Investigating the current situation of higher agricultural education in khuzestan province from the perspective of metacognitive approach

Baradaran, M.; Taghibaygi, M.; Alibaygi, A.H.

doi:10.22061/tej.2020.6285.2373

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Agriculture Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture Engineering and Rural Civil Engineering, Agriculture Sciences & Natural Resources University of Khuzestan,Molasani,Iran

² Department of Agriculture Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2020.6285.2373

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Metacognition as an individual's knowledge about how to learn in agricultural higher education centers should be taken into consideration because the familiarity with metacognitive topics and its role in the process of teaching learning in agricultural higher education centers is an attempt on the part of the educators to take an effective step so that they can play an influential role in the effectiveness of the country's agricultural higher education system. The education that is based on metacognition leads to lifelong learning in the learners in a way that cultivating such a trait in agricultural students leads to curiosity, responsibility, and the flourishing of creativity in them. In fact, by using the right methods of learning and studying (metacognition), agricultural learners and students can learn the material that is related to their field of study better and more easily.
Methods: The present applied research was a kind of descriptive survey method. The statistical population of the study were the faculty members of Agriculture at Shahid Chamran University (N = 82) and the faculty members of Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (N = 85) from which all the information was collected. The research tool was a researcher-made questionnaire that in the first stage of its design, due to consultation with the research team and based on the theoretical foundations, the most important components of higher education and agriculture were identified. After determining these components, the criteria for each componentwere identified based on the theoretical foundations. The markers were identified during three Delphi stages through conducting interviews with 15 metacognitive experts. The method of selecting experts was in the form of snowballs. In the first stage, based on a review of the theoretical foundations and the viewpoints of the experts (in the form of open-ended questions and interviews), the indicators were identified for the main components related to metacognition. In the second stage of Delphi, a new questionnaire was prepared based on the Likert scale of five sections. After collecting the second stage questionnaires and analyzing the answers, the items with an average of 3.33 and above that were confirmed. The approved items were used to design the third stage questionnaire and to indicate the agreement or the disagreement of the experts. Having done the date analysis, those indicators with which 66% and above were finally approved.
Findings: The results showed that the agricultural higher education system of Khuzestan province is in an unsuitable level in terms of all components of metacognition except educational planning and educational environment.
Examination of the current situation of agricultural higher education based on the identified indicators showed that in the components of the curiculum, education management and inservice training courses, planning, evaluation, educational environment and teaching based on the amount of one-sample t-test, there is a significant difference between the real value and the assumed value. The course has two criteria of participation and justification that the value of the t-test showed that there is a significant difference between the two real and assumed values. The component of education management and in-service training courses has two criteria of empowerment and justification and the t- test shows a significant difference between the real and the assumed value. The evaluation component has two criteria of participation and performance that the value of the t-test showed that there is a significant difference between the two real and assumed values. The component of the educational environment also has two criteria of motivation, facilitation- interaction in a way that the value of the t-test in all these three criteria shows a significant difference between the amounts of the two real and assumed values. The teaching component has three criteria, namely before teaching, during teaching, and after teaching. The value of the t-test shows a significant difference between the two real and the assumed values. The results of the F-test show that there is a significant difference between at the level of 0.001 between the academic rank of the respondents at the level of 0.005 and between the field of study of the faculty members in terms of performing the tasks that are related to metacognition.
Conclusion. In the components of the curriculum, education management and inservice training courses, educational evaluation, instructor or teaching duties, educational planning and learning environment, the current situation is not at an appropriate level. This means that the various indicators of metacognition are not properly observed in these components. Given the importance of these components in agricultural higher education in order to achieve its macro goals and vision, the system should be reviewed and revised based on the indicators that are of significance and priority. It is necessary for the policymakers and planners of agricultural higher education to consider the indicators related to the main components of the system which have been identified in this research in planning and designing the educational programs. The Policymakers and planners are advised to change the educational system in a way that the dominant atmosphere in the classrooms would be participatory and cooperative and the content of the books be adjusted in such a way that critical thinking as a strategy of deep learning can be facilitated.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1399.14.4.14.8

Main Subjects

Modern Educational Approaches

COPYRIGHTS
©2020 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1][ Movahedi R, Gol F, Yousefi Mohammadi M. [Development of agricultural higher education with emphasis on sustainable entrepreneurship]. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture.2016;3(1):55-77. Persian.

[2] Varmaziyari H,Ghaniyan M,Baradaran M.]Students' Viewpoints on the status of agricultural higher education system in Iran, challenges and solutions [.Journal of Agricultural Knowledge,.2009;2 (1): 39-52. Persian.

[3] SheykhAlizadeh S, Ahmadi E, Higher Education, University and National Development. Proceedings, institute education research and planning, Iranian higher education association; 2004. Tehran. Persian.

[4] Loozano R, Motivation in education: Theory, Reasearch and Application. New jersey, Johnston; 2010.

[5] Anderson N. The role of metacognition in second Language Teaching and Learning. Brigham Young University; Eric Digest Byrnes; 2002.

[6] Fekri Sh, Yaghoubi J, Popzan, AH. Analysis of the preferences of Iranian scientific, agricultural, veterinary and natural resources members in the use of teaching methods and styles and teaching aids [master’s thesis]. Campus ofd Agriculture and Natural Resources: Razi University of Kermanshah; 2011. Persian.

[7] Mohammadi M, Marzooghi R A, Torkzade J, Salimi G H, Hadadniya S. ]Excellent training program based on a lifelong learning approach[.Bi-quarterly journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies. 2015; 7(13): 37-77. Persian.

[8] Shakhe R. Training features and methods of teaching lifelong learning. Paper presented in the 8^th national Conference of the Association.

[9] Eslami I, Abbasi Et, Bijani M. ]Developing Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Agricultural higher education system[. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences. 2016: 12(2):183-196. Persion.

[10] Mansouri R. [University and its definition]. Rahyat Quarterly.2001; (24): 16-29: Persian.

[11] Rostami F, Aliabadi V. [The impact of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies on predicting the academic achievement motivation of agricultural students]. Journal pf managment research and agricultural education.2014:6(30); 67-76. Persian.

[12 Sadeghi Z, Mohtashami R. ]The role of metacognition in learning process[. Journal of Education Strategies.2010; 3(5): 143-148.Persian.

[13] Moghadasi Farimani S H, Zamani G H. ]Elective training approach for agricultural education course [. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences.2017; 3(1):11-25.Persian.

[14] Hajihashemi Z, Movahedi R. ]Pathology of agricultural education in Payame Noor University of Shahreza[. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 2017; 2(1): 929-941. Persian.

[15] Zare H, Mohammadzadeh R. [Predicting metacognitive awareness and its components based on goals of progress[, Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning. 2013;1 (1): 1-14. Persian.

[16] Joseph N.[Metacognition needed: teaching middle and high school students to develop strategic learning skills]. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2010; 54 (2): 99-103.

[17] Taghibaygi M, Baradaran M. Alibaygi A H. ]Explaining Sscenario, strategies and policies of meta-cognition institutionalization in agricultural higher education[.Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences. 2020; 16 (2): 25-47. Persian.

[18] Sadeghi Z, Mohtashami R. ]The role of metacognition in learning process[. Journal of Education Strategies, 2010; 3(5): 143-148. Persian.

[19] Attar Khamenei F, Seif A A. The Impact of Study Learning Strategies on Motivation and Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2009; 9: 57-74.

[20] Amini M, Rahimi H, Samadiyan Z,Gholami alavi S. ]Evaluation of student's metacognitive skills in Islamic education courses. Reflection on the function of the higher education system[. Research in Education Issues.2015; 21 (21): 103-120. Persian.

[21] Gordan Shakane M, Yarmohammadian M H . ]The effect of metacognitive teaching on self-directed learning in medical record students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences[. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2010; (2) 10: 131-140 Persian.

[22] Shannon H. The Effectiveness of a REBT Training Program in Increasing in Mathematics. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 2008; 16 (3): 197-2009.

[23] Carson l. An exploration of metacognition and its interplay with other forms of conscious thought processing in independent learning at tertiary level [doctoral dissertation].Dublin City Unviersity; 2012.

[24] Mostafaei A, Mahboobi, T. Thinking and metacognition of its concepts, theories and its application. Tehran: Press Porsesh; 2006. Persian.

[25] Salehi J, Karimi Y, Seif AA, Delaware A. [Predicting metacognitive awareness and its components based on goals of progress]. Journal of Psychology.2002; 2(8) 30:144-157. Persian.

[26] Karami A, Delaware A, Bahrami H, Ukrimi Y. Developing a tool for measuring learning and study strategies and determining the relationship between these strategies and academic achievement.[doctoral dissertation]. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba'i University; 2002. Persian.

[27] Yousefi Z. Comparison of study and learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful students in the field of humanities and basic sciences in Tehran universities.[master’s thesis]. Educational Psychology, Universities Allameh Tabatabai; 2001. Persian.

[28] Mirzaei F. [Investigating the Rrelationship between Mmetacognitive knowledge components and reading comprehension with transformational perspective in elementary and third grade elementary school students in district 7 of Tehran]. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2002; 6: 42-57.Persian.

[29] Alexander J M, Carr M, Schwanenflugel P J. Development of metacognitio in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review. 2000; 15: 1-37.

[30] Saif A. Learning and Reading Methods. Second Edition. Tehran. Dena Publishing; 2009: .1-112.

[31] Moradgholi M. ]Investigating the relationship between the application of metacognitive strategy and the performance of Zahedan high school students in mathematical problem solving[. Journal of Training Strategies. 2010; 3 (4): 37-54. Persian.

[32] Chalmeh R, Latifian M. Characteristics of metacognitive learning environment and academic achievement, assessing the mediating role of motivational beliefs in students. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012; 6 (3) 23: 43-58.

[33] Phillips k, Diaz S. Gender differences in body dysmorphic disorder in a german college student sample. Journal of psychiatrres. 2001; 109: 4-101.

[34] Schraw T G, Dennison R S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Pyschology. 2005; 19:460-475.

[35] Taghibaygi M, Baradaran M, Alibaygi A H. ]The status of metacognitive components among agricultural students in Khuzestan[. Journal of agricultural education administration.2020; 2 (44): 74-95. Persian.

[36] Shabani H. Textbooks and Teaching Techniques. Tehran: Samt Publications; 2019. Persian.

[37] Helms D J,Nixson J. Not all metacognition is created equal. New Directons for Teaching and Learning.2003; (95(: 73-79.

[38] Baradaran M, Movahed Mohamadi H, Shabanali Fami H, Mehralizade Y. Identifying student's viewpoints on the Key elements of the quality of teaching evaluation mechanism. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2010; 1: 121-135.