کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مدرس دانشگاه غیرانتفاعی پویندگان دانش چالوس

2 دانشگاه شهید رجایی تهران

3 گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
هدف مقاله، کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه می باشد. در این نوشتار، منطق یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه از جنبه های مختلف مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. با توجه به هدف اصلی پژوهش و عنایت به اینکه منطق بر اساس مبانی، اصول و رسالت های آن تعریف می شود، پرسش ها ی پنجگانه پژوهش مبنی بر چگونگی مبانی فلسفی، روانشناختی و اجتماعی یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه، رسالت و اصول این یادگیری مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. برای دستیابی به تحلیل و تبیین فوق از روش سنتزپژوهی استفاده شد که در آن پژوهش های مرتبط با یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه با روشی نظام مند انتخاب، واکاوی محتوایی و دسته بندی شدند. در مرحله بعد 100 پژوهش که معیارهای مورد نظر را داشتند انتخاب شدند، سپس ترکیبی از یافته های آنان طبق اصول تلفیق، بازاندیشی و بازآرایی داده ها، ارائه شده است. محقق به وسیله یافته های این پژوهش و با مشخص نمودن مبانی فلسفی، روانشناختی و اجتماعی یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه و ترسیم رسالت و اصول این نوع یادگیری تلاش کرد تا منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه را تحلیل و تبیین نماید.

چکیده تصویری

کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploration and Explanation of the Rationale of Project-Based Curriculum

نویسندگان [English]

  • maryam yousefi 1
  • Ali Hoseini Khah 3
1 pooyandegane danesh uneversity, chalus, iran
3 Department of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The goal of this article is about explain and analysis of project based curriculum. This study has considered rationale of project based learning in different aspects. In attention to the main goal of research and also rational of curriculum that is defined based on its basics, principles, and messages, so the fivefold questions of research include how defined the philosophical, psychological, and social basics of project based learning and the same time it considered its message and principles. In order to reach to analyze and explain of above aim applied research syntheses in which selected, contextualized, and categorized researches related to project based learning with a regular method. In the next step selected 100 researches which had objective criteria, then based on syntheses principles, rethinking, data rearrangement presented combination of their findings. Researcher with the help of research and with identifying of philosophical, psychological, and social basics of project based learning and drawing of message and principles of this kind of learning tried to analysis and explain rationale of project based curriculum.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: project
  • Curriculum
  • rational curriculum
  • constructionism
  • project based curriculum

[1] Pyke, Norman. (1993). Ablest’ being hindered’, Time Educational Supplement.

[2] Maleki, Hasan. 2009. Curriculum (action guide) (2nd Ed). Tehran: Madreseh [in Persian].

[3]mehrmohammadi, Mahmood. & Colleagues (2009).curriculum:Theories,Approaches and Perspectives.(3nd Ed),Tehran: Samt [in Persian]

[4] Bruner, Jerome. (1977). The process of education. Harvard university press, Cambridge,M.A.

[5]Fathi Vajargah, Kourosh. (2009). Priciples and Concepts of curriculum. Tehran: Baal [in Persian].

[6]Naghibzadeh, Ahmad. (1995). A look at the philosophy of education (6nd Ed).Tehran: Tahoori. [In Persian].

[7]David, Jozeph. (2008). What Research Says About … / Project-Based Learning.Teaching Students to Think, 65 (5), 80-82.

[8]Kilpatrick, William. Heard. (1929). The Project Method: The Use of the Purposeful Act in the Educative Process. Published by: Teachers College, Colombia University. Eleventh Impression.

[9]Akker, Daivid. (2007). Curriculum design research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the east China Normal University, Shanghai (RR China), 23-26.

[10]Fernandes, Sandra. Raquel. Gonsalves. (2014). Preparing graduates for professional practice: Findings from a case study of Project-based Learning (PBL).Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 139. 219 – 226.

[11]Koutrouba, Konstantina, & Karageorgou, Elissavet. (2013). Cognitive and socio-affective outcomes of project-based learning: Perceptions of Greek Second Chance School students. Improving Schools, 16(3), 244-260. Reprints and permissions:sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

[12]Kaldi, Stanroula. Filippatou, Diamanto. & Govaris, Christos. (2011). Project-based learning in primary Schools: effects on pupils' learning and attitudes Education 3-13. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 39(1), 35-47.

[13]Chan Lin, Lih. Juan. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovat Educ Teach Int; 45(1), 55-56.

[14]Ciftci, Sabahattin. (2015). The Effects of Using Project-Based Learning in Social Studies Education to Students' Attitudes towards Social Studies Courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 186, 1019 – 1024

[15]Dauletova, Victoria. (2014). Expanding Omani Learners’ Horizons through Project Based Learning: A Case Study.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 183– 203. Reprintsandpermissions:sagepub.com/journalsPermissions. nav. DOI:10.1177/2329490614530553. bcq.sagepub.com.

[16]Bas, Gokhan. & Beyhan, Omer. (2010). Effects of multiple intelligences supported Project based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3).

[17]Rhodes, Carl. & Garrick, John. (2003). Project-based Learning and the limits of corporate knowledg. Journal of Management Education. 27(4), 447-471...

[18]Kettanun, Cameen. (2015). Project-based Learning and Its Validity in a Thai EFL Classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 567 – 573. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com.

[19]Sultana, Munawer. & Zaki, Sajida. (2015). "Proposing Project Based Learning as an Alternative to traditional ELT pedagogy at public colleges in Pakistan", International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 155-173.

[20]Shafaei, Azadeh. Abdol Rahim, Hajar. (2015). Does project-based learning enhance Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 83-99. Stiggins, R. J. (1995, November). Assessment literacy for the21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, pp238-245.

[21]Musa, Faridah. Mufti, Norlaila. Abdul Latiff, Rozmel. & Mohamed Amin, Maryam. (2011). Project Based learning (PjBL): inculcating soft skills in 21st century workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 59, 565 – 573. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com.

[22]Bagheri, Mohsen. Wan, Ali. Wan, Zah. Abdullah, Maria. C. & Mohd Daud, Shaffe. (2013). Project-Based learning as a facilitator to promote students’ technology competencies. World Journal on Educational Technology, 5, 207-214.

[23]Kai Wah Chu, Samuel. Tse, S. K. & Chow, Ken. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research 33, 132–143.Contents lists available at ScienceDirect.

[24]Butler, Alison. & Christofili, Monica. (2014). Project-Based Learning Communities in Developmental Education:A Case Study of Lessons Learned. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38:638–650

[25]Ergül, Remziye. & Elif, Keskin. Kargin. (2014).The Effect of Project Based Learning on Students’ Science Success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136, 537 – 541. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

[26]Dauletova, Victoria. (2014). Expanding Omani Learners’ Horizons through Project Based Learning: A Case Study.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 183– 203. Reprints and permissions:sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.DOI:10.1177/2329490614530553. bcq.sagepub.com.

[27]Filippatou. Diamanto. & Kaldi. Stanroula. (2010). The effectiveness Of Project-Based Learning on Pupils with Learning Difficultis Regarding Academic Performance. Group Work and Motivation.

[28]Van Rooij, Shahron. Williams. (2009). Scaffolding project-based learning with the project Management Body Of Knowledge (PMBOK). Computers & Education, 52, 210–219.Contents lists available at Science Direct.

[29]Stappenbelt, Bard. & Rowles, Chris. (2009). Project based learning in the first year engineering curriculum. 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (AAEE 2009), 411-416. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide.

[30]Wurdinger, Scott. Haar, Jean. & Hugg, Robert. (2007). A qualitative study using Project-based learning in a mainstream middle school Minnesota State University. Mankato, USA: Improving Schools © SAGE Publications, Volume10, Number 2,150–161. ISSN 1365-4802.

[31]Fernandes, Marcello. Augusto. Costa. (2015). Project-Based Learning laboratory for teaching embedded systems. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Mathematical Problems in Engineering. Volume 2015, Article ID 236749, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/236749.

[32]Fragoulis, Losif. & Tsiplakides, Lacavos. (2009). Project-Based Learning in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Greek Primary Schools: From Theory to Practice.English Language Teaching,2(3). www.ccsenet.org/journal.html.

[33]Karaman, Selcuk. & Celik, Suat. (2008). An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers following project-based learning. Int J Technol Des Educ, 18, 203–215.

[34]Chartier, Benjamin.. & Gibson, Brad. (2007). Project-Based Learning: A Search and Rescue UAV–Perceptions of an Undergraduate Engineering Design Team: A Preliminary Study. Proceedings of the 2007 AaeE Conference, Melbourne.

[35]Scarbrough, Harry. Swan, Jacky. Laurent, Stephan. Bresnen. Mike. Edelman, Linda. & Newell, Sue. (2004). Project-Based Learning and the Role of Learning Boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9): 1579–1600, ISSN 0170–8406. SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks, CA & New Delhi).Downloaded from oss.sagepub.com at INDIANA UNIV.

[36]Fardanesh, Hashem. Nouri, Ali. (2010).instructional Design, Based on a Project-based learning model: Construction-oriented approach to educational design. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. [In Persian]

[37]Pelech, James. (2008). Delivering Constructivism through Project Based Learning. Copyright ©2008 by Institute for Learning Centered Education.

[38]Lasauskiene, Jolanta. & Rauduvaite, Asta. (2015). Project-Based Learning at University: Teaching Experiences of Lecturers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 788 – 792. 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, (WCES-2015), Novotel Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com.

[39]Lou, Shi. Jer. Chang, Chih. Chao.Dzan, Wei. Yuan. & Shih, Ru, Chu. (2012). Construction of a Creative Instructional Design Model Using Blended, Project-Based Learning fo1290. Published Online November 2012 in SciRes (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ce). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.37187.

[40]Hou, Houe. Tse. (2010). Exploring the behavioral patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – July 2010, 9, Issue: 3.

[41]Altun Yalcin, Sema. Turgut, Umit. & Buyukkasap, Erdugan. (2009). International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1 (1), 81-105.

[42]Achilles, Cillvia. Hoover, Stephan. (1996). Exploring Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Grades 6-12. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid South Educational Research Association.

[43]Milentijevic, Ivan. Ciric, Veladimir. & Vojinovic, Oliver. (2008). Version control in project based learning. Computers & Education 50, 1331–1338.

[44]Ayas, Karen. & Zeniuk, Nick. (2001). Project-based learning: Building communities of Reflecthve practitioners.published by: SAGE, London, thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, 32(1), 61-76.

[45]Hertzog, Nancy. (1994). Impediments to a Project-Based and Integrated Curriculum: A Qualitative Study of Curriculum Reform. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

[46]Edmund C, Short. (1931). Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. Translated by Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi and colleagues (2nd Ed). Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].

[47]Chalmers, Iain. Hedges, Larry. & Cooper, Harris. (2002) A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and Health Professionals, 25, 12-37.

[48]Glass, Gene. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10),3-8.

[49]Barnett-Page, Eline. & Thomas, James. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. UK: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.

[50]Gough, Daivid. Oliver, Sandy. &Thomas, James. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews.UK: Sage.

[51]Guteg, Gerald. (1997). Philosophical Schools and Examinations. Translate by Jaafar Pakseresht (2015). Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].

[52]Kilpatrick, William. Heard. (1951). Philosophy of Education. x +465. New York Published by: Macmillan Company.

[54]Moursund, Daivid. Bielefeldt, Talbot. & Underwood, Siobhan. (1997). Foundations for the Road Ahead: Project-based learning and information technologies. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.

[54] Thomas, James. (1998). Project based learning overview. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

[55] Geier, Rabert. Blumenfeld, Phyllis. Marx, Ronald. Krajcik, Joseph. Fishman, Barry. Soloway,Elliot. (2008).Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 922–939.

[56] Strobel, Johannes. & Barneveld, Angela van. (2008). When is PBL more effective? A meta Synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3, 44–58.

[57] Wurdinger, Scott. & Enloe, Walter. (2011). Cultivating life skills at a project-based charter school. Improving Schools, 14(1), 84–96.

[58]Hergenhahn, B. R; Olson, Matio. H. (2005). AnIntroduction to Theories of Learning (13nd Ed) [In Persian].

[59]Armstrong, Thomas. (2000). Multiple intelligence in the classroom (6nd Ed). Translate by Mahshid Safari (2008). Tehran: Doran [In Persian].

[60]Seif, Ali Akbar. (2008). Modern Educational Psychology (6nd Ed). Tehran: Doran [In Persian].

[61]Williams, Marison. & Burden, Robert. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. UK:Cambridge University Press. full potential. Journal of Marketing Education. 45-53. From the SAGE social science collections.

[62]Takaya, Keiichi. (2008). Jerome Bruner’s Theory of Education: From Early Bruner to Later Bruner.Interchange; 39(1): 1–19.

[63]Blank, William. (1997). Authentic instruction. In William. Blank & Ssandy. Harwell (Eds.), Promising practices for connecting high school to the real world,15-21. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED:407586).

[64]Dickinson, Kathrine. Soukamneuth, Sengsouvanh. Hanh. Cao. Yu. Kimball, Mary. D’Amico, Ronald. Perry, Rebecca. & et al. (1998).Providing educational services in the Summer Youth Employment and Training Program [Technical assistance guide].

[66]Reyes, Raymond. (1998). Native perspective on the school reform movement: A hot topics paper. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Comprehensive Center Region X.

[66]Hennes, Marie. (1921). Project teaching in an advanced fifth grade. Retrieved April 13, 2005,fromhttp://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=3996.

[67]Brewster, Cori. & Fager, Jenifer. (2000). Increasing student engagement and motivation: From time-on-task to homework. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Buchanan D, Badham R. Power, politics, and organizational change: winning the turf game. London: Sage Publishers.

[68]Adderley, Kenneth. (1975). Project Methods in Higher Education. SRHE working party on teaching methods: Techniques group. Guildford, Surrey: Society for research into higher education.

[69]Edutopia Team (2008). Why Teach with Project-Based Learning? Providing Students with a Well-Rounded Classroom Experience.

[70]Bagheri, Mohsen. Wan, Ali. Wan, Zah. Abdullah, Chong, Maria. & Mohd Daud, Shaffe. (2013). Project-Based learning as a facilitator to promote students’ technology competencies. World Journal on Educational Technology, 5, 207-214.

[71]Keegan, Anne. & Turner, Rodney. (2001). Quantity versus quality in Project-based learning practices. Management Learning. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, 32(1), 77-98.

[72]Fleming, Douglas (2000).A Teacher's Guide to Project-Based Learning. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED),Washington, DC.

[73]Helm, Judy. Harris. & Katz, Lilian. (2001).young investigators: The project approach in the early years. Published by: Teachers College, Columbia University, New York and London.

[74]Wurdinger, Scott. & Rudolph, Jenifer. (2009). A different type of success: teaching important life skills through project based learning. Improving Schools, 12(2), 115-129.

[75]Langhout, Regina. Day. Rappaport, Julian. & Simmons, Doretha. (2002). Integrating community In to the classroom. Urban Education, 37, 323-349.

[76]Bartscher, Katty. Gould, Brinda. & Nutter, Sharon. (1995). Increasing student motivating Through project-based learning. Master’s research project,Saint Xavier University and IRI/Skylight.

[77]Curtis, David. (2005). Start with the pyramid. Retrieved April 13, 2005, fromhttp://www.edutopia.org/php/article.php?id=Art_884.

[78]Liu, Min. & Hsiao, Yu-Ping. (2002). Middle school students as multimedia designers: A Project-based learning approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 311-337.

[79]Krajcik, Joseph. Blumenfeld, Phillis. Marx, Ronald. Bass, Kristin. Fredricks, Jennifer. & Soloway, Elliot. (1998).Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313–350.

[80]Marx, Ronald. Blumenfeld, Phillis. Krajcik, Joseph. & Soloway, Elliot. (1997). Enacting project-based science: Challenges for practice and policy. Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341–358.

[81]Prince, Michael Joseph. & Felder, Richard. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching an learning. Journal ofCollege Science Teaching, 36(5),14. Robson, C. (2002). Real World research (2nd Ed), Oxford: Blackwell.

[82]Railsback, Jennifer. (2002). Project-based Instruction: creating excitement for learning. portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

[83]Alloway, Gene. Bos, Nathan. Hamel, Kathleen. Hammerman, Tracy. Klann, Elisabeth. & Krajcik, Joseph.)1996(.Creating an inquiry learning environment using the World Wide Web Paper given at the International Conference on the Learning Sciences. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

[84]Moursund, David. (2003). Project-based learning using information technology. International Society for Technology in Education Eugene, OR.

[85]Gultekin, Mehmet. (2005).The effect of project based learning on learning outcomes in The 5th grade social studies course in primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(2), 548-556.

[86]Turgut, Halil. (2008). Prospective science teachers’ conceptualizations about project-based learning. International Journal of Instruction, 1 (1). 61-79.

[87]Yamzon, Alicia. (1999). An examination of the relationship between student choice in project-based learning and achievement. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from ERIC FullText.

[88]Diffily, Deborah. (2002). Project-based learning: Meeting social studies standards and the needs of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 40-43, 59.

[89]Woolfolk, Anita. (2004). Educational psychology (9th Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

[90]Stites, Rivard. (1998). What does research say about outcomes from project-based learning?

[91]Welsh, Jennifer. Alexandra. (2006). An exploration of project-based learning in two California Charter school. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree doctor of education. Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. UMI Number: 3233806.

[92]Helm, Judy. Harris. (2003). The project approach catalog 4: Literacy and project work. Retrieved April 13, 2005,fromhttp://ceep.crc.uiuc.edu/pubs/project4. html#foreword.

[93]Kilpatrick, William. Heard. (1918). The project method. Retrieved April 13, 2005, fromhttp://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=3606.

[94]Blumenfeld, Phillis. Soloway, Elliot. Marx, Rronald. W. Krajcik, Joseph. Guzdial, Mark. & Palincsar, Annemarie. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3&4), 369-398. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. To link to this article:

[95] Frame, Davidson. (1994).The new project management: tools for an age of rapid change, corporate reengineering and other business realities. USA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.

[96] Pinto, Jeffry. (1996). Power and politics in project management. USA: Project Management Institute.

[97]Arthur, Michael. DeFillippi, Rabert. & Jones, Candace. (2001). Project based learning as the Interplay of career and company non-financial capital. Management Learning; 32(1), 99–117.

[98]Krajcik, Joseph. & Czerniak, Charlen. Lochbiheler. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project based approach (4th ed). New York, NY: Routledge. 404, 79-95 .

[99]Dickinson, Katherine. Soukamneuth, Sengsuvanh. Cao, Yu, Hanh. Kimball, Mary. D’Amico, Ronald. Perry, Rrebecca. & et al. (1998). Providing educational services in the Summer Youth Employment and Training Program [Technical assistance guide]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Policy & Research.

[100]Larmer, John. & Mergendoller, John. (2010). Seven Essentials for Project-Based Learning. Giving Students Meaningful [101]Diffily, D. (2002). Project-based learning: Meeting social studies standards and the needs of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 40-43, 59.

[101]Diffily, D. (2002). Project-based learning: Meeting social studies standards and the needs of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 40-43, 59.