Impact use of education model based on mobile learning environments  on Social peresence and teaching  peresence for intellectual schools students in mathematical lesson

Mosa Ramezani, S.; Zaraii Zavaraki, E.; Nili, M.R.; Delavar, A.; Farajollahi, M.

doi:10.22061/jte.2018.3670.1916

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University.Tehran, Iran

² Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, payame noor university. Tehran, Iran

³ Associate Professor , Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences ,payame noor university, Tehran.Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.3670.1916

Abstract

Background and Objective:Mobile learning is a subset of e-learning and focuses on the use of portable learning tools. This method of learning allows learning regardless of time and place. In learning, students are able to learn from a variety of sources around the world. This enrichment leads to effective and meaningful learning. In addition, learners in this environment can change their learning environment and use a variety of learning experiences. The role of social (communication) and managerial processes (teaching and classroom skills) is also important in this regard. The purpose of this research is Impact use of education model based on mobile learning environments on Social peresence and teaching peresence for Smart schools students in mathematical lesson.
Methods: in this research goal, a mixed methods research was used. In this research we used quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design with control group. Research statistical population included all girl students studying in Tehran Smart schools. In order to select the sample size using multi-stage cluster sampling method from among smart schools in Tehran, one school was selected and finally 15 people were in the experimental group and 15 people in the control group. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to test the first and second hypotheses of the study.
Findings: The results showed that the application of this model was effective on all dimensions of social presence and teaching presence in the experimental group compared to the control group (in the post-test).
Conclusion:. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of the application of mobile learning model based on social presence and attendance of smart school learners in mathematics. The results of the analysis of research data indicate that the application of mobile learning model has a positive effect on social presence and the presence of smart school students teaching in mathematics. Students in the mobile learning management system scored higher than the other group trained in the traditional environment. This indicates the effectiveness of the environment designed for mobile learning in terms of social presence and teaching.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20080441.1398.13.4.20.7

Main Subjects

Mobile learning

COPYRIGHTS
©2019 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

References

[1] Yosefi F, KamranZadeh S. (2015). Study of Effective factors on improving the quality of learning environments in primary school. Journal of Engineering Organization report.86: 61-53.Persian.

[2] Banisi P. (2013). Training from traditional to virtual. Persian.

[3] Nozari D. Noriyan M. Elementay school curriculum. Tehran: Islamic Azad University Tehran South Branch; 2003. Persian.

[4] Mellow P. The media generation: maximize learning by getting mobile; 2005.

[5] Safarzadeh M, Manochehri K. Learning through mobile devices. Paper presented in the 2^nd International e-municipality Conference. (April15-16). Tehran: Ministry of the Interrior. Organization of municipalities of the country; 2009. Persian.

[6] Abdollahi M. Mobile learning and its role in future e-learning. Paper presented in the 2^nd e-learning Conference. Zahedan: Sistan and Balochestan; 2007. Persian.

[7] Attaran M. Futuristic curriculum Tomorrow’s school Monthly. 2009; 5(6). Persian.

[8] Keengwe J, Bhargava M. Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Educational Information Technology. 2014; 19: 737-746.

[9] Barak M, Harward J, Lerman S. Studio-based learning via wireless notebooks: a case of a Java programming course. International Journal Mobile Learning and Organisation. 2007; 1(1): 15-29.

[10]Garrison RD, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Unpublished manuscript; 2000

[11] Zaraii Zavaraki E, Ramezani S, Velayati E [Translation of Innovative Mobile Learning: Techniques and Technologies] Rue HK, Parsons D. (Authors). Tehran: Donyaye Eghtesad Publisher; 2018. Persian.

[12] Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education. 2005; 19(3): 148-133.

[13] Garrison ADR. Communities of inquiry in online learning: Social, teaching and cognitive presence. In C. Howard et al. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of distance and online learning (p. 352). Hershey, PA: IGI Globa; 2009.

[14] Garrison DR, Arbaugh JB. Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education. 2007; 10(8): 157-172.

[15] Ruhlandt RR. Differences in retention, social presence, cognitive presence and teaching presence in fully online and blended courses. [doctoral dissertation],Regent University; 2010.

[16] Zamani BBE, Nikonezhad S. Comparison of the interaction and social peresence of virtual and non virtual learners in terms of demographic factors and academic success. Applied sociology. 2014; 55: 119-134. Persian.

[17] Ogara SO, Chang E, Koh CE, Prybutok VR. Investigating factors affecting social presence and user satisfaction with Mobile Instant Messaging. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014; 36: 453-459.

[18] Rockinson AJ. The impact of asynchronous and synchronous instruction and discussion cognitive presence, social presence, teaching presence and learning [doctoral dissertation], Regent Universit; 2009.

[19] Salloum SR. Student perception of computer-mediated communication tools in online learning: helpfulness and effects on teaching, social and cognitive presence. [doctoral Dissertation], University of North Carolina; 2010.

[20] Stead G,Sharpe, B, Anderson P, Philpott M. Emerging Technology for learning Coventry. UK. Becta; 2006.

[21] Raeisdana F [Translation of world of learning at the school] Keys JP (Author). Tehran: Research Institute of Education; 1997. Persian.

[22] Churchill D, Lu J, Chiu TKF, Fox B (Eds). Mobile Learning Design. Theories and Application. Singapore: Springer.

[23] Garrison DR. E-LearniEng in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for research and practice. UK: Routledg; 2017.

[24] Yodkamlue B. Online texts of non-native speakers in an L2 electronic discussion forum: An analysis of social presence and cognitivr presence. [doctoral dissertation] University of South Carolina; 2008.

[25] Katernyak I, Ekman S, Ekman A, Sheremet M, Loboda V. e-learning: From social presence to co-creation in virtual education community. Interactive Technology & Smart Education. 2009; 6(4): 215-222.

[26] Alaulamie LA. Teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence as predictors of students’ satisfaction in an online program at a Saudi university. [doctoral dissertation], Ohio University.and contiguity.

[27] Thomas RA, West RE, Borup J. An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. Internet and Higher Education. 2017; 33: 61-73.

[28] Rockinson-Szapkiw AJ. The Impact of Asyncronous and Ssyncronous Instruction and Discussion On Cognitive Presence, Social, Presence, Teaching Presence, and learning. [doctoral dissertation] US: Regent University; 2009.

[29] Hewitt J. How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2003;28(1): 31-45.

[30] Bangert A. The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2008; 20(1): 34-61.

[31] Kozan K, Richardson JC. Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Internet and Higher Education. 2014; 21: 68-73.