aesthetic capacities is of the least importance. Based on the results obtained, a major overhaul of pre-service and in-service teacher training methods is needed to keep pace with the developments in technology-rich environments. In order to improve the quality of the teaching and learning process in the electronic context, teachers should also pay attention to the specific requirements of this new educational environment and its developmental capacities, and instead of using traditional teaching methods, prioritize their focus on educating students in all areas, encouraging group collaboration and participation in the virtual classroom, fostering students' curiosity and flourishing their individual creativity, strengthening students’ motivation students and paying attention to students’ individual abilities, interests, talents and personal differences of students in the new ecosystem so that they teachers could hope for an effective and active presence of students in their virtual classes.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1401.17.1.5.0

Main Subjects

Technology-based learning environments

COPYRIGHTS
©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Drexler W. The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian journal of educational technology. 2010; 26(3).

[2] Arkhi H. Factors Affecting e-Learning Admission from the Perspective of Secondary High School Students Based on Davis Technology Admission Model [master’s thesis]. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Babolsar: Mazandaran University; 2018. Persian.

[3] Webster J. Curriculum change and ‘crisis’. British Journal of Educational Studies. 1976; 24(3): 18-203.

[4] Shabanivaraki B, Hooshmand A. [Autopoietic Curriculum in the Age of Outbreak of Pandemic Covid-19 and Corona-Life]. Two Quarterly Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2020; 5(2): 7-27. Persian.

[5] Gharari M, Mohammadi R, Ghorbani M. [Investigating the Damages and Challenges of Coronavirus Pandemic on Education]. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology. 2021; 16: 29-37. Persian.

[6] Alborzi M, Mohammadi R, Naseri Jahromi R, Safari M, Mirghafari F. [Elementary School Teachers' Experiences of the Challenges of Changing Traditional Education to Virtual Education during the Corona Virus Outbreak]. Studies in Learning & Instruction. 2021; 13(1): 1-19. Persian.

[7] Mosayebi M, Rezapour Mirsaleh Y, Behjati F. [The problems and challenges of virtual education in elementary school during the outbreak of coronavirus]. Quarterly Journal of Education Studies. 2021; 27(7): 65-79. Persian.

[8] Sari FM, Oktaviani L. Undergraduate Students’ Views on the Use of Online Learning Platform during COVID-19 Pandemic. Teknosastik. 2021; 19(1): 7-41.

[9] Hajizadeh A, Azizi Gh, Keyhan G. [Analyzing the opportunities and challenges of e-learning in the Corona era: An approach to the development of e-learning in the post-Corona]. Teaching Reaserch. 2021; 9(1): 174-204. Persian.

[10] Barbour M, Brown R, Waters LH, Hoey R, Hunt JL, Kennedy K, et al. Online and Blended Learning: A Survey of Policy and Practice from K-12 Schools around the World. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. 2011: 1-130.

[11] Dhawan S. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of educational technology systems. 2020; 49(1): 5-22.

[12] Ogbonna CG, Ibezim NE, Obi CA. Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education. 2019; 39(2): 1-15.

[13] Zamani B E, Madani S A. [Guidelines for increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of teachers in virtual education]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2011; 2(3): 39-50. Persian.

[14] Ely DP. Trends in Educational Technology. Clearing house on Information Resources. 1992: 1-64.

[15] Saban A. Okul teknolojisi planlamasi ve koordinasyonu. Ankara: Pegem A Yayincilik; 2007.

[16] Bower M, Vlachopoulos P. A critical analysis of technology‐enhanced learning design frameworks. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2018; 49(6): 97-981.

[17] Tyminski AM, Haltiwanger L, Zambak VS, Horton R, Hedetniemi T. Developing inquiry practices in middle grades mathematics teachers: Examining the introduction of technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 2013; 13(4): 59-325.

[18] Sykes D. Online education during a pandemic: Teaching and learning in home spaces. Literacies & language education: research & practice: Teaching during a pandemic. 2020; 1(1): 86-88.

[19] Woltran F, Chan R, Lindner K, Schwab S. Austrian Elementary School Teachers’ Perception of Professional Challenges During Emergency Distance Teaching due to COVID-19. Front Educ. 2021; 759541.

[20] Moradi A, Zarghami hamrah S. [Barriers and strategies of using student social network (SHĀD) in the teaching and learning of students during the corona outbreak: A phenomenological study]. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations. 2021; 20(2): 35-60. Persian.

[21] Atakan I. Pre-service science teachers’ TPACK efficacy levels and technology integration quality: application of TPACK-IDDIRR model [master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University; 2019.

[22] Barari N, Moeini A, Rezaei zadeh M, Abbai kasani H. [Future teacher; change in roles and tasks in the digital environments based on the Connectivism theory]. Technolog of Education journal. 2017; 11(2): 70-161. Persian.

[23] Mandasari B, Wahyudin AY. Flipped Classroom Learning Model: Implementation and Its Impact on EFL Learners’ Satisfaction on Grammar Class. Ethical Lingua. Journal of Language Teaching and Literature. 2021; 8(1): 8-150.

[24] Yunitasari R, Hanifah U. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa pada Masa COVID 19. Edukatif Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2020; 2(3): 43-232.

[25] Pryor J, Wilson RH, Chapman M, Bates F. Elementary Educators' Experiences Teaching during COVID-19 School Closures: Understanding Resources in Impromptu Distance Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2020; 23(4): 4.

[26] Fauzi I, Khusuma IHS. Teachers’ elementary school in online learning of COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan. 2020; 5(1): 58-70.

[27] Mirkholikovna DK. Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. Наука и образование сегодня. 2020; 7 (54): 2-70.

[28] Centeio E, Mercier K, Garn A, Erwin H, Marttinen R, Foley J. The Success and Struggles of Physical Education Teachers While Teaching Online During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2021; 40(4): 667–673.

[29] Abbasi F, Hejazi E, Hakimzade R. [Lived experience of elementary school teachers about the opportunities and challenges of teaching in the educational network of students (SHAD): A phenomenological study]. Research in Teaching. 2020; 8(3): 1-24. Persian.

[30] Lestari PAS, Gunawan G. The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on learning implementation of primary and secondary school levels. Indonesian Journal of Elementary and Childhood Education. 2020; 1(2): 58-63.

[31] Firuzjaeyan A, Firuzjaeyan M, Hashemi Petroodi S, Gholamrezazadeh F. [Applying Techniques of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) in Tourism Studies (A Pathological Approach)]. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development. 2013; 2(6): 129-159. Persian.

[32] Mirghafouri S H, karimi gogheri Z, Shabani A. [Improvement of Public Library Services Quality: A Strategic Plan by Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC (Case Study: Yazd City Public Libraries in Iran)]. Research on Information Science & Public Libraries. 2017; 22(4): 583-601. Persian.

[33] Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice. 2000; 39(3): 30-124.

[34] Mehrmohammadi M. Curriculum: Theories, Approaches and Perspectives. Mashhad: Astan Qods Razavi; 2011. Persian.

[35] Rezaei zadeh M, Ansari M, Morfi E. A Practical Guide to Interactive Management Research Methods (IM) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). Tehran: Jahad daneshgahi; 2013. Persian.

[36] Ahmadi R, Zareizavaraki E, Noruzi D, Delavar A, Dortaj F. [Studying the status of existing student-teacher qualifications in accordance with UNESCO standards]. Journal of Research in Educational Science. 2016; 10(32): 1-22. Persian.

[37] Lubis AH, Dasopang MD. Online learning during the covid-19 pandemic: How is it implemented in elementary schools. Premiere Educandum.: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran. 2021; 11(1): 34-120.

[38] Perifanou M, Economides A, Tzafilkou K. Teachers’ Digital Skills Readiness During COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2021; 16(8): 238-251.

[39] Almerich G, Orellana N, Suárez-Rodríguez J, Díaz-García I. Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education. 2016; 100: 25-110.

[40] Norouzzadeh R, Kossary M. [Description of the Characteristics of the Quadruplet Elements Undergraduate Curriculum with Emphasis on Training Entrepreneurship Skills]. IRPHE. 2010; 15(4): 1-18. Persian.

[41] Subaih RHA, Sabbah SS, Al-Duais RNE. Obstacles Facing Teachers in Palestine While Implementing E-learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Social Science. 2021; 17(4): 1-12.

[42] Amozad E, Tohidipoor A. The role of teachers and parents in meeting the emotional needs of students. The Second International Conference on New Findings in Science and Technology: 2017 July 17: Qom, Iran. Persian.

[43] Garma Roudi Gh R, Vahdani Nia MS. [Social health: An investigation into social skills among students]. Payesh. 2006; 5(2):147-153. Persian.

[44] Abolmaali Alhosseini, K. [Psychological and Instructional consequences of Corona disease (Covid-19) and coping strategies with them]. Educational Psychology. 2020; 16(55): 157-193. Persian.

[45] Ferri F, Grifoni P, Guzzo T. Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies. 2020; 10(4): 86.

[46] Hamad F. Palestinian Mothers’ Perceptions about Online Learning at Public and Private Elementary Schools during COVID-19: Challenges and Recommendations. Pedagogical Research. 2021; 6(3): 1-18.

[47] Martins CB, Steil AV, Todesco JL. Factors influencing the adoption of the Internet as a teaching tool at foreign language schools. Computers & Education. 2004; 42(4): 74-353.