فراتحلیل اثربخشی فناوری در پیشبرد اهداف آموزش ریاضی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی

2 گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

با توجه به پیشرفت سریع فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در عصر حاضر و در نتیجه افزایش قابل ملاحظه مطالعات مربوط به بررسی تأثیر فناوری در اثربخشی آموزش، پژوهش حاضر با هدف فراتحلیل و ترکیب نتایج پژوهش‌های انجام یافته در زمینه بررسی تأثیر استفاده از فناوری در آموزش ریاضی انجام گرفته است. جامعه پژوهشی، پژوهش-هایی است که به بررسی تاثیر استفاده از فناوری در پیشبرد اهداف آموزش ریاضی پرداخته بودند و با بررسی پیشینه تعداد 19 پژوهش در این زمینه یافت گردید. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که استفاده از فناوری به میزان 0.38 از واریانس متغیر دستیابی به اهداف آموزش ریاضی را پیش‌بینی می‌کند بنابراین در صورتی که فناوری به طور کامل در روش‌های تعلیم و تربیت ادغام شود می‌تواند به عنوان ابزاری موثر در بهبود یادگیری دانش‌آموزان در درس ریاضی عمل کند، لذا با توجه به اثربخشی استفاده از فناوری در آموزش ریاضی، ضروری است برنامه‌های درسی ریاضی به صورتی تدوین گردند که ارائه محتوا را با تلفیقی از فناوری همراه سازند.

چکیده تصویری

فراتحلیل اثربخشی فناوری در پیشبرد اهداف آموزش ریاضی

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of technology in advancing the goals of mathematics education

نویسندگان [English]

  • razieh alidehi ravandi 1
  • Mohammad Sadegh Taher Tolou Del 2
1 University of Shahid Rajaee
2 Department of Architecture & Urban Design, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran
چکیده [English]

The present study was aimed at the meta-analysis and synthesis of the results of research on the impact of the use of technology in mathematical education considering the rapid progress of ICT in the present age and, consequently, the significant increase in studies on the impact of technology on the effectiveness of education. The statistical community is a research that studies the impact of using technology in advancing the goals of mathematical education and with the review of the history, 19 studies were found in this field. The research findings showed that the use of technology at 0.38 of variable variance predicts the achievement of the goals of mathematical education, so if technology can be fully integrated into teaching methods, it can be as an effective tool to improve students'' learning in mathematics, therefore, considering the effectiveness of using technology in mathematical education, it is essential that the mathematical curriculum be formulated to bring content with a combination of technology.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Meta-analysis
  • Effectiveness
  • Technology
  • Teaching Math

[1] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, The National Council, Virginia, USA.

 

[2] Colbert, J.A., & Boyd, K. E., & Clark, K.A., & Guan, S., & Harris, J.B., & Kelly, M.A. and Thompson, A.D. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogicalcontent knowledge (TPCK) for educators (edited), Routledge: New York.

 

[3] Bakırcı, H., & Bilgin, A. K., & Simsek, A. (2011). The effects of simulation technique and worksheets on formal operational stage in science and technology lessons. Procedia-Social and BehavioralSciences,15,1462-1469.

 

[4] Koong, C. S., & Wu, C. Y. (2011). The applicability of interactive item templates in varied knowledge types. Computers & Education, 56(3), 781-801.

 

[5] Li, D. D., & Lim, C. P. (2008). Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers & Education, 50(4),1394-1410.

 

[6] Furio, D., & Juan, M. C., & Seguí, I., & Vivo, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: A comparative study.  Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,31(3), 189-201.

 

[7] Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14-30.

 

[8] Ahmad, K., & Lily, S. (1994). The effectiveness of computer applications: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on computing in Education, 27(1), 48-61.

 

[9] Andrews, R., Freeman, A., Hou, D., McGuinn, N., Robinson, A., & Zhu, J. (2007). The effectiveness of information and communication technology on the learning of written English for 5 to 16 year olds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 325-336.

 

[10] Torgerson, C. J., & Zhu, D. (2003). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in English, 5-16. In R. Andrews (Ed.), The impact of ICT on literacy education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

 

[11] Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 290-322.

 

[12] Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391.

 

[13] Archer, K., Savage, R., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., Wood, E., Gottardo, A., & Chen, V. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 78, 140-149.

 

[14] Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88-113.

 

[15] Christmann, E. P., & Badgett, J. L. (2003). A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on elementary students'' academic achievement. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 91-104.

 

[16] Fletcher-Finn, C., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(3), 219-241.

 

[17] Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in human behavior, 7(1), 75-94.

 

[18] Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students'' mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243.

 

[19] Liao, Y. K. C. (1998). Effects of hypermedia versus traditional instruction on students'' achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 341-359.

 

[20] Liao, Y. K. C. (1999). Effects of hypermedia on students'' achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(3), 255-277.

 

[21] Liao, Y. K. C. (2007). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students'' achievement in Taiwan: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 48(2), 216-233.

 

[22] Niemiec, R. P., Samson, G., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The effects of computer based instruction in elementary schools: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20(2), 85-103.

 

[23] Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M. B., & Ronau, R. N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra a systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 372-400.

 

[24] Ryan, A. W. (1991). Meta-analysis of achievement effects of microcomputer applications in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 161-184.

 

[25] Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427-515.

 

[26] Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016a). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students'' learning performance: A metaanalysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.

 

[27] Safarian, S., & Fallah, V., & Mirhoseini, S.H. (2011). Comparing the educational effect with educational software and method Traditional teaching on learning mathematical lessons, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1 (2). [In Persian]

 

[28] Zamani, B.E., & Saeedi, M., & Saeedi, A. (2013). Effectiveness and Sustainability of the Effect of Using Multimedia on Self-efficacy Educational motivation for math lessons, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2 (4), 67-87. [In Persian]

 

[29] Bavi, A. (2013). The effect of education through multimedia software on math performance of male students in Tehran, Journal of Social Psychology, 8 (25), 55-69. [In Persian]

 

[30] Koohbanani, S., & Alizadeh, H., & Hashemi, Jh., & Sarami, Gh., & Koohbanani, S. (2014). The Effectiveness of Computer Training Program on the Executive Functions of Students with Mental Disorders, Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences, 11 (3), 208-218. [In Persian]

 

[31] Shahamat, F., & Kadivar, P., & Farzad, V. (2009). Relationship between cognitive styles and students'' progress in mathematics and chemistry in a computer-based learning environment in comparison with the traditional environment, Studies in Education and Psychology, 9 (1), 143-156. [In Persian]

 

[32] Zamani, B.E., & Saeedi, Z., & Abedi, A. (2012). Effectiveness and Sustainability of the Effect of Multimedia on Self-Regulation and Academic Performance of the First Year High School Mathematics, New Educational Approaches, 6 (2), 1-22. [In Persian]

 

[33] Shekhzadeh, M., & Mehrmohamadi, M. (2012). Elementary mathematics education software based on constructivist approach and its effectiveness measurement, Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations,3 (9), 33-46. [In Persian]

 

[34] Norouzi, D., & Ahmadzadehbayani, A., & Aghabarati, N. (2012). The effect of multimedia training on learning and memorization of mathematical lessons Autistic boy students, Quarterly of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals,1 (4), 23-50. [In Persian]

 

[35] Zarea, H., & Amini, F. (2017). The Effectiveness of "Working Memory" Training Software on the Functions of Attention Students with Mental Disorders, Journal of Learning Disabilities,6 (1), 60-79. [In Persian]

 

[36] Asare, A., & Zadshir, M. (2017). The effect of computer-aided math education on the attitude of math students in class 9, Journal of Family andResearch,14 (35), 49-64. [In Persian]

 

[37] Motamedi, A., & Barghiirani, Z., & Karimi, B. (2013). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Methods of Direct Education, Computer Aided Learning and Combination on the Reduction of Problems in Students with Mental Disorders, Journal of Learning Disabilities,2 (2), 76-100. [In Persian]

 

[38] Zameni, F., & Kardan, S. (2011). The Influence of Information and Communication Technology in Learning Mathematical Lessons, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences,1 (1), 23-38. [In Persian]

 

[39] Rastegarpour, H., & Yadolahi, M. (2011). The Effect of Dynamic and Static Graphic Images on Geometry Learning, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences,1 (2), 63-76. [In Persian]

 

[40] Jangizehishastan, H., & Zareazavaraki, A., & Niliahmadabadi, M., & Pezeshk, Sh., & Delavar, A. (2017). Educational multimedia Effect on the amount of learning, motivation for academic achievementAnd the participation of mentally retarded students in math lessons, CommunicationTechnologyinCurriculum,2 (3), 15-28. [In Persian]

 

[41] Yavari, M., & Yaryari, F., & Rastegarpour, H. (2006). Effectiveness of Educational Software "Student Account" on Dyscalculic Students'' Math Learning, Research on Exceptional Children,6 (3), 713-734. [In Persian] 

 

[42] Yaryari, F., & Afrooz, Gh., & Mirmohamadi, F. (2010). The study of the effect of basic education program (Omid) on primary school students with Down syndrome in Tehran, Research on Exceptional Children,10 (1), 37-48. [In Persian]

 

[43] Zareazavaraki, A., & Gharibi, F. (2012). The effect of multimedia training on the learning and memorization of students in grade 4 mental retardation in Arak, Quarterly of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals,2 (5), 1-20. [In Persian]

 

[44] Moradi, R., & Maleki, H. (2015). The Effect of Computer-Aided Educational Computer Games on Student''s Math With Failure to Learn Math, Quarterly of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals,5 (18), 27-44. [In Persian]

 

[45] Aminifar, A., & Salehsedghpour, B., & Valinejhadtorkamani, F. (2011). The role of technology in mathematical learning, Journal of Technology of Education,5 (4), 265-272. [In Persian]

 

[46] Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2007). Introduction to statistics in psychology, pp: 21–43.

 

[47] Pigott, T. D. (2012). Advances in Meta-Analysis, New York: Springer.  

 

[48] Bolier, L., & Haverman, M., & Westerhof , GJ., & Riper, H., & Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions:a metaanalysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC public health, BioMed Central Ltd,13(1):119-126.

 

[49] Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

 

[50]  Bassant, K. C. (1995). Factors associated with types of mathematics anxiety in college students. Journal ofResearch in Mathematics Education, 26, 327- 345.

 

[51] Yenilmez, K., Girginer, N. & Uzun, A. O. (2007). Mathematics anxiety and attitude level of students of the faculty of economics and business administrator; The Turkey model.International Mathematical Forum, 2(41), 1997 – 2002.

 

[52] Aiken, J. R. & Lewis, R. (2007). The effect of attitudes on performance in mathematics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 19-24.