ارائه مدل یادگیری الکترونیک بر رضایت مندی اساتید از یادگیری در واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان اردبیل

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه مدیریت، واحد پارس اباد مغان، داشگاه ازاد اسلامی، پارس اباد مغان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدل یادگیری الکترونیک بر رضایت‌مندی اساتید از یادگیری در واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان اردبیل است. تحقیق حاضر در دو مرحله پیمایشی و دلفی انجام شد. جامعۀ آماری تحقیق را در مرحلۀ اول، اساتید حق‌التدریس و اعضای هیات علمی و در مرحلۀ دوم، اعضای هیات علمی رشتۀ مدیریت واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان اردبیل تشکیل می‌دادند تعداد نمونه در مرحلۀ اول 136 نفر و در مرحلۀ دوم 20 نفر بودند. روش نمونه‌گیری در مرحلۀ اول، تصادفی طبقه‌ای و در مرحلۀ دوم، مبتنی بر هدف بود. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامۀ محقق‌‌ساخته یادگیری الکترونیکی بود. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از روش مدل اندازه‌گیری ساختاری (تحلیل عاملی تأییدی) و برای تعیین یادگیری الکترونیکی از روش سه دوره‌ای دلفی استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحقیق شامل 77 متغیّر آشکار و 8 مفهوم اساسی (زیرساخت‌های فناوری اطلاعات، کیفیت سیستم آموزشی، خودیادگیری، حمایت از یادگیرندگان، شناسایی و ثبت نیازهای آموزشی، مدیریت ارزش‌ها، مواد آموزشی، آموزش مبتنی بر جامعه) بود در مرحلۀ اول، برازش مدل تأیید شد و نشان داد که سازه‌ها در سطح رضایت‌بخش روایی قرار دارند. در مرحلۀ دوم؛ کیفیت سیستم آموزشی، زیرساخت‌های فناوری اطلاعات، خودیادگیری و حمایت از یادگیرندگان، به عنوان ابعاد یادگیری الکترونیکی شناسایی شدند.

چکیده تصویری

ارائه مدل یادگیری الکترونیک بر رضایت مندی اساتید از یادگیری در واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان اردبیل

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing E-learning model on teachers' satisfaction from learning in Ardabil Islamic Azad University

نویسنده [English]

  • Kheyrollah Sarboland
Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Parsabad Moghan Branch, Parsabad Moghan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to provide e-learning model on teachers' satisfaction from learning in branches of Ardabil Islamic Azad University. The present study was conducted on the basis of Delphi and survey models of research. In the first stage, participants of this study were the lecturers and faculty members, and in the second stage, were the faculty members of management in all branches of Ardabil Islamic Azad University. Samples of the first stage were 136 subjects and in the second stage 20 subjects. Sampling method in first stage was random-stratified and in the second atage it was purposive sampling. Data collection tools were e-learning researcher-made questionnaire. For data analysis Structural Measurement Model (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) was used and for specifiying e-learning, Delphi three-staged method was used. Findings included 77 concrete variables and 8 basic concepts(IT infrastructures, quality of educational system, self-learning, learners' support, identifying and recording educational needs, management of values, educational materials,society-based learning). In the first stage, the appropriacy of model was approved and showed that the structures were in satisfactory level of validity, and in the second stage, quality of educational system, IT infrastructures, self-learning and learners' support, were identified as the dimensions of e-learning.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • e-Learning
  • satisfaction
  • Faculty members
  • education system
  • Islamic Azad University units

[1].Kareemzadegan Moghaddam, D., Khodaparast, M., & Unity, D. (2011). Evaluation of effective factors on e-learning reader satisfaction. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 27(2), 487-462 [in Persian]

[2]. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell

[3].Mohammadzade Nasrabadi, M., Mousavi, M., & Pouya, M. (2014). Attitude analysis and facilitating factors of teachers and teachers of Payame Noor University on Electronic learning (Case study: Payame Noor University of Ardebil). Research and Information Processing Process, 30(2), 466-443. [In Persian]

[4]. Khan B.H.A (2000). Framework for web-based learning. Englewood Cliffs‚ NJ: Educational Technology Publications..

[5]. Wanting T.L, Weight C., Gallaher, J., La Fleur J., Wang, C., Confer, A. e-learning: A review of literature. US: Urbana Champaign University of Illinois.

[6].Safari Jahromi, G., Shafiei Nikabadi, M., & Maleki, M. (2014). Explaining technical, financial and managerial barriers in using e-learning for human resource education: A study of government organizations in Semnan. Journal of Training in Police Sciences, 3(1), 29-41. [In Persian]

[7]. Fallah Nejad A., Janali, A. (2011). Medical examination to improve the performance of the medical skills using of information technology and e-learning. Paper presented in the 1st  International Congress on Health Information Technology and the Second Congress Managers, Medical Universities throughout the Country. Sari, Iran.

[8]. Safavi A. (2007). E-content criteria and standards from e-learning perspective. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 13(1), 27-52.

[9]. Alavi S. H. (2009). Rapid e-learning in medical education. Education Strategies in Medical Science, 2(1), 27-33. [In Persian]

[10].Kazemi, A., & Nematollahi, M. (2014). A proposed model for describing effective factors on the continuity of continuing education in electronic learning. Journal of Electronic Learning, Media Magazine, 5(2), 79 [In Persian]

[11]. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology user: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.

[12]. Crosby, P. H. (2004). Quality without tears: The art of hasher free management. New York: Mc Grow Hill.

[13]. Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001).A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.

[14].De Melo Pereira, F.A, Martins Ramos, A.S., Gouvêa, M.A., & da Costa, M.F. (2015). Satisfaction and continuous use intention of e-learning service in Brazilian public organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 139–148.

[15].Ziaei, E., Moslemi, M., & Sharif Moghaddam, H. (2013). Effect of traditional and electronic services of public libraries on user satisfaction (Case study of West Azarbaijan public libraries) Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 1(3), 39-51.  [In Persian]

[16].Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behavior in developing countries: A structural equation model, Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 153–163.

[17].Yang, Q., Pang, C., Yen, L., Tarn, & J.M. (2015). Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 9–24.

[18].Elahie, S. H., Khosravi, B., Hasanzadeh, A., & Khosravi, H. (2012). The effect of e-readiness on the success of electronic insurance using structural equation method. Insurance Research Journal, 27(2), 134-111. [In Persian]

[19].Wu, Y. C., Hsieh, L. F., Lu, J. J. (2015). What’s the relationship between learning satisfaction and continuing learning intention? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2849- 2854.

[20]. Pilgrim, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computer & Education‚ 37, 163-178.

[21].Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., Tari, A., & Ladjailia, A. (2016). Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis, Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 463-471.

[22]. Martínez‐Argüelles, M., Castán, J., & Juan, A. (2010). How do students measure service quality in e‐learning? A case study regarding an Internet‐based university. Electronic Journal of eLearning 8(2) 151 ‐ 160

[23].Chow, W.S., & Shi, S, (2014), Investigating students’ satisfaction and continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation– confirmation model. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1145-1149.

[24]. Hajizadeh, A., & Asghari, M. (2011). Statistical analysis and methods by looking at research method in biotechnology and health sciences. Tehran: Academic Jihad [In Persian]

[25].Bahramian, H., R., & Fe, J. (2014). The effect of information systems quality on individuals and organizations in respect of users' satisfaction and desire. Journal of Trilateral Human Resource Studies, 3(11), 48-31. [In Persian]

[26].Jafari Navimipour, N., & Zareie, B. (2015). A model for assessing the impact of e-learning systems on employees’ satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 475-485.

[27].Asoodar, M., Vaezi, S. H., & Izanloo, B. (2016). Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation, Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 704-716.

[28]. Jamali, A., Ghorchian, N., Lebanani, M. (2012). The role of spirituality in promoting the quality of higher education: Conceptual model. Future Studies Journal of Management, 23(96), 77-93. [In Persian]

[29]. Zare Chahuki, M. A. (2010). Multivariate analysis methods (pamphlet). Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran.  [In Persian]

[30]. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.

[31]. Momeni, M., & Qayumi, A. F. (2009). Statistical Analysis using SPSS. Tehran: Author's Publisher. [In Persian]

[32]. Fornell, C., & Larckerm F.D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

[33]. Ghasemi, V. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling in social research using Amos graphics. Tehran: Sociologists Press. [In Persian]

[34].Taqwa, M., H., Rajabpour, A., & Babakamdi, S., (2014) Factors affecting web-based e-learning Systems in in-service training. Technology Management Studies, 1(3), 188-165. [In Persian]

[35]. Emami, H., Aghdasi, M., & Asousheh, A. (2009). Electronic learning in medical education. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 33(2),102-111.

[36].Al-Qeisi, K., & Hegazy, A., (2015). Consumer online behaviour: A perspective on Internet banking usage in three non-western countries. Economics & Finance, 23, 386 – 390.

 [37]. Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Chule, P. (2001) Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 5-36.

 [38]. Sieglel, S.m & Castellan, Jr N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill