Yarmohammadian, M. (2002). Principles of curriculum planning. Tehran: Yadvare. [In Persian].
 Mehrmohammadi, M. (2010). Curriculum: principles and perspectives. Mashhad: Astane Qods Razavi. [In Persian].
 Krahnke, K. (1987). Approaches to syllabus design for foreign language teaching. New York: Prentice Hall.
Yalden, J. (1983). The communicative syllabus: Evolution, design, and implementation. Oxford: Pergamon.
 Brindley, G. (1984). Needs analysis and subjective setting in the adult migrant education program. New South Wales: Adult Migrant Education Services for the Adult Migrant Education Program.
 GÜRBÜZ, A. (2013). Proposing a syllabus desıgn for oral communicative classes regarding teachers’ and students’ perceptions of modified output. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep.
 Long, M. (Ed.). (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Munby, J (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Safarnavade, K., Aliasgari, M., Moosapoor, N., & Annanisarab, M. R. (2010). Content analysis of English textbooks in high schools and evaluate them based on CLT approach, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 5(17), 86 -114 [In Persian].
Ministry of education of Iran. (2009). Document of strategic reform in education system horizon. Tehran: Education Supreme Council [In Persian].
 Alavi Moghaddam, B., & Kheirabadi, R. (2014). Examining the achievements of Seventh grade Englishtextbook based on the national curriculum. Journal of Educational Innovations, 51(3), 23-26[In Persian].
 Richards, J. C.(2006). Communicative Language Teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Terrell, T.D. (1982). The natural approach to language teaching: An update. Modern Language Journal, 66 (2), 121-132.
 Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1994).Cooperative learning in the Classroom. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
 Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework for task-based learning. In J. Willis and D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (pp.235-256). Oxford: Heinemann.
 Nunan. D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. UK: Prentice Hall.
 Duff, P. A. (2014).Communicative language teaching, In M. Celce-Murcia, D., M. Brinton and M. a., Snow, (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or Foreign Language (pp.15-31).USA: Sherrise Roehr.
 Celce-Murcia, M. (2014). An overview of language teaching methods and approaches, In M. Celce-Murcia, D., M. Brinton and M. A., Snow, (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or Foreign Language (pp. 2-14).US: Sherrise Roehr.
 Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T., S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Brown, H., D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
 Harmer, J. (1999). The practice of English language teaching. Essex: Longman.
 Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1997). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in Communicative Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 141-152.
 Savignon, Sandra J. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
 Widdowson, H.G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Brumfit, C. J. (2001). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University press.
 Johnson, R. K. (1989). The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Sadrzade. M.(2005). Communicative approach and Audio- Lingual method. Foreign Language Studies, 23, 119-138[In Persian].
 Kiani, G. R., Navidynia, H., & Momenian, M. (2011). Reviewing the national curriculum approach to teaching of foreign languages, Journal of linguistic researches and comparative literature, 2 (2), 185-209[In Persian].
 Hossainpour, Z. (2015). An overall evaluation of Iranian English language textbook: English for Schools “Prospect 1”. (Unpublished master’s thesis).University of Tehran, Tehran.
 Pishgham, R., & Rostami, Z. (2017). Evaluation of Grade seven English textbook: Developmental, individual-differences, relationship-based model. Journal of Humanities Program Critiques, 15(3), 25-42 [In Persian].
 Mahmoody, H., & Morady, M. (2017). Review and evaluation of quality of grade 1 textbook: Emphasis on foreign language teaching methodology. Journal of Humanities Program Critiques, 15(3), 179-196 [In Persian].
 Mirzaee, A. & Tahery, F. (2015). Evaluation of Grammar in English Textbook 1: Review of changes. Journal of Humanities Program Critiques, 15(3), 191-206 [In Persian].
 Rezvani, R., Mihankhah, Z., & Haghshenas, B. (2017).On the correspondence between new English textbook and final exam questions. Journal of New Approaches to Educational Management, 7(3), 179-191 [In Persian].
 Abbasian, G.R., & Hosseinifar, H. (2015).The teachability of the materials developed for Iranian EFL junior secondary program: Prospect I. Quarterly Journal of Research on Issues of Education, 49(2), 5-31.
 Kiani, G. R. (2015).From expectation to reality: Teachers’ perspectives of the newly developed English textbook (Prospect 1) of the first grade of junior high school. Quarterly Journal of Research on Issues of Education, 49(2), 51-74.
 John Gray, J. (2013). Critical perspectives on language teaching materials. US: Palgrave Macmillan.
 Drisko, J., W., & Maschi, T. (2016).Content analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Freeman, D., L. (1986). Technique and principle in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Ghanbari, A. (2013). Understanding CLT approach in English teaching. Retrieved from http://www.cltteacher.ir/index.php [In Persian].
 Jacobs, G., & Farrel, T. (2003). Understanding and implementing the CLT paradigm. RELC Journal, 41(1), 5-30.