نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه خوارزمی
2 گروه فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار دانشگاه خوارزمی
چکیده
چکیده تصویری
)
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The aim of this Research is study The nature of the relationship between teacher And learner in comprehensive e-Learning Process with an emphasis on ideas of Deleuze To reach this aim,This study from qualitative research and of kind analytic philosophical and inductive. Informationgathering method is library-documentary.First, basic factors in rhizomatic epistemology of Deleuze were investigated.Then, the nature of relationship in Virtual Learning process was illuminated. At the end the nature of relationship Virtual Learning in relation with, the nature of rhizomatic epistemology of Deleuze was examined. The findings of the research indicate that the rhizomatic nature based on connectionism and networking of deconstruction, migration and flexibility. Furthermore, the nature of relationship in Virtual Learning is based on connectionism theory, according to which relationship in Virtual Learning is a systematic and network relationship where there is nonlinear relationship among system elements and the network. based on this theory, learning is itself the relationships of system elements with each other. Thus, its direction is parallel with rhizomatic relationship of Deleuze. Therefore, rhizomatic epistemology in post-constructivism can be an analytical tool to delineate the desired relationship between teacher and learner in Virtual Learning era.
کلیدواژهها [English]
[3] Dansei, M. (2009). Dictionary of media and communications. New York: M.E. npu.edu.ua/!ebook/book/djvu/A/iif_kgpm_Dictionary_of_Media.pdf
[6] Shorts, E. (2013). Methodology for curriculum studies. Translated by Mehrmohammadi et al. Tehran: Publications of the Organization for the Study and Compilation of Human Sciences Books of Universities.2013. [In Persian].
[8] Bagheri, Kh., & Attaran, M. (1997). Philosophy Contemporary Education, First Edition. Tehran: Institute of Culture and Publications Mehrab ghalalm. [In Persian]
[9] Peters, M., & Burbules, N. C. (2004). Poststructuralism and Educational Research. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
[10] Zaimran, M. (2010). The Future of Philosophy: An Investigation into Contemporary Philosophical Thoughts. Tehran: Nazar Pazian.
[13] Rough, J. (2008). The Case of Gilles Deleuze: Deleuze of Vote and Works. translated by Mostafa Amiri, The Monthly Book of the Moon of Philosophy, 3(20), 3-31. [In Persian]
[14] Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education and becoming. Rotterdam, The Netherlands:Sense Publishers.
[15] Hwu, W.-S. (2004). Gilles Deleuze andJacques Daignault: Understanding Curriculum as Difference and Sense. Expanding curriculum theory: Dis/positions and lines of flight, 181.
[16] Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in Nomadic Spaces: Deleuze and Curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
[18] Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2002). DialoguesII. NewYork: Columbia Univerity Press.
[19] Salahshouri, A.& Imanzadeh, A. (2011). A look at analytical and meta-analytic approaches in the philosophy of education. Hamedan: Bu-Ali Sina University.
[21] Gough, N. (2006). Changing planes: towards a geophilosophy of transnational curriculum inquiry.
[22] Zaimran, M. (2004). Gilles Deleuze The Philosophy of Transformation and Distinction, The Book of the Months of Literature and Philosophy,9(80), 48-87. [In Persian]
[23] Colman, F.F. (2005). Rhizome, Deleuze Dictionary ,Edited by Adrian Parr, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
[25] Malins,P, (2004), Deleuze, Guattari and an Ethico-Aesthetics of Drug Use. Janus Head 7(1), 84-104.
[26] Coolbrooke, C. (2008). Gilles Deleuze, translated by Reza Sirvan. Tehran: Center .
[27] Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press.
[28] Bayne, S. (2004). Smoothness and Striation in Digital Learning Spaces. ELearning, 1(2), 302-316.
[29] Ropers-huilman, B. (2008). Feminist teaching in theory and practice: situating power and knowledge in poststructural classrooms. New York: Teacher College.
[30] Deleuze, G. (1987). The Movement ــImage Trans. H. Tomlinson and B.Habberjam. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
[31] Parker, C. D. (2004). A descriptive study to identify deterrents to participation in employer-provided e-learning. Capella University.
[33] Igma, A. (2009).The Transition in the Educational System. The Developmental Technique of Educational Technology, 25(206), 2-3. [In Persian]
[34] Peters, M. (2010). The idea of openness: Open education and education for openness. The encyclopaedia of educational philosophy and theory.
[36] Ma, L., Doug, V., & Christian, W. (2000). Will virtual education initiatives succeed?. Information Technology and Management, 1(4): 209-227.
[38] Fenoglio, P. J. (2006). Pinball engagement and Connectivism: Newunderstandings of learning in the 21st Century.
[41] Siemens. G. (2006a). Knowing knowledge. KnowingKnowledge.com Electronic book.
[42] Ahmadi, B. (1994). Critical Modernism and Principle. Tehran: Center [In Persian]
[47] Zare sefat, S., Dehghani, M. & Javadipour, M. (2017). Study of the mental container of high school students in teaching classes. Quarterly Journal of Research, 5(2), 17-33. [In Persian].
[48] Ziba kalam mofrad, F. & Mohammadi, H. (2014). Comparative Study of Critical Thinking from the Viewpoint of Robert Anis and Henry Giroux, Regarding Its Use to Improve Teacher Education System. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 5(3), 19-38. [In Persian].
)