ماهیت ارتباط بین معلم وفراگیر درفرایندیادگیری الکترونیک باتاکید برآراء دلوز

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه خوارزمی

2 گروه فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار دانشگاه خوارزمی

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، بررسی ماهیت ارتباط بین معلم وفراگیر درفرایندیادگیری الکترونیک باتاکید برآراء دلوز است. روش پژوهش از جنس ،پژوهش های کیفی واز نوع تحلیل فلسفی واستنتاجی است روش گرداوری اطلاعات،کتابخانه ای –اسنادی است..بدین منظور نخست، مولفه‌های اساسی در معرفت‌شناسی ریزومی دلوز تحلیل شد؛ سپس، ماهیت ارتباط در فرایند آموزش مجازی تبیین گردید و در نهایت ماهیت ارتباط در آموزش مجازی در نسبت با ارتباط در معرفت شناسی ریزوماتیک دلوز، ارزیابی گردید. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از این است که، ماهیت ارتباط ریزوماتیک مبتنی بر ارتباط‌گرایی، شبکه‌ سازی، ساخت شکنی، شدن، کوچ‌گرایی وانعطاف پذیری است. همچنین ماهیت ارتباط درآموزش مجازی، مبتنی بر نظریه ارتباط‌گرایی است که طبق آن، ارتباط در آموزش مجازی، ارتباطی است سیستمی و شبکه‌ای، که روابط غیرخطی بین اجزای سیستم و شبکه برقرار است. طبق این نظریه، آموزش مجازی همان، فرایند برقراری ارتباطات اجزای شبکه با یکدیگر است؛ لذا جهت‌گیری ارتباط الکترونیکی همسو با ارتباط ریزوماتیک دلوز می‌باشد. از این رو معرفت شناسی ریزومی در پساساختارگرایی می‌تواند به عنوان یک مدل در جهت رفع بسیاری از چالش‌های نظام آموزشی سنتی برآید و ترسیم کننده ارتباط مطلوب بین معلم و فراگیر درعصر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات باشد.

چکیده تصویری

ماهیت ارتباط بین معلم وفراگیر درفرایندیادگیری الکترونیک باتاکید برآراء دلوز

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Study The nature of the relationship between teacher And learner in comprehensive e-Learning Process with an emphasis on ideas of Deleuze

نویسندگان [English]

  • nasibe tari 1
  • Saeid Zarghami-Hamrah 2
  • alireza mahmoodnia 1
  • yahya ghaedi 3
1 university kharazmi
2 Department of philosopphy of education, Kharazmi Universirt, Tehran, Iran
3 university kharazmi
چکیده [English]

The aim of this Research is study The nature of the relationship between teacher And learner in comprehensive e-Learning Process with an emphasis on ideas of Deleuze To reach this aim,This study from qualitative research and of kind analytic philosophical and inductive. Informationgathering method is library-documentary.First, basic factors in rhizomatic epistemology of Deleuze were investigated.Then, the nature of relationship in Virtual Learning process was illuminated. At the end the nature of relationship Virtual Learning in relation with, the nature of rhizomatic epistemology of Deleuze was examined. The findings of the research indicate that the rhizomatic nature based on connectionism and networking of deconstruction, migration and flexibility. Furthermore, the nature of relationship in Virtual Learning is based on connectionism theory, according to which relationship in Virtual Learning is a systematic and network relationship where there is nonlinear relationship among system elements and the network. based on this theory, learning is itself the relationships of system elements with each other. Thus, its direction is parallel with rhizomatic relationship of Deleuze. Therefore, rhizomatic epistemology in post-constructivism can be an analytical tool to delineate the desired relationship between teacher and learner in Virtual Learning era.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • relationship
  • epistemology
  • Virtual Learning
  • teacher
  • learner

[1] Bagheri Noaparast, K. (2014). A second- order implici knowledge: Its implications for e-learning. Elearning and digital media, 11(6), 633-643.

 

[2] Zarghami-Hamrah, S. (2016). Revisiting the role of teaching practice in authentic communication in moocs.  Conference of International network of philosophers of education, warsaw. Poland.

 

[3] Dansei, M. (2009). Dictionary of media and communications. New York:  M.E. npu.edu.ua/!ebook/book/djvu/A/iif_kgpm_Dictionary_of_Media.pdf

 

[4] Semetsky, I. (2003). The problematics of human subjectivity: Gilles Deleuze and the Deweyan legacy. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(2), 211-225.

 

[5] Hosseini Shahroudi, S. (2004). Philosophical analysis and analytic philosophy. Quranic Quranic Teachings Journal, 4(12), 9- 57. [In Persian]

 

[6] Shorts, E. (2013). Methodology for curriculum studies. Translated by Mehrmohammadi et al. Tehran: Publications of the  Organization for the Study and Compilation of Human Sciences Books of Universities.2013. [In Persian].

 

[7] Shabani varaki, B. (2006). Critique of Methodology of Educational Research in Iran. Quarterly  Journal of Education, 30(85), 12-42. [In Persian]

 

 [8]  Bagheri, Kh., & Attaran, M. (1997). Philosophy Contemporary Education, First Edition. Tehran: Institute of Culture and Publications Mehrab ghalalm. [In Persian]

 

 [9] Peters, M., & Burbules, N. C. (2004). Poststructuralism and Educational Research. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

 

[10] Zaimran, M. (2010). The Future of Philosophy: An Investigation into Contemporary Philosophical Thoughts. Tehran: Nazar Pazian.

 

[11] Marshall, J. D. (2006). Poststructuralism, philosophy, pedagogy (Vol.12): Springer Science & Business Media.

 

[12] Morss, J. R. (2004). Gilles Deleuze and the space of education: Poststructuralism, critical psychology, and schooled bodies Poststructuralism, philosophy, pedagogy (pp. 85-97): Springer.

 

[13] Rough, J. (2008). The Case of Gilles Deleuze: Deleuze of Vote and Works. translated by Mostafa Amiri, The Monthly Book of the Moon of Philosophy, 3(20), 3-31. [In Persian]

 

[14] Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education and becoming. Rotterdam, The Netherlands:Sense Publishers.

 

[15] Hwu, W.-S. (2004). Gilles Deleuze andJacques Daignault: Understanding Curriculum as Difference and Sense. Expanding curriculum theory: Dis/positions and lines of flight, 181.

 

[16] Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in Nomadic Spaces: Deleuze and Curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.

 

[17] Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987).  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Brian Massumi, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

 

[18] Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2002). DialoguesII. NewYork: Columbia Univerity Press.

 

[19] Salahshouri, A.& Imanzadeh, A. (2011).  A look at analytical and  meta-analytic approaches in the philosophy of education.  Hamedan: Bu-Ali Sina University.

 

[20] Semetsky, I. (2008). Nomadic Education: Variations on a Theme by  Deleuze and Guattari. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.     

 

[21] Gough, N. (2006). Changing planes: towards a geophilosophy of transnational curriculum inquiry.

 

[22] Zaimran, M. (2004). Gilles Deleuze The Philosophy of Transformation and  Distinction, The Book of the Months of Literature and Philosophy,9(80), 48-87. [In Persian]

 

[23] Colman, F.F. (2005). Rhizome, Deleuze Dictionary ,Edited by Adrian Parr, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

 

[24] Deleuze, G. (1994).  Difference and Repetition (Paul Patton, Trans). NewYork: Columbia University Press.

         

[25] Malins,P, (2004), Deleuze, Guattari and an Ethico-Aesthetics of Drug Use. Janus Head 7(1), 84-104.

 

[26] Coolbrooke, C. (2008). Gilles Deleuze, translated by Reza Sirvan. Tehran: Center .

 

[27] Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press.

 

[28] Bayne, S. (2004). Smoothness and Striation in Digital  Learning Spaces. ELearning, 1(2), 302-316.

 

[29] Ropers-huilman, B. (2008). Feminist teaching in theory and practice: situating power and knowledge in poststructural classrooms. New York: Teacher College.

 

[30] Deleuze, G. (1987). The Movement ــImage Trans. H. Tomlinson and B.Habberjam. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

 

[31] Parker, C. D. (2004). A descriptive study to identify deterrents to participation in employer-provided e-learning. Capella University.

 

[32] Ali Mosa, A.,  Mahrin, M.N., &  Ibrrahim, R. (2016). Technological Aspects of E-Learning Readiness in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Computer and  Information Science, 9(1), 13.

 

[33] Igma, A. (2009).The Transition in the Educational System. The Developmental  Technique of Educational Technology, 25(206), 2-3. [In Persian]

 

[34] Peters, M. (2010). The idea of openness: Open education and education for openness. The encyclopaedia of educational philosophy and theory.  

 

[35] Saleem, M. M. (2009). An exploratory study of the implementation of computer technology in an american islamic private school: The University of Wisconsin-Madison.   

 

[36] Ma, L., Doug, V.,  & Christian, W. (2000). Will virtual education initiatives succeed?.  Information Technology and Management, 1(4): 209-227.

 

[37] Rezaee, E., Nasri, S. & Azmard, M.  (2011). The theory of communication learning and its application in the design of a university textbook. Journal of Research and Academic Writing, 14(24), 81-94. [In Persian]

 

[38] Fenoglio, P. J. (2006). Pinball engagement and Connectivism: Newunderstandings of learning in the 21st Century.

 

[39] Massyn, L. (2009). A framework for learning design in different modes of delivery in an adult learning programme. University of the Free State.

 

[40] Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning: University of Manitoba Winnipeg.

 

[41] Siemens. G. (2006a). Knowing knowledge.       KnowingKnowledge.com Electronic book.

 

[42] Ahmadi, B. (1994). Critical Modernism and Principle. Tehran: Center [In Persian]

 

[43] Giroux, H. A. (2003). Public Pedagogy and Politics of Resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational philosophy and theory, 35(1),  5-16.  

 

[44] Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the Web: The Past, Present and Future of the World Wide Web by its Creator. Orion Business Press: London.

  

[45] Raschke, C.A. (2003). The Digital Revolution and The coming of the postmodern university. London: Routledge.

 

[46] Gough, N. (2006). Shaking the tree, making a      rhizome: toward a nomadic  geophilosophy of science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 625 – 645. 

 

[47] Zare sefat, S., Dehghani, M. & Javadipour, M. (2017). Study of the mental container of high school students in teaching classes. Quarterly Journal of Research, 5(2), 17-33. [In Persian].

 

[48]  Ziba kalam mofrad, F. & Mohammadi, H. (2014). Comparative Study of Critical Thinking from the Viewpoint of Robert Anis and Henry Giroux, Regarding Its Use to Improve Teacher Education System. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 5(3),  19-38. [In Persian].