فصلنامه علمی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی‌سینا، همدان ، ایران

2 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش آموزش الکترونیکی در مراکز آموزش عالی کشاورزی ایران و تعیین مؤثرترین سازه‌ها بر پذیرش این فناوری از سوی اعضاء هیأت علمی و دانشجویان دوره تحصیلات تکمیلی است. این پژوهش بـا اسـتفاده از پیمـایش و با بهره‌گیری از تکنیک آماری چند متغیره "تحلیل مسیر" انجـام شد. جامعة آماری در این پژوهش، کـه متشکل از اعضاء هیأت علمی و دانشجویان دوره تحصیلات تکمیلی مراکز آموزش عالی کشاورزی ایران هستند. برای سنجش میزان پایایی پرسشنامه، با بهره‌گیری از یک مطالعه راهنما در دانشگاه بوعلی‌سینا و تکمیل 40 پرسشنامه و تحلیـل نتـایج، مقدار پایایی با محاسبه ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه گردید. میزان آلفای کرونباخ کلی برای پرسشنامه که همان میزان قابلیت اعتماد برای 68 گویه پرسشنامه بود، عدد 5/88‌% به دست آمد که عدد قابل قبولی بوده و نشان‌دهنده پایایی بالای پرسشنامه است. در مجموع، تعداد 646 پرسشنامه از جامعه آماری پژوهش در چهار دانشگاه جمع‌آوری شد.

چکیده تصویری

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Checking the e-learning acceptability of Iranian agricultural higher education centers from the viewpoints of faculty staff and graduate students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Kh. Mirzaei 1
  • H. Saadi 1
  • S.H. Movahedmohamadi 2
  • R. Movahedi 1

1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan. Iran

2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tehran University, Karaj. Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effective factors of e-learning adoption in agricultural higher education universities of Iran and to determine the most effective structures on the acceptance of this technology by the faculty members and graduate students. This researchwas performed to measure the acceptance using survey and the multivariate statistical technique of path analyses. Statistical population of this research consisted of faculty members and postgraduate students in Iran’s higher agricultural education centers. Total Cronbach Alpha of the questionnaire, for the reliability of the 68 items of the questionnaire, was 88.5 % that is an acceptable figure which demonstrates the high reliability of the questionnaire. In total, 646 questionnaires were collected from 4 universities(Tehran University, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hormozgan University and Torbat Heydariyeh University). After multivariate statistical analysis ‘Path analysis’ and through calculating Beta Coefficients for different routes, the importance of each path was determined. The results showed that if members of the faculty and postgraduate students of higher education of agriculture in Iran get this reflection that the use of e-learning to carry out their educational activities is useful and reliable at higher agricultural education centers, even those people are not consistent with their subjective norms and have risks, they will continue to use e-learning. From the perspective of the respondents, e-learning is a safe and appropriate education. Therefore, possible risks in such training in virtual environments does not affect their attitude towards this type of training.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • e-Learning
  • Acceptance of Technology
  • Higher Education
  • Agricultural Education
  • path analysis
  • Information Technology

[1] Aury, MC. (2005). Agricultural Education Students’ Perception of WebCT in Puerto Rico. Paper presented at the IMPACT 2005, 7th Annual WebCT User Conference; San Francisco, California.Retrieved  from: http://webct.confex.com/webct/2005/preliminaryprogram/ abstract_1176.htm

 [2] Kim, H. J., Mannino, M., & Nieschwietz, R. J. (2009).   Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: Impact of technology features and complexity. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10, 214-228.

 [3] Sheng, Z., Jue, Z., & Weiwei, T. (2008). Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective. Tsinghua Scienceand Technology, 13(3), 312-317.

 [4] Zhou, Y., &   Zhang, J.P. (2008). A quantitative approach to eMM. In The Proceedings of ICWL (pp. 69-72).Shanghai.

 [5] Kim., S. H. (2008). Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Journalof Information & Management, 45(5), 387-393.

 [6] Malik, M. (2010). Factor effecting learner’s satisfaction towards e-Learning: A conceptual framework. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3),77-82.

 [7] Tanrıkulu, Z., Tugcu, C., & Yilmaz, S. (2010). E-University: Critical success factors. Procedia- Social andBehavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1253-1259.

 [8] Farrel, G.A., Cubit, K.A., Bobrowski, C.L., & Salmon, P. (2007). Using the WWW to teach undergraduate nurses clinical communication. Nurse education today, 27(5), 427-35.

 [9] Alkhalaf, S., Drew, S., & Alhussain, T. (2012). Assessing the impact of e-learning systems on learners: A survey study the KSA. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 98- 104.

 [10] Khan, B.H. (2001).  A framework for Web-based learning. Web-based training, (Eds.), NJ: Web- Based Traning, (pp. 75-98).

 [11] Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-202.

 [12] Liaw, S.S., & Huang, H.M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.

 [13] Mortagy, Y., & Boghikian-Whitby, S. (2010). A longitudinal comparative study of student perceptions in on. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6(1), 23-44.

 [14] DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.

 [15] Liaw, S.S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-73.

 [16] Buzzetto- More, N. (2008). Student perceptions of various e-learning components. Interdisciplinary. Journal Learning and Learning Objects, 4(1), 113-35.

 [17] George, J.F. (2006). The theory of planned behavior and internet purchasing. Internet Research, 14(3), 198-212.

 [18] Harrison, D.A., Meykytyn, P.P., & Riemenschneider, C.K. (2010). Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small businesses: Theory and empirical test. Information SystemsResearch, 8(2), 171-195.

 [19] Asemi, A. (2013). Metadata in e-learning environment, Journal of Electronic Research Institute for Scientific Information and Documents of Iran, 4(5), 16-24 [In Persian [.

 [20] Horton, W., & Horton, K. (2010).  E-learning tools and technologies (Trans. K. MehdiPooataie). Teahran: Dibagaran Publications. [In Persian [.

 [21] Momenirad, A. (2009). An investigation the quality of information technology field in e-learning courses at K. N. Toosi University of Technology according with e-learning standards. (Unpublisehd Master'sthesis).  Educational Science & Psychology Faculty, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian).

 [22] Talaei Mashouf, A. A. (2011). An investigation the adaptation of themathematic e-learning program at K. N. Toosi University ofTechnology according to the behavioral, cognitive and structuralprinciples. (Unpublisehd Master's thesis). Educational Science & Psychology Faculty, Allameh Tabatabat University, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)

 [23].Ghaedi, B. (2010).  The evaluation of virtual learning curriculum from the Viewpoints on computer engineering learners and professors, (Unpublisehd Master’s thesis), Tarbiat MoallemUniversity, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian [.

 [24] Karimzadegan Moghadam, D., Khodaparast, M., & Vahdat, D. (2011). An evaluation of the factors that effect on the learner satisfaction in elearning program. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Research Institute forInformation Science & Technology, 27(2), 461-478 (in Persian).

 [25] Rezaie, M. (2010).  The Common Theories On Accepting Information and Communication Technology, QuarterlyJournal of Communication Research, 4(60), 63-93.

 [26] Rahmani, B. (2011). The analytical study on the content of Vocational Training Courses. Tehran:  School of Hadith Sciences of Shahre Rey.

 [27] Sheykhshoaee, F. (2006). Investigating the factors affecting the Acceptance of Information Technology by librarians in the Technical Schools of Tehran State Universities: Applicability: Technology Acceptance Model, (Unpublisehd Master’s thesis). Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian [

 [28] Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19-42.

 [29] Tung, F. Ch., & Chang, S.Ch. (2010).  Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 1299–1309.

 [30] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: AddisonWesley.

 [31] Cothran, T. (2011). Google scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study. Journal of Library and Information Science Research, 33(4), 293-30.

 [32].Zha, X., Li. J., & Yan, Y. (2013). Understanding the moderating effect of tie on the transfer of ease of use and usefulness from print resources to electronic resources. Journal of Library & Information Science, 6(7), 223-231.

 [33] Shibl, R., Lawley, M., & Debuse, J. (2013). Factors influencing decision support system acceptance. Journal of Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 953-96.

 [34] Wu, J., Tsai, R.J., Chen, C.C, & Wu, Y. (2011). An integrative model to predict the continuance use of electronic learning systems: Hints for teaching. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 1537-2456.

 [35] Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010).  The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159-172.

 [36] Melas, C. D., Zampetakis, L. A., Dimopoulou, A., & Moustakis, V. (2011).  Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: An extended TAM model. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(4), 553-564.    

 [37] Lin, K.M. (2011). E-learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Computers & Education, 56(2), 515-526.

 [38] Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A. & Hezaji, E. (2006). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: AgahPublications. [In Persian].