فصلنامه علمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 رشته‌ی فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت،دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در حال حاضر تکنولوژی دیجیتال، با تسهیل ارتباطات و تعاملات، به معلمان کمک کرده است تا از انزوای حرفه‌ای خلاصی یابند. در دنیای دانش­محور کنونی، معلمان به عنوان یادگیرندگان، در جستجوی منابع فهم و دانش به منظور اثربخش‌تر نمودن تدریس خود و در نتیجه بهبود یادگیری دانش‌آموزان، در اجتماعات یادگیری حرفه‌ای، حضور می‌یابند. در حقیقت، اجتماعات یادگیری حرفه‌ای، به منزله­ی بستری برای رشد و بالندگی حرفه‌ای معلمان، متجلی شده است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، کشف دستاوردهایی است که حضور در اجتماعات یادگیری برای معلمان به ارمغان می‌آورد. نگارندگان با استفاده از روش سنتزپژوهشی، به تلفیق پیشینه­ی پژوهشی در این زمینه دست زده­اند. یافته‌ها حکایت از آن دارد که شرکت در اجتماعات یادگیری پیامدهای ارزنده‌ای را برای معلمان به همراه داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Digital turn and its implications on teacher’s professional achievement: learning communities formation among teachers

نویسندگان [English]

  • F. Gandomi 1
  • S.M. Sajjadi 2

1 Department of curriculum studies, tarbiat modares university. Tehran. Iran

2 philosophy of education, department of education, Tarbiat modares university. Tehran. Iran

چکیده [English]

Nowadays, digital technology has reduced teachers’ professional isolation by facilitating communications and interactions. In the modern knowledge-based world, teachers as learners participate in professional learning communities to seek knowledge resources for more effective teaching and consequently the improvement of their students’ learning. In fact, professional learning communities are as context for teachers’ professional development. The goal of this research is discovering achievements that teachers achieve by participating in learning communities. Method of Research is the literature review.  Results show that teachers’ participation in learning communities leads to valuable achievements for them.    

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Professional learning communities
  • collegial dialogue
  • professional development
  • digital technology
[1]
[2]
McLaughlin. M. W., and Talbert, J. E., Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: strategic opportunities for meeting the nation’s education goals. Palo Alto. CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary Schools, (1993).
[3]
Hord, Shirley M., Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Southwest educational development laboratory, (1997).
[4]
Won Hur, Jung. And brush, Thomas A., Teacher participation in online communities: why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online, communities of k-12 teachers? JRTE, Vol. 41, No. 3, (2009), pp. 279-303.
[5]
Clarke, Linda. The POD model: Using communities of practice theory to conceptualize student teachers’ professional learning online, Computers and education, Vol. 52, (2009), pp. 521–529.
[6]
Tillema, Harm. , Orland-Barak, Lily. Constructing knowledge in professional conversations: The role of beliefs on knowledge and knowing.  Learning and Instruction, Vol. 16, (2006), pp. 592-608.
[7]
Zhao, Y. Zhang, G., Lai, c., Curriculum, Digital Resources and Delivery, international encyclopedia of education, third edition, Vol. 1, (2010), pp. 390-396.
[8]
Poulin, Michael T., Social Networking Tools and Teacher Education Learning Communities: A Case Study, (doctoral dissertation), North central University. (2014), Retrieved from prequest.
[9]
Nechita, Lena. , timofti, lulia-cristina., Increasing independence versus increasing collaboration with ICT support. The 2nd international conference on education and educational psychology. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, Vol. 29, (2011), pp. 1508-1517.  
 
[10]
Torraco, Richard J., Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, (2005), pp. 356-367.
[11]
Ong, C.-S., Lai, J.-Y., and Wang, Y.-S., Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, Vol. 41, No. 6, (2004), pp.795-804.
[12]
Jarvis, Peter., Adult Education and Lifelong Learning: Theory and practice, (2004), Routledge.
[13]
Mbatha, Blessing, Global Transition in Higher Education: From the Traditional Model of Learning to a New Socially Mediated Model, The international review of research in open and distance learning, Vol. 15, No. 3, (2014), pp. 257-274.
[14]
Top, Ercan, Blogging as a social medium in undergraduate courses:  Sense of community best predictor of perceived learning, internet and higher education. Vol. 15, (2012), pp. 24-28.
[15]
Kamel Boulos, M. N., Maramba, I. and Wheeler, S., Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, Vol. 6, No. 41, (2006).
[16]
Poulin, Michael T. Social Networking Tools and Teacher Education Learning Communities: A Case Study (doctoral dissertation), north central University. (2014), Retrieved from prequest.
[17]
Zhao, Y. Zhang, G. and Lai, C.  Curriculum, Digital Resources and Delivery, international encyclopedia of education, THIRD EDITION, Vol. 1, (2010), pp. 390-396.
[18]
Lim, Cher ping, and lee, john chi-kin., Teaching e-portfolios and the development of professional learning communities (plcs) in higher education institutions. Internet and higher education. Vol. 20, (2014), pp. 57-59.
[19]
Tang, E. and Lam, C., Building an effective online learning community (olc) in blog-based teaching portfolio. The internet and higher education. Vol. 20, (2014), pp. 79-85
[20]
Hadar, linor., and Brody, David., from isolation to symphonic harmony: building a professional development community among teacher educators. Teaching and teacher education, Vol. 26, (2010), pp.1641-1651.
[21]
Barnett, M., Issues and trends concerning electronic networking technologies for teacher professional development: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, (2001), New Orleans, June.
[22]
Won hur, jung., and  brush, Thomas A., Teacher participation in online communities: why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of k-12 teachers?. JRTE, Vol. 41,No. 3, (2009), pp. 279-303
[23]
Tough, A., Learning without a teacher. Educational Research Series, Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. (1967).
[24]
Merriam, S. B., Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult, learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, Vol. 2001, No. 89, (2001), pp. 3-14.
[25]
Knowles, m., Self-directed learning. New York: association press. (1975).
[26]
Stephen D. Brookfield, Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher, Jossey-Bass, (1995).
[27]
Garrison, D. R., Critical Thinking and Self-Directed Learning in Adult Education: An Analysis of Responsibility and Control Issues, Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 3, (1992), pp.136-148.
[28]
Candy, P C, Self-direction for Lifelong Learning. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California. (1991).
[29]
Lew, Chulsub, The professional learning community: The self-directed learning of teachers and the practices of professional community (doctoral dissertation), San Marcos, Texas State University, (2006).
[30]
Lave, J., and Wenger, E., Situated learning, legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1991).
[31]
Hadar, linor., and Brody, David, from isolation to symphonic harmony: building a professional development community among teacher educators. Teaching and teacher education, Vol. 26. (2010), pp. 1641-1651.
[32]
Palloff, R; Pratt, K., Building online learning communities: effective strategies for the virtual classroom. Ans Francisco: jossey-bass. (2007).
[33]
Bielaczyc, K. and Collins, A., Learning communities in classrooms: advancing knowledge for a lifetime. NASSP Bulletin, Vol. 83, No. 604, (1991), pp. 4-10
[34]
Barab. Sasha A., kling, Rob., And gray, Hames H., designing virtual communities in the service of learning. The press syndicate of the University of Cambridge. (2004).
[35]
Jones, A. and Preece, J., Online communities for teachers and lifelong learners: A framework for comparing similarities and identifying differences in communities of practice and communities of interest. International Journal of Learning Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2–3, (2006), pp. 112–137.
[36]
General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland, Teaching: The reflective profession. Belfast: GTCNI, (2007).
[37]
Mcloghlin, c., lee, M. J., and Brady, J., A learning architecture framework (LAF) for developing community, engagement and professional identity for pre-service teachers. Emerging technologies conference. University of Wollongong, (2008).
[38]
Wenger, Etienne, Communities of practice a brief introduction, 2006, available at www.ewenger.com/research
[39]
Hodkinson, p., Informal Learning: A Contested Concept, international encyclopedia of education, third edition, Vol. 1, (2010), pp. 42-46
[40]
Mills, Kathy Ann., A Review of the ''Digital Turn'' in the New Literacy Studies, Review of educational research, Vol. 80, No. 2, (2010), pp. 246–271
[41]
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P., Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, Vol. 18, No. 1, (1989),  pp. 32-42
[42]
Putnam, Ralph T., and  Borko, Hilda., What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning?  Educational Researcher, Vol. 29, No. 1,  (2000), pp. 4-15
[43]
Davis, B. and Sumara, D., Curriculum and Constructivism, international Encyclopedia of education – third edition, Vol. 1, (2010), pp. 488-493
[44]
Lee, Sangmin-Michelle., The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 21, (2014), pp. 41–52.
[45]
Prestridge, Sarah, ICT professional development for teachers in online forums: Analyzing the role of discussion, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 26, (2010), pp. 252–258.
[46]
Jackson, G.B., Methods for integrative reviews. Review of educational research, Vol. 50, (1980), pp. 438-460.
[47]
Creswell, J., Educational research: Planning conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc, (2012).
[48]
Webster, Jan; Watson, Richard T., Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review, MIS Quarterly; Vol. 26, No. 2, (2002).
[49]
Dewey, John., how we think. D.C. Heath & Company, (1910).
[50]
Mezirow, J., Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,(1990).
[51]
Rivers,  Bethany, A. , Richardson, John T. E., and Price, Linda., Promoting Reflection in Asynchronous Virtual Learning Spaces: Tertiary Distance Tutors’ Conceptions, The international review of research in open and distance learning, V     ol. 15, No. 3 , (2014), pp. 215-231
[52]
Heirbacher, Sandy., Dialogue and Deliberation as the Basis for Sustainable Decision Making, 2007, revised from , www.intellitics.com
[53]
Top, Erca., Blogging as a social medium in undergraduate courses: Sense of community best predictor of perceived learning, internet and higher education. Vol. 15, (2012), pp. 24-28
[54]
Vandeyar, Thirusellvan., Practice as policy in ICT for education: Catalysing communities of practice in education in South Africa, Technology in Society, Vol. 35, (2013), pp. 248–257
[55]
Daugherty, T., Lee, W.-N., Gangadharbatla, H., Kim, K., and Outhavong, S., Organizational virtual communities: Exploring motivations behind online panel participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 10, No. 4, (2005).
[56]
Hew, K.F., & Hara, N., Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 55, No. 6, (2007), pp. 573–595
[57]
Ryymin, essi; palonen, tuire., And hakkarainen, kai., Networking relations of using ICT within a teacher community. Computers and education, Vol. 51, (2008), pp. 1264-1282.
[58]
Bolam, ray; Stoll, louse; Greenwood, Angela., The involvement of support staff in professional learning communities. In Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas, Stoll, Louise; Louis, Karen Seashore. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), (2007).
[59]
Zohar, Danah; Marshall, Ian. , Spiritual capital. Berrett-koehler publisher, Inc., 2004).
[60]
Lee, Sangmin-Michelle., The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 21, (2014), pp. 41–52.
[61]
Espinoza, E. L., Change: how the learning of teachers alters while implementing an Educational mandate, (2006).
[62]
Lee, j.c., zhang, Z., and Yin, H.,  A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to student. Teaching and teacher education, Vol. 27, No. 5, (2011), pp. 820-830
[63]
Colvin, J., Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring, Vol. 15, No. 2, (2007), pp. 165-181
[64]
Desimone, laura M., Hochberg, Eric D., Porter, Andrew C., Polikoff, Morgan S., Schwartz, Robert., and  Johnson, L. joy, Formal and informal mentoring: complementary, compensatory, or consistent? Teacher education. Vol. 65, No. 2, (2014), pp. 88-110
[65]
Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S., Communities for teacher research: Fringe or forefront? In M.W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman. (Eds.), Teacher learning: new, (1996).
[66]
Clarke, Douglas. Transition of New Teachers in a Learning Community (doctoral Dissertation). Concordia University – Chicago, (2015).
[67]
Chi Lai, Yiu., And M.W. Ng, Eugenia, Using wikis to develop student teachers' learning, teaching, and assessment capabilities, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 14, (2011), pp. 15–26.
[68]
Wheeler, Steve. , and Wheeler, Dawn, Using wikis to promote quality learning in teacher training. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 34, No. 1,(2009), pp.1-10
[69]
Mehrmohammadi, Mahmoud., monthly journal of composition and writing, No. 59, (1394), [in Persian]
[70]
Anderson, T., Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in education. Edmonton: AU Press, (2010).
[71]
Wang, zhijun., chen, li., and Anderson, terry. a framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The international review of research in open and distance learning. (2014).
[72]
Sai, Xiao, Siraj, Saedah. Professional learning community in education: literature review, The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education. Vol.  2, No. 2, (2015), pp. 43-56
[73]
Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, (1989), pp .1-6
[74]
Sadykova, Gulnara., Mediating Knowledge through Peer-to-Peer Interaction in a Multicultural Online Learning Environment: A Case Study of International Students in the US, the international review of research in open and distance learning,. Vol 15, No. 3, (2014).
[75]
McLoughlin, C., and Lee, MJW. ,   Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings ascilite Singapore , (2007), pp. 664-675.
[76]
Luck, Lee Tan., Hashim, Filouz. , Zarina, Syaidatul. , and Din, Mat., Creative and Literary Writing Digital LMS in Supporting Writers’ Group Learning and Knowledge Sharing among Creative Writers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 67, (2012), pp. 238 – 249.
[77]
Lassonde, Cynthia A; Israel Susan E., Teacher collaboration for professional learning: facilitating study, research, and inquiry communities, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, (2010).
[78]
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L., Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.(1993).
[79]
Swan, Karen. & Ice, Phil., The Community of Inquiry framework ten years later: introduction to the special issue. Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 1-2, (2010), pp.1-4.
[80]
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and archer, W., Critical inquiry environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education. Vol. 2, No. 2-3, (2000), pp. 87-105.
[81]
Shea, Peter., Hayes, Suzanne., Smith, Sedef Uzuner., Vickers, Jason., Bidjerano, Temi., Gozza-Cohen, Mary.,
 ian, Shou-Bang., Pickett, Alexandra., Wilde, Jane., and Tseng, Chi-Hua., Online learner self-regulation: Learning presence viewed through quantitative content-and social network analysis, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Vol. 14, No. 3, (2013), pp. 427-461.
[82]
National council of teachers of English, teacher learning community, a policy research brief produces by the national council of teachers of English. The James R. Squire Office of Policy Research. (2010),  www.ncte.org
[83]
Sykes, G., Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 77, No. 7, (1996), pp. 465-476.
[84]
Engestro¨m, Y., Expansive learning at work. Toward activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of education and work, Vol. 14, No. 1, (2001), pp. 133- 156.
[85]
Bereiter, C., Education and mind in the knowledge society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (2002).

نامه به سردبیر

سر دبیر نشریه فناوری آموزش، با تواضع انتشار نامه های واصله از نویسندگان و خوانندگان و بحث در سامانه نشریه را ظرف 3 ماه از تاریخ انتشار آنلاین مقاله در سامانه و یا قبل از انتشار چاپی نشریه، به منظور اصلاح و نظردهی امکان پذیر نموده است.، البته این شامل نقد در مورد تحقیقات اصلی مقاله نمی باشد.

توچه به موارد ذیل پیش از ارسال نامه به سردبیر لازم است در نظر گرفته شود:


[1]نامه هایی که شامل گزارش از آمار، واقعیت ها، تحقیقات یا نظریه ها هستند، لازم است همراه با منابع معتبر و مناسب باشند، اگرچه ارسال بیش از زمان 3 نامه توصیه نمی گردد

[2] نامه هایی که بجای انتقاد سازنده به ایده های تحقیق، مشتمل بر حملات شخصی به نویسنده باشند، توجه و چاپ نمی شود

[3] نامه ها نباید بیش از 300 کلمه باشد

[4] نویسندگان نامه لازم است در ابتدای نامه تمایل یا عدم تمایل خود را نسبت به چاپ نظریه ارسالی نسبت به یک مقاله خاص اعلام نمایند

[5] به نامه های ناشناس ترتیب اثر داده نمی شود

[6] شهر، کشور و محل سکونت نویسندگان نامه باید در نامه مشخص باشد.

[7] به منظور شفافیت بیشتر و محدودیت حجم نامه، ویرایش بر روی آن انجام می پذیرد.

CAPTCHA Image