Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Esfahan University of Art,Esfahan , Iran

3 Isfahan University of the Arts, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Collaborative architecture is considered as a strategic and contentious subject in the success of today’s architecture. As we know, a group does not only act as a set of people, but also goes beyond the sum of people’s abilities in some way. In such design, the building is the gradual expansion in design being beyond a single building, and it contains the social communications and the group of people who deal with design process. The purpose of this article is moving in the course of basic principles of thought in collaborative design. On the basis of such approach, this paper, studies the concept of group and team work in architecture so that recognizing collaborative design steps, we accompanied with a group of students in a student team design and defined their weak and strong points of movement in different steps. According to the importance of participatory architecture in the current age, the impacts of trainings for applying this activity are studied in the students. In order to study the training effects in increasing teamwork quality among the students, Isfahan art university students have been tested. This test has been done as two-hour sketches in groups of five people. This test had been in the research method in Univariant Hypothesis Test and according to the independency of the groups and equivalence of their variance in the society as students’t test (single variable test) for independent groups. These tests included a pre test done in ignorance. The students became familiar with teamwork and then a post test has been taken by the given students after their training course and explaining team work for them, the test results have been studied in this article. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

]1 ]براد بنت جفری، آموزش معماری، ترجمهی فرشته حبیب، برگرفته از کتاب آموزش معماران نوشتهی حسین سلطانزاده. انتشارات دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی، 1389 ،صفحه 29. ]2 ]سالوسترینی جیووانی، شیوهی آموزش پرسشها بسیار و پاسخها کم، ترجمهی احمد بدرطالعی، برگرفته از کتاب آموزش معماران نوشتهی حسین سلطان زاده، انتشارات دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی، 1389 ،صفحه 53. ]3 ]الوسون برایان، طراحان چگونه می اندیشند؟ ابهام زدایی از فرایند طراحی، ترجمه دکتر حمید ندیمی، نشر دانشگاه شهید بهشتی ،1324 ،صفحه 112. ]4 ]جعفرنیا محسن، مهندسی تفکر، انتشارات سیمای دانش، 1324 ،صفحه 51. [5] Luck R., Architect and user interaction: the spoken representation of form and functional meaning in early design conversations , March 2006. [6] Kohn A., Punished by rewards? Educational Leadership,Vol. 53, No. 1, 1995. [7] http://www.irvani.com/weblog/archives/2006/05 /post_54.php [8] http://blogfa53.blogfa.com/post-116.aspx ]9 ]رضایینژاد عبدالرضا، دستنامه مدیران، انتشارات موسسه خدمات فرهنگی رسا، تهران، 1385 ،صفحه .254 ]11 ]گینی تیم مک، طــراحی و فـــرایند طــراحی، کتاب آموزش معماران نوشته حسین سلطان زاده، انتشارات دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی، 1389 ،صفحه 138. [11] Joachim S. and Petra B,S., Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication, March, 2002. ]12 ]سرمد زهره، بازرگان عباس و حجازی الهه، روشهای تحقیق در علوم رفتاری، نشر آگه، پاییز، 1326، صفحه 289. ]13 ]سرمد زهره، بازرگان عباس و حجازی الهه، روشهای تحقیق در علوم رفتاری، نشر آگه، پاییز، 1326 ،صفحه .
CAPTCHA Image