شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی موانع اثربخشی آموزش الکترونیکی کارکنان(مطالعه موردی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کردستان)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس آموزش/دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کردستان

2 عضو هیات علمی

3 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه بوعلی همدان

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر باهدف شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی موانع اثربخشی آموزش الکترونیکی ضمن خدمت کارکنان انجام‌گرفته است. جامعه آماری متشکل از مدیران، اساتید دانشگاهی و متخصصین در حوزه‌های موردمطالعه پژوهش بودند که تعداد 29 نفر با استفاده از روش قضاوتی انتخاب گردیدند برای پاسخگویی به سؤالات پژوهش ابتدا با استفاده از مطالعه کتابخانه‌ای و روش مصاحبه، به جمع‌آوری اطلاعات پرداخته شد که نتیجه آن شناسایی 32 عامل بود. در ادامه جهت تأیید و اتفاق‌نظر کارشناسان بر روی موانع شناسایی‌شده از روش دلفی استفاده گردید. در طی سه مرحله استفاده از روش دلفی نهایتاً به 25 عامل (مانع) در قالب شش مانع اصلی تعدیل گردید. پس‌ازاینکه در مرحله سوم اتفاق‌نظر نهایی از طریق معیار ضریب کندال به میزان 78% محرز گردید، با استفاده از آزمون فریدمن عوامل رتبه‌بندی شد که در این رتبه‌بندی موانع مرتبط با فراگیر در رتبه نخست و عوامل زیرساختی، عمومی، محتوای آموزشی، عوامل مرتبط با مدرس و عوامل سازمانی به ترتیب در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار گرفتند در ادامه زیر عامل‌های هرکدام از موانع یادشده هم بررسی و رتبه‌بندی گردیدند.

چکیده تصویری

شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی موانع اثربخشی آموزش الکترونیکی کارکنان(مطالعه موردی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کردستان)

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and ranking the barriers to effectiveness of E-learning In-service Training (case study kurdistan university of medical sciences)

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohamadsharif mohamadi 1
  • Roholah Sohrabi 2
  • farhad seraji 3
1 Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
2 Department of Accunting, Bu Ali Sina University
3 Department of Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan
چکیده [English]

This paper aims to identify barriers to the effectiveness of the e-learning in-service training. The population is managers, university professor, and specialists involved in the field, from which 29 people were chosen using judgmental sampling. To answer the questions of this research, first, data collection was done through library study and interviewed, which resulted in identifying 32 factors. Then in order to come to an acceptable set of factors we used Delphi method. After three times of using Delphi technique, we came to 25 factors (obstacles) under 6 main categories. After approving the factors by Kendall coefficient (78%), the factors were ranked using Friedman test, which according to the ranking, factors related to the learner were ranked first, and infrastructure factors, general factors, educational content, factors related to the teacher and organizational factors were ranked after the first factor. Finally the Subsets of these factors were evaluated and ranked.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • ''Training''
  • In-service training''
  • ''E-learning In-Service Training''
  • ''Barriers to effectiveness''؛ ''delphi''

 [1] Bakhshandeh, H., Ahmadi, H., Behnam, M., & Hamidi, M. (2013). evaluate the effectiveness of coaching courses and from the perspective of students on the basis of the Kirkpatrick model. Exercise management (movement) Journal, 5(4), 161-178. [InPersian]

 

[2] Naderi, N., Rajaei Pour, S., & Jamshidian, A. (2007). Concepts and strategies for staff empowerment. Journal of Tadbir, 18 (186),65-67. [in Persian]

 

[3] Fathi Vajargah, K. (2005). In-service education planning. Tehran: Samt. [in Persian]

 

[4] Abtahi, S. H. (2004). Training and human resource development. Tehran: Industrial development and renovation organization of iran publications. [in Persian]

 

[5] Delavar, S., & Ghorbani, M. (2012). The role of virtual training on the students creative learning in universities of bojnourd, northeast iran. interdisciplinary journal of virtual learning in medical sciences (IJVLMS), 2(3), 17-27. [in Persian]

 

 [6] Hosainzadehshari, M., & Zanganehnejad, N. (2013). evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning systems,  journal of human resource management researches, 5(1), 173-196. [in Persian]

 

 [7] Abbasian, A., salami, GH., & Azin, R. (2008). Quality evaluation of engineering education: a case study on the effectiveness of the resistance booster training course based on the kirk patrick model. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education 10(39),37-62. [in Persian]

 

[8] Nejabi, A., & Zibaei, M. (2002). New model of knowledge transfer, journal of tadbir, 13(129), 28-33. [in Persian]

 

[9] Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.

 

 [10] Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75-86

 

[11] Doherty, W. (2006). An analysis of multiple factors affecting retention in Web-based community college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4): 245-255

 

 [12] Nasiri, A. (2004).Management of virtual universities and e-learning centers , Tehran: university,faculty of Management publication. [in Persian]

 

 [13] Toprakci, E. (2006). Obstacles at integration of schools into information and communication technologies by taking into consideration the opinions of the teachers and principals of primary and secondary schools in Turkey. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST), 9(1), 1-16

 

 [14] Wentz, M. (2003). Learning Effectiveness from a Student’s Perspective. Retrieved fromwww2. uwstout. edu/content/bpa/ir/laptop/learning. pdf.

 

 [15] Ebadi, R. (2004). Information technology and education. Tehran: Aftab Mehr. [in Persian]

 

[16] Seraji, F., Ataran, M., & Ali, A. M. (2009). A Study of characteristics of curriculum design in iranian virtual universities and its comparison with the model of virtual university curriculum development. [in Persian]

 

[17] Khorasani, A, Mehdi, R. (2007). A guide for designing and managing employees’ training systems in manufacturing and service institutions, tehran: aryapazhooh publication. [in Persian]

 

[18] Welsh, E.T., Wanberg, C.R., Brown, K.G., Simmering, M.J. (2003). E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7 (4), 245-259

 

[19] Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.

 

[20] Negash S. et al. (2008). Handbook of distance learning for real-time and asynchronous information technology education. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

 

[21] O'Donoghue, J., Singh, G., & Green, C. (2004). A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of IT based education and the implication upon students. Digital Education Review, (9), 63-76

 

[22] Bagheri Majd, R., Shahi, S., & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2013). Challenges of electronic training development in higher education system of shahid chamran university of ahwaz. training development magazine in medical science, period, 6(12),1-13. [in Persian]

 

[23] Alavi S., & Shariati M. (2010). Investigating employees satisfaction with e-learning courses in tehran university of medical sciences. iranian journal of medical education. 10 (3),200-210. [in Persian]

 

[24] Jafarifar, Z. Khorasani, A. Rezaeizadeh, M. (2017). Identifying and ranking barriers of instructors in virtual training and human resource development (Case Study: Shahid Beheshti University) Quarterly. Journal of Training & Development of Human Resources, 4(12), 53-77. [in Persian]

 

[25] Siengthai S.,Boonkrob D. And Siengthai M.(2016). Evaluation of training effectiveness: a case study of the ministry of interior, thailand”. comprehensive research. journal of management and business studies, 1(1), 007 – 014

 

[26] Leavy, P. (2008). Performance-based emergent methods. Handbook of emergent methods, 343-357.

 

[27] Grady, M. P. (1998). Qualitative and action research: A practitioner handbook. Phi Delta Kappa International.

 

[28] Khorasani, A., & Dosti, H. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of organizational learning (Operating Instructions). Tehran: publisher Iran Training Center and Industrial research. [in Persian]

 

[29] Fareghzadeh, N., & Kashi, A. (2014). An Evaluation of virtual education methods and tools to improve teaching quality from the point of view of the faculty members of islamic azad university of khodabandeh. [in Persian]

 

 [30] Mohamadi, A., & Ghorbanzadeh moghadam, S.(2004). A Survey on how teachers are attentive to innovation in the teaching and use of learning tools. second conference on educational technology. [in Persian]

 

 [31] Enayati,T., Zameni, F., & Zanganeh, M. J. (2011). Identifying major barriers of application of informational technology in Aliabad katul high schools. [in Persian]