کنکاشی بر پاسخدهی به بروز کفایت اجتماعی در محیط های یادگیری نوجوانان متاثر از نوع تجربیات طراحی برمبنای نگرش بیوفیلیک

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه معماری،واحد لاهیجان،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی،لاهیجان،ایران

2 استادیار گروه معماری، واحد لاهیجان،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،لاهیجان ،ایران.

چکیده

آنچه از دغدغه های جدی در نظام شهرنشینی معاصر تلقی می گرد، شکاف در حال گسترش بین انسان و نظام های طبیعی است. تراکم شدید ساختمان ها، لمس تکنولوژی به جای لمس طبیعت و بی علاقگی نسبت به دغدغه های زیست محیطی را برای نوجوانان شهرنشین به همراه داشته است که می تواند سطح سلامت روان یک نوجوان را به سبب حضور در مسیر بلوغ دچار بحران جدی نماید. پژوهش حاضر ضمن تبیین الگوهای منطبق بر تجربیات نگرش بیوفیلیک( زیست گرا) به اولویت بندی شاخص های محیطی مرتبط در جهت کسب توانمندی های (شناختی، رفتاری، هیجانی، انگیزشی) دوره نوجوانی در بستر یادگیری می پردازد. روش مورد استفاده بر حسب هدف، کاربردی و شیوه‌ی مطالعه بر حسب ماهیت، توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و پیمایشی می-باشد.گردآوری اطلاعات بر مبنای مطالعه منابع کتابخانه‌ای و در مرحله میدانی از طریق توزیع پرسشنامه و مصاحبه و جهت تحلیل داده ها از نرم افزار spss استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصله، مبین این موضوع است که تجربیات طراحی در بستر یادگیری بر مبنای رویکرد بیوفیلیک به سبب برقراری ارتباط عمیق چندجانبه با طبیعت می تواند پاسخگوی نیازهای روحی و روانی دوره نوجوانی باشند و میان نوع تجربیات محیطی( تجربه مستقیم طبیعت، تجربه غیرمستقیم طبیعت، تجربه فضا و مکان( جهت برقرای تعامل سازگار نوجوان و طبیعت تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد.

چکیده تصویری

کنکاشی بر پاسخدهی به بروز کفایت اجتماعی در محیط های یادگیری نوجوانان متاثر از نوع تجربیات طراحی برمبنای نگرش بیوفیلیک

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An exploration on the responsibility to social adequacy in adolescent learning environments affected by the type of design experience based on the biophilic attitude

نویسندگان [English]

  • fatemeh rajabipour 1
  • mahsa Delshad siahkali 2
1 Master Student of Architecture, Lahijan Unit, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Architecture, Lahijan Unit, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran
چکیده [English]

One of the serious trouble in contemporary urbanization is the growing gap between human and natural systems. the touch of technology instead of touching nature and apathy toward environmental concerns for urban teenagers, which can lead to severe mental health levels of adolescence for inclusion in the maturity path. the present study identifies the patterns in conformity to the biophilic attitude experiences to prioritize the environmental indicators associated with the acquisition of cognitive, behavioral, emotional, motivational and emotional factors in the learning context the method used in terms of objective, practical and method of study in terms of nature, is descriptive and survey. Data collection is based on the study of library resources and in the field stage through questionnaire and interviews and using spss software used to analyze data. the results indicate that the design experiences in the context of learning based on biophilic approach can satisfy the spiritual and psychological needs of adolescence and there is a significant difference between the types of environmental experiences (direct experience of nature, the indirect experience of nature, and the experience of space and place) in order to establish a consistent interaction between adolescents and nature.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biophilic
  • Bio-orienting
  • Teens Learning environments
  • Social adequacy

[1] Moran ,Emilo F, (2006) ,people and Nature: An introductionto Human Ecological  Relation,Blackwell,malden,MA,232PP.

 

[2] Moss, S. (2012). Natural childhood. London: The National Trust Publications .

 

[3] Bradley, G. L., & Inglis, B. C. (2012). Adolescent leisure dimensions, psychosocial adjustment, and gender effects, Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1167- 1176.

 

[4] Sepehrmanesh Z, Ahmadvand A, Yavari P, Saeiy R. Kashan ,(2008),school adolescents'' mental health. IranianJournal of Epidemiology; 4(2): 43-9. [in Persian] 

 

[5] Hizomi, Haleh, AllahVerdipour, Hamid, Safaian, Abdul Rasool (2016), Stress and Predicting Factors of  Psychological Well-being among Adolescents , Monthly Journal of Yazd School of Public Health, 15 (3), 78-91.[in Persian]

 

[6] Turpie, J.K., 2003. The existing value of biodiversityin South Africa: how interest,experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of threat influence localwillingness to pay. Ecol. Econom. 46, 199–216.

 

[7] Collado, S., Corraliza, J.A., (2013). Children’srestorative experiences and selfreportedenvironmental behaviors. Environ. Behav. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0013916513492417.

 

[8] Bowler, D., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). The importance of nature for health: Is there a specific benefit of contact with green space? Collaboration for environmental evidence. Bangor University.

 

[9] Kellert SR, Heerwagen J, Mador M (2008) Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

 

[10] Ajzen, I., (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Org. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211.

 

[11] Stokes, D.L., (2006). Conservators of experience. BioScience 56, 7–8.

 

[12]Zhang, W., Goodale, E., Chen,J.,(2014), How contact with nature affects childrens biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China, Journal of Biological Conservation ,177 , 109–116.

 

[13] Ulrich RS (1979) Visual landscapes and psychological wellbeing (National Parks). Landsc Res 4: 17-23.

 

[14] Söderlund Jana and Newman Peter, Biophilic architecture: a review of the rationale and outcomes, (2015),AIMS Environmental Science, 2(4): 950-969.

 

[15] van den Berg, A.E., S.L. Koole, & N.Y. van der Wulp (2003). Environmental Preference and Restoration: (How) Are They Related? Journal ofEnvironmental Psychology, 23, 135-146.

 

[16] Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S (2008) The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature. Psychol Sci 19(12): 1207-1212.

 

[17] Tyrväinen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, et al. (2014) The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures:Afield experiment. J Environ Psychol 38: 1-9.  

 

[18] Berto R (2005) Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. J Environ Psychol 25(3): 249-259.

 

[19] Kellert SR, Calabrese EF, (2015),The Practice of Biophilic Design. Available from: http://www.biophilic-design.com/ 

http://www.bullfrogfilms.com/guides/biodguide.pdf

 

[20] Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001) Environment and crime in the inner city - Does vegetation reduce crime? Environ Behav33: 343-367.

 

[21]  Greenwood .Alison, Gatersleben .Birgitta,2016, Let''s go outside! Environmental restoration amongst adolescents and the impact of friends and phones,Journal of Environmental Psychology 48 , 131-139.

 

[22] Bezold. Carla P, Banay. Rachel F, Coull. Brent A, Hart .Jaime E, Peter James , Kubzansky. Laura D, Missmer . Stacey A and Laden Francine, (2017),The Association Between Natural Environments and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents Living in the United States, Journal of Adolescent Health.

 

[23] Ahadi, Hassan, jamhari, Farhad (2010), Psychology of adolescence, adulthood (youth, middle aged and aging), Qom, bright future.[in Persian]                                                                                                                                             

[24] Safari M, Ghofranipour F, Mahmoudi M, Montazeri A. Stress, Coping Strategies and Related Factors in a Sample of Iranian Adolescents. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal (2011); 13(9): 641-6.

 

[25] Seymour-Cullman, Margaret (2016), the Social adequacy of children and adolescents. Saeed Rezaei, Tehran, Avaya Noor Publications. [in Persian]                                                                                

 

[26] Flener,R.D.& Lease,A.M.(1990).social work and the human sernices, Chicago:Nelson-hall.pp.1-17.                          

 

[27] Yarahmadyan N,Improving individual social abilities and general health of adolescents through enhancement of social competence,(2012),Journal of Behavioral sciences,6,(3),279-288. [in Persian]

 

[28] Botvin GJ, Griffin KW. Life skills Training as and another problem behaviors.Lnt J Emerg Ment health.(2002);4(1):41-7.

 

[29] kangas, Marjaana, 2010,Finnish childrens views on the ideal school and learning environment, learning Environ Res,13,205,223.

 

[30]Shuhana,shamsuddin,hanim,bahauddin,norsiah abd,aziz, (2012), Relationship between the outdoor physical Environment and students social Behavior in urban secondry school , procedia-social and Behavioral sciences 50-148-160.

 

[31] kasali,Altug , Dogan,Fehmi, (2010)  fifth-sixth- and seventh – grade students use of non –classroom spaces during recess : the case of three private schools in Izmir , Turkey ,Journal of Enviromental psychology ,30(4),518-532.

 

[32] Mozaffar, Farhang, Mehdizadeh Seraj, Fatemeh, Mirmoradi, Seyedeh Somayeh (2009), Recognition of Nature''s Role in Educational Spaces, Journal of Educational Technology, 4 (1), 37-46.[in Persian]

 

[33] Mozaffar, Farhang, Mirmoradi, Seyedeh Somayeh (2014), A Study of the Common Patterns of Iranian Schools Based on the Principles of relationship between Classroom and Exterior, Architecture and Urban Planning Arman Shahr, 13: 105-93. [in Persian]

 

[34] Horstman, Eric. 2008. The Shape of Learning. United States: SP&M.

 

[35] Meyer, Kirk, (2010), The Outdoor Classroom: A Jewel in the Crown of Public Education. Minneapolis: DesignShare.

 

[36] Ma¨kinen,kirisi, Tyrva¨inen,Liisa,(2008),Teenage experiences of public green spaces in suburban Helsinki , Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7, 277–289.

 

[37]  Delshad, Mahsa, Bemanian, Mohammad Reza, Mahdavi Nejad, Mohammad Jawad (2018), Analysis the role of the environmental interoperability capacity in  interstitial spaces to formation the collective spatial system of urban schools affected by the type of organization, system, Urban Management Quarterly, (50), 413-433.[in Persian]

 

[38] Cherney, I.D.; London, K. (2006),Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, andoutdoor activities for 5- to 13-year-old children. Sex Roles, 54, 717–726.

 

[39] Oxford Advanced Learner›s Dictionary, 2010.                                                                                                            

[40]http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Psychology

 

[41] Aref, Zahra, Taheri, Jafar (2016), Interactive child-nature environments based on Biophilic design approach , 2nd International Congress of new Horizons in Architectur and Urban with Technological Development Approach, Tehran, Tarbiat Modares University, Ferdowsi University.[in Persian]   

 

[42] Ryan CO, Browning WO, Clancy JO, et al. (2014) Biophillic design patterns: Emerging nature-based parameters for health and wellbeing in the built environment. ArchNet Int J Architect Res 8: 62-76.

 

[43] Browning WD, Ryan CO, Clancy JO (2014) 14 Patterns of biophilic design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green LLC.

 

[44] Nazemi, Elham, Ghasemi , Elaheh, (2016), explaining solutions to promote consistent interactions between architectural and natural monuments with the approach of biophilic architecture, the Biennial conference of community and contemporary architecture, Isfahan, the Architectural and Urban Development Institute of the Amiraran-e Mehrzai.[in Persian] 

 

[45] Burns G (2005) Chapter 16: Naturally happy, naturally healthy: The role of the environment in wellbeing. In: Huppert FA, Baylis N, Keverne B, editors. The Science of Wellbeing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 405-434.

 

[46] Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H. (2010) Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change, Island Press, Washington DC.

 

[47] Biederman, I. & E. Vessel (2006). Perceptual Pleasure & the Brain. American Scientist, 94(1), 249-255.

 

[48] Salingaros, N. A. (2012). Fractal Art and Architecture Reduce Physiological Stress. Journal of Biourbanism, 2, 11-28.

 

[49] Alvarsson, J., S. Wiens & M. Nilsson (2010). Stress Recovery during Exposure to Nature Sound and Environmental Noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7 (3), 1036-1046.

 

[50] Lichtenfeld, S., A.J. Elliot, M.A. Maier, & R. Pekrun (2012). Fertile Green: Green Facilitates Creative Performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 (6), 784-797.

 

[51] Guéguen N, Stefan J (2014) “Green Altruism”: Short Immersion in Natural Green Environments and Helping Behavior. Environ Behav 2014: 1-19.

 

[52] Mehta, R., R. Zhu, & A. Cheema (2012). Is Noise Always Bad? Exploring the Effects of Ambient Noise on Creative Cognition. Journal of Consumer Research 39(4), 784-799.  

 

[53] Clearwater, Y.A., & R.G. Coss (1991). Functional Esthetics to Enhance Wellbeing. In Harrison, Clearwater & McKay (Eds.). From Antarctica to Outer Space. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp410.

 

[54] Petherick, N. (2000). Environmental Design and Fear: The Prospect-Refuge Model and the University College of the CaribooCampus. WesternGeography,10(1),89-112. 

 

[55] Wang, K. & R.B. Taylor (2006). Simulated Walks through Dangerous Alleys: Impacts of Features and Progress on Fear. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 269-283.

 

[56] Kellert SR (2008) Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In: Kellert SR, Heerwagen J, Mador ML, editors. Biophilic Design. New Jersey, US: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 3-19.