Crompton P., Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems, English for Specific Purposes, Vol.16, 1997, pp. 271-287.  Hyland K., The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing, Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, Vol.18, 1995, pp.33-42.  Hyland K., Writing without conviction: Hedging in science research articles, Applied Linguistics, Vol.17, 1996, pp.239-256.  Salager-Meyer F., I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse, In Miller T. (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications, Washington, United States Information Agency, 1997, pp.105-118.  Dafouz-Milne E., The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse, Journal of Pragmatica, Vol.40, 2008, pp. 95-113.  Hyland K. and Tse., Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal, Applied Linguistics, Vol.25, 2004, pp.156-177.  Lakoff G., Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts, Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, Vol.8, 1972, pp.183-228.  Silver M., The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse, English for Academic Purposes,Vol. 2, 2003, pp. 359-374.  Falahati R., The use of hedging across different disciplines and rhetorical sections of research articles, Retrieved 28 September 2007, from http://www.sfu.ca/gradlings/NWLC_ proceeding/ flahati 99- 112.html, 2004.  Lin H.C. and Liou M.C., Development of online materials for academic English writing: Contribution of text analysis on the discussion section and hedge use of research articles, Retrieved 23 December 2007, from http://formoosa.fl.nthu.edu.tw/moodle/file.php/1/ progree_ report/_ Lin3- 20- 2006.pdf. 2007.  Vass H., Socio-cognitive aspects of hedging in two legal discourse genres, IBERICA, Vol.7, 2004, pp. 125-141.  Feng H., Research grant proposals in China: A contrastive genre-based study, Working Papers in English and Communication, Vol.16, 2004, pp. 1-32.  Figueiredo-Silva M.I., Teaching academic reading: Some initial findings from a session on hedging, Retrieved 23 December from http: // www.ling.ed. ac. Uk/pgc/ archive/ 2001/ Isabel-Figueiredo-Silva 01. pdf., 2001.  Zarei G.R. and Mansoori S., Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles, The Asian ESP Journal, Vol.3, 2007, pp. 24–40.  Atai M.R. and Sadr L., A cross-cultural genre study on hedging devices in discussion sections of Applied Linguistic research articles, Proceedings of the conference of Pan-Pacific A.R. Jalilifar Journal of Technology of Education/ Vol. 5, No.3, Spring 2011 166 Association of Applied Linguistic, 2006, pp. 42-57.  Jalilifar A.R. and Dadvand S., All the way through the hedges: A corpus analysis of hedges in research articles, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University, Vol.26, 2008, pp. 23-47.  Vassileva I., Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing, English for Specific Purposes, Vol.20, 2001, pp. 83-102.  Hyland K., Hedges, boosters, and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts, Language Awareness, Vol.9, 2000, pp. 179-190.  Wishnoff L.A., Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse, Second Language Studies, Vol.19, 2000, pp. 119-148.  Becher T., Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines, Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1989.  Ruiying Y. and Allison D., Research articles in Applied Linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions, English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 22, 2003, pp.365-385.  Clemen G., Hedging in English journalistic Economics, Retrieved 23 August, 2007 from http: // www. uwasa. fi / comm/ publications/ interkult/ extdoc / 6clemen, 1996.  Quatman T., Sampson K., Robinson c. and Watson C.M., Academic, motivational, and emotional correlates of adolescent dating, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, Vol.127, 2001, pp. 211-234.  Rubin V.L., Linddy E.D. and Kando N., Certainty identification in texts: Categorization model and manual tagging results, Springer Netherlands, Vol.20, 2006, pp. 61-76.  Clifford M.M. and Chou F.C., Effects of payoff task context on academic risk taking, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.83, 1991, pp. 499-507.  Varttala T., Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine, English for Specific Purposes, Vol.18, 1999, pp. 177-200.  Saxon et al.  Hyland K., Patterns of engagement: Dialogic features and L2 undergraduate writing, In Ravelli L.J. and Ellis R.E., Analyzing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks, London, Continuum, 2004, pp.5-23.  Recski L., Interpersonal engagement in academic spoken discourse: A functional account of dissertation defenses, English for Specific Purposes, Vol.24, 2005, pp. 5-23.  Lehman, 1996.  Noor R., Contrastive rhetoric in expository prose: Approaches and achievements, Journal of Pragmatics, Vol.33, 2001, pp. 255-269.  Hyland K., Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles, English for Specific Purposes, Vol.20, 2001, pp. 207- 226.