تاثیر کاربست الگوی آموزش مبتنی بر محیط های یادگیری سیار بر حضور اجتماعی و حضور تدریس یادگیرندگان مدارس هوشمند در درس ریاضی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علامه طباطبایی

2 دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران

3 معاون آموزشی دانشگاه

4 دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

5 دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

هدف از انجام این تحقیق بررسی تاثیر کاربست الگوی آموزش مبتنی بر محیط های یادگیری سیار بر حضور اجتماعی و حضور تدریس دانش آموزان مدارس هوشمند در درس ریاضی بوده است. در این پژوهش از روش تحقیق ترکیبی استفاده شد. در قسمت تحقیق کمی از روش نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش آزمون و پس آزمون با گروه کنترل استفاده شده است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل کلیه‌ دانش‌آموزانی هستند که در شهر تهران در مدارس هوشمند مشغول به تحصیل می‌باشند. جهت گزینش حجم نمونه مورد نظر با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای چند مرحله ای از میان مدارس هوشمند شهر تهران، یک مدرسه انتخاب و سرانجام 15 نفر در گروه آزمایش و 15 نفر در گروه کنترل قرار گرفتند. گروه آزمایش تحت آموزش محتوای تهیه شده توسط محقق از طریق سیستم مدیریت یادگیری سیار که بر اساس الگوی ارائه شده طراحی گردیده بود، قرار گرفتند. جهت بررسی فرضیه های اول و دوم تحقیق از تجزیه و تحلیل کواریانس چند متغیره استفاده شد. نتایج حاکی از آن بود که کاربرد این الگو بر تمام اَبعاد حضور اجتماعی و حضور تدریس در گروه آزمایش نسبت به گروه کنترل (در پس آزمون) موثر بوده است.

چکیده تصویری

تاثیر کاربست الگوی آموزش مبتنی بر محیط های یادگیری سیار بر حضور اجتماعی و حضور تدریس یادگیرندگان مدارس هوشمند در درس ریاضی

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Impact use of education model based on mobile learning environments on Social peresence and teaching peresence for intellectual schools students in mathematical lesson

نویسندگان [English]

  • sonia mosa ramezani 1
  • Esmaeil Zaraii Zavaraki 2
  • Mohammadreza Nili 3
  • Ali Delavar 4
  • Mehran Farajollahi 5
1 Phd educational technology tehran iran
2 Educational Technology, Psychology and Educational Sciences , Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor ,Department of Educational Technology, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Measurement and Measurement, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Iran, Tehran.
5 Associate Professor , Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences ,payame noor university, Iran, Tehran.
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is Impact use of education model based on mobile learning environments on Social peresence and teaching peresence for Smart schools students in mathematical lesson. in this research goal, a combination research method was used.In this research we have been used some semi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design with control group.research statistical society are including all girl students are studying in Tehran Smart schools. For testing we have been used respected model volume with using of fast step cluster sampling way between Tehran Smart schools with suitable volume so that finally with pay attention to the resulted test decrease , 15 people have been settled in test group and 15 people in control group. Test group have been settled under provided education by researcher via mobile learning management system. That have been designed based on given model. For studying first and second we were used it by Multivaraite covariance analysis. Results was an indication of that using this sample at all dimensions of social and teaching presence in testing group had more increase than control group. Moreover, total score of social and teaching presence have been increased tangibly more than control group score on prosecution stage.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Educational design patterns
  • Mobile learning
  • Mobile learning environments
  • presence
  • Smart school

[1] Yosefi,F.,& KamranZadeh,S. (2015). Study of Effective factors on improving the quality of learning environments in primary school. Journal of Engineering Organization report.86. PP 61-53.[in Persian].

[2] Banisi,P. (2013). Training from traditional to virtual. Fourteen o’clock. 30/01/1395.Retrieved from www.isuw.ir. [in Persian].

[3] Nozari,D., & Noriyan,M. (2003). Elementay school curriculum. Islamic Azad University Tehran South Branch.[in Persian].

[4] Mellow,P. (2005). The media generation: maximize learning by getting mobile. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from: http://www.ascilite.org. au/ conferences/ brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/53_Mellow.pdf

[5] Safarzadeh,M.,Manochehri,K. (2009). Learning through mobile devices.Second international e-municipality conference. (April15-16). Tehran: Ministry of the Interrior. Organization of municipalities of the country. [in Persian].

[6] Abdollahi,M. (2007). Mobile learning and its role in future e-learning.CD second e-learning conference.23 to 25 october .Zahedan. Sistan and Balochestan.[in Persian].

[7] Attaran,M. (2009). Futuristic curriculum Tomorrow’s school Monthly. 5(6).[in persian].

[8] Keengwe,J.,& Bhargava,M. (2014). Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Educational Information technology,19 737-746..

[9] Barak,M.,& Harward,J.,& Lerman,S. (2007). Studio-based learning via wireless notebooks: a case of a Java programming course.International Journal Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1(1), 15–29..

[10]Garrison, R.D.,& Anderson, T., & Archer,W. (2000). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Unpublished manuscript found April 6, 2009 at Retreved http://communities of inquiry.com / files / CogPres Final.pdf.

[11] Rue,H.K.,& Parsons,D. (2018). Innovative Mobile Learning:Techniques and Technologies(translated by : Esmaeil Zaraii Zavaraki,Sonia M osa Ramezani and Elaheh Velayati). Tehran: Donyaye Eghtesad Publisher (Date of publication in original language 2009). [in Persian].

[12] Garrison,D.R., & Cleveland-Innes,M. (2005).” Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough”. The American Journal of Distance Education,19(3),148-133.

[13] Garrison a,D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning: Social, teaching and cognitive presence. In C. Howard et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance and online learning (2nd ed., p. 352). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

[14] Garrison,D.R.,& Arbaugh,J.B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(8), 157-172..

[15] Ruhlandt,R.R. (2010). Differences in retention, social presence, cognitive presence and teaching presence in fully online and
blended courses. Doctoral dissertation, Regent University.

[16] Zamani,B.B.E.,Nikonezhad,S.(2014). Comparison of the interaction and social peresence of virtual and non virtual learners in terms of demographic factors and academic success. Applied sociology. 55,119-134. [in Persian].

[17] Ogara ,S.O.,& Chang E.& Koh,C.E., & Prybutok,V.R. (2014). Investigating factors affecting social presence and user satisfaction with Mobile Instant Messaging. Computers in Human Behavior 36(2014)453–459. Journal homepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh. http:// dx.doi.org.hb.2014.03.064.

[18] Rockinson,A.J. (2009). The impact of asynchronous and synchronous instruction and discussion cognitive presence, social presence, teaching presence and learning Doctoral dissertation, Regent University.

[19] Salloum,S.R. (2011). Student perception of computer-mediated communication tools in online learning: helpfulness and effects on teaching, social and cognitive presence. Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Carolina.

[20] Stead,G.,& Sharpe,B.,& Anderson,P.& Philpott,M. (2006). Emerging Technology for learning Coventry. UK. Becta.

[21] Keys,j.p. (1997). world of learning at the school. Translation of Raeisdana,F. Tehran.research institute of education.[in Persian].

[22] Churchill,D.,& Lu, J.,& Chiu,T.K.F.& Bob Fox Editors. (2016). Mobile Learning Design. Theories and Application. Springer. Singapore Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London ISSN 2196-4963.. DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0..

[23] Garrison,D.R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice (3rd Edition). London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate. Net.

[24] Yodkamlue,B. (2008). Online texts of non-native speakers in an L2 electronic discussion forum:An analysis of social presence and cognitivr presence. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina. Available from ProQuest, UMI Number: 3321451.

[25] Katernyak, I., Ekman, S., Ekman, A., Sheremet M., & Loboda, V. (2009). eLearning: from social presence to co-creation in virtual education community. Interactive Technology & Smart Education, 6(4), 215-222.

[26] Alaulamie,L.A. (2014) .Teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence as predictors of students’ satisfaction in an online program at a Saudi university. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University.and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368..

[27] Thomas,R.A.,& West,R.E.,& Borup,J. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. Internet and Higher Education 33 (2017) 61–73. Contents lists available at Science Direct. Retreved from http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003..

[28] Rockinson-Szapkiw,A,J. (2009). The Impact Of Asyncronous And Ssyncronous Instruction And Discussion On Cognitive Presence, Social, Presence, Teaching Presence, And learning Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Doctor of Education Degree.

[29] Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 31-45..

[30] Bangert,A. (2008). The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(1)34..

[31] Kozan,K., & Richardson,J.C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social,
teaching,and cognitive presence. Internet and Higher Education, 21,68e73. Retrieved from http:/ /dx. Doi. Org/.10.1016/j. compedu2014,10,015.