Document Type : Original Research Paper


Department of Electrical Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology,Tehran,Iran


This paper identifies issues that arise from traditional university feedback systems. Traditional university feedback systems are undertaken as annual student surveys in areas including curriculum and teaching which may be conducted by the academic development unit, student union or at faculty or school level which generate statistical results. All universities around the world have such feedback systems. Some universities take the results seriously at senior management level, some only at academic teaching staff level and some only at a student level. A common problem is that these teaching survey results may only be seen by teachers, it doesn't matter whether the results are good or bad. In this paper, we present a dynamic curriculum development which systematically collects input or feedback from learners (students), teachers (academics) and industry panelists. We provide an incremental management approach to use these as a basis for new course development and strategic management of the improvement process of course development as well as a matrix on the measurement of how one utilizes the feedback for teaching and learning improvement and the value output from the triple feedback system.


Main Subjects

[1] Curtin University of Technology (2002), Curtin Strategic Plan on Teaching and Learning, 2002-2005. [2] Glatthorn A., Harris D.E. and Carr J.F., Curriculum Handbook - Chapter: Planning and Organizing for Curriculum Renewal, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ACSD). [viewed Oct 2003, verified 7 Jun 2004. [3] March C.J. and Willis G., Curriculum alternative approaches; Ongoing issues. 3rd Edition. Merrill Prentice-Hall, 2003. [4] Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) 2003/04 Budget paper: Outcomes and Output Group Information, 2003. [5] Hill J.R. and Hannafin M.J., Teaching and learning in digital environments: the resurgence of resource-based learning, Educational Technology, Research and Development, Vol.49, No.3, 2001, pp. 1042- 1629. [6] Morien R., Schmidenberg, Educating Information Systems Professionals: The Tertiary Education Challenge. APITITE '94 (Asia Pacific Information Technology in Training and Education), Brisbane, June, 1994.