تاثیر بوردهای هوشمند برافزایش انگیزه و یادگیری افعال چند کلمه ای توسط زبان آموزان انگلیسی بعنوان زبان خارجی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

2 گروه زﺑﺎن اﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯿﺎن، ﺑﯿﺮﺟﻨﺪ

3 دانشجوی دکتری تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی (ره)، تهران

چکیده

این تحقیق به بررسی تاثیر وایت بوردهای هوشمند بعنوان یک وسیله مفید آموزش بر یادگیری افعال دو کلمه ای و انگیزه یادگیری زبان آموزان سال چهارم در شهرستان خرمشهر، ایران پرداخته است. از میان کلاس های سال چهارم دبیرستان یکی از دبیرستان های خرمشهر دو کلاس به صورت تصادفی انتخاب شده است. و از هر کلاس 15 نفر که علاقه مند به شرکت در کلاس فوق العاده زبان انگلیسی بودند به صورت هدفمند انتخاب شدند تعداد کل دانش آموزان 30 نفر بوده است. برای انجام پژوهش از طرح پژوهشی اندازه گیری مکرر استفاده شده است. فراگیران ابتدا پبش آزمون افعال دو کلمه ای و پرسشنامه انگیزه را دریافت نمودند. سپس طی هشت جلسه افعال دو کلمه ای بوسیله ابزاز برد هوشمند آموزش داده شد. سپس پس آزمون ها برگزار گردید. و بعد از سه هفته آزمون های پی گیری برگزار شد. داده های بوسیله آزمون تحلیل واریانس و آزمون تعقیبی بونفری تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که استفاده از برد هوشمند تاثیر مثیت معنادار بر یادگیری مداوم افعال دو کلمه ای و افزایش انگیزه فراگیران دارد.

چکیده تصویری

تاثیر بوردهای هوشمند برافزایش انگیزه و یادگیری افعال چند کلمه ای توسط زبان آموزان انگلیسی بعنوان زبان خارجی

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

On the impact of using smart boards on improving EFL learners' motivation and learning of phrasal verbs

نویسندگان [English]

  • Godarz Ali Bakhshi 1
  • Mohammad Zeinali 2
  • Morteza Bakhtiarvand 3
1 Allameh University
2 English Language Department, Farhangiyan University, Birjand
3 PhD Student of Educational Technology,Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’iUniversity, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The use of smart boards in teaching English as a foreign language has been of much concern to English language teachers since a couple of years ago. However, the impact of smart boards on learning phrasal verbs and attitudes of Iranian learners of English language has not been appropriately investigated. The present study aimed at investigating the impact of smart boards on learning phrasal verbs and motivation of language learners for learning a foreign language. In doing so, 30 EFL learners at a high school in Khoramshahr were selected through convenience sampling. They received instruction on phrasal verbs through smart board within 8 weeks. The participants' scores on pretest, posttest, and follow up tests on motivation and phrasal verbs were submitted to two different repeated measures ANOVA. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the participants' scores on pretest and posttest of both phrasal verbs and motivation test. Therefore, it could be argued that the use of small boards can significantly contribute to the learners' motivation and learning of phrasal verbs. The results can be implied by language teachers

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • smart
  • phrasal
  • motivation
  • learners
  • attitude

[1] Abrams, Z. I. (2008). Socio-pragmatic features of learner-to learner computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 1–27.

[2] Abraham, B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.

[3] AbuSeileek, A. (2009). The effect of using an online based course on the acquisition of grammar inductively and deductively. ReCALL Journal, 21(3), 20-38.

[4] Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). IWBs: Boon or Bandwagon? A critical review of the Literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101

[5] Wood, R. (1999). Thinking about the Internet pedagogically. Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey Campus at Camden. Retrieved April 17, 2015 from http://www.camden.rutgers.edu

[6] Schmid, E. C. (2006). Investigating the use of IWB technology in the English language theory of Technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 47-62.

[7] Kennewell, S. (2001). IWBs - yet another Solution looking for a problem to solve. Information Technology in Teacher Education, 39, 3-6.

[8] Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of IWBs and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241

[9] Smart Technologies Inc. [SMART]. (2006). Interactive whiteboards and learning improving student learning outcomes and streamlining lesson planning. White Paper, Retrieved from: http://downloads01.smarttec

[10] Souhila, B. (2013). We need change! The Interactive White Board in the EFL context. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 379-384.

[11] Türel, Y. K., & Demirli, C. (2010). Instructional interactive whiteboard materials: Designers’ perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1437–1442.

[12] Türel, Y.K., & Johnson, T.E. (2012). Teachers’ Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381–394.

[13] Yen, L. L., & Marek, M. (2011). Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (3), 118–129.

[14] Al-Sadig, Y.A. (2007). The role of smart boards in enhancing students’ oral presentations: The case of Al-Majma’ah Community College, King Saud University. Retrieved from: www.academia.edu.

[15] Alsied, S.M., & Pathan, M.M. (2013). The use of computer technology in EFL classroom: Advantages and implications. IJ-ELTS: International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 1(1), 61-71

[16] Smith, F., Hardman, F., Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 437-451

[17] Winzenried, A., Dalgarno, B., & Tinkler, J. (2010). The interactive whiteboard: A transitional technology supporting diverse teaching practices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 534-552

18] Winzenried, A., & Lee, M. (2012). Implementing interactive whiteboards: What can we learn? TEACH Journal of Christian Education, 1(1), 20-36.

[19] Wood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84-96.

[20] Starkman, N. (2006). The Wonders of Interactive Whiteboards. T.H.E. Journal, 33(10), 36-38. Retrieved July 15, 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/77102/

[21] Sutman, F., & Xin, J. (2011). Using the smart board in teaching social stories to students with autism. Teaching exceptional children, 43(4), 18-24.

[22] Russell, M. (2007). The impact of education technology on learner interactions. Educations Computing Research, 12(3), 441-456.

[23] Slay, H., Sieborger, I. & Hodgkinson Williams, C. A. (2008). An investigation into the Use of IWBs in South African schools. In IADIS Interfaces and human comprehension and their intrinsic motivation in reading. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 280-289

[24] Rajabi, A., Khodabakhshzadeh, H. (2015). The effect of implementation of smart board on Iranian lower-intermediate EFL learners' reading

[25] Kokkelenberg, E.C., Dillon, M., Christy, S. M. (2006). The effects of class size on student grades at a public university (CHERI Working Paper #88). Retrieved http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/

[26] Alvarez, C., Alarcon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Implementing collaborative learning activities in the classroom supported by one-to-one mobile computing: A design-based process, Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 1961–1976.

[27] Baker, J. (2007). Smart board in the music classroom. Music Eduactors Journal, 93(5), 18-22.

[28] Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching. NY: Allyn & Bacon

[29] Almajali, H., Al Abdallat, S.H., &, Shamayleh, N. (2016). The effectiveness of using smart board for teaching social studies at public schools in Jordan. Global Journal of Educational Foundation, 4(1), 227-233

[30] Fallah, M. (2016). The role of technology in EFL classroom: The case of smart board. International Journal of Modern Language Teaching and Learning, 1(3), 90-98.

[31]Shams, N., & Ketabi, S. (2015). Iranian teachers' attitudes towards the use of interactive whiteboards in English language teaching classrooms. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(3), 84-99.

[32] Sharpe, M. (2004). Chapter 1: The place of the new information technologies in the life of today's adolescent. Russian Education and Society, 46(6), 10-38

[33] Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? Computers &Education, 51, 1321-1341

[34] Enayati, T., Modanloo, Y., and Mir Kazemi, F., S. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Education. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(11), 21-36.

[35] Oak, M. (2012). Impact of technology on Education. Retrieved From http://www.ehow.com/list

[36] Dordinezhad, F. (1393). Development and Validation of motivation and attitude scale for learning English. Jastarhaye Zabani, 6(2), 107-128.[In Persian]