امکان سنجی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه یادگیری الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه کامپیوتر، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یادگار امام خمینی (ره) شهرری، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه ریاضی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یادگار امام خمینی (ره) شهرری، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه تجارت الکترونیک، واحد یادگار امام خمینی (ره) شهرری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش امکان سنجش و رتبه بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه یادگیری الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی است. در تحقیق حاضر براساس تحقیقات پیشین و نظر خبرگان عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه یادگیری الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی از نظر فاکتورهای سنجش توسعه یادگیری الکترونیکی شامل فاکتورهای انسانی، فنی، اجتماعی،سازمانی شناسایی شدند. برای آزمون و تایید فرضیه های تحقیق از روش های آماری و برای رتبه بندی شاخص ها، از رتبه بندی AHPفازی استفاده شده است. به این منظور دو پرسشنامه تنظیم گردید؛ پرسشنامه شماره یک به منظور صحت فرضیه های تحقیق و پرسشنامه دوم که پرسشنامه زوجیست برای رتبه بندی شاخص ها می باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل دانشجویان و اساتید دانشگاه واحد الکترونیکی دانشگاه آزاد در سال تحصیلی 96-95 می باشد. حجم نمونه آماری مطابق فرمول کوکران، معادل384 نفر در نظر گرفته شد که با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی انتخاب شدند. پرسشنامه ها بین 384 نفر توزیع گردید که از این تعداد 84 عدد از هر پرسشنامه به دلایل مختلف از جمله پاسخگویی اشتباه به سؤالات و نبودن زمان کافی حذف و تعداد 300 عدد از هر پرسشنامه مورد قبول واقع شد.

چکیده تصویری

امکان سنجی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه یادگیری الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluate and ranking the affecting factors in developing e-learning in higher education with fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamed Ahmadi 1
  • Elham Ghanbari 1
  • Seyed Mahmoud Khorasani Kiasari 2
  • Fateme Rahmani 3
1 Computer Department, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Yadegar-e- Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran
3 Student of the Department of E-commerce, Yadegar-e- Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and rank the effective factors in developing electronic learning in higher education. In this study, the effective factors in developing electronic learning in higher education were identified in terms of measuring factors of e-learning development including organizational, social, technical and human factors, based on previous researches and the opinion of experts. Statistical methods were used to test and confirm the research hypotheses and fuzzy AHP ranking method was used to rank the indicators. To this purpose two questionnaires were prepared. The first one is for evaluating the accuracy of the research hypotheses and the second one which is a pairwise questionnaire is for rating the indicators.
The statistical society of the research is all students and professors of electronic unit of Islamic Azad University in academic year of 95-96. The statistical sample size was considered 384 individuals based on Cochran formula which were selected through the random sampling method. The questionnaire were distributed among 384 individuals from which, 84 questionnaires were omitted due to different reasons such as wrong answers to the questions and the lack of enough time, and 300 questionnaire were accepted.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • e-Learning
  • Higher Education
  • fuzzy multi-criteria decision making
  • fuzzy AHP
  • Islamic Azad university of Electronic unit

[1] Farhadi, R. (2015). E-learning new paradigm in the information age. Journal of science and technology, 21(1), 49-66. [in Persian].

 

[2] Seraji, F., & Attaran, M. (2011). E-learning: Basics, design, implementation and evaluation. Hamedan: Bu Ali Sina University Press. [in Persian].

 

[3] Chen, R., & Tseng, H. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning system for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(4), .398–406.

 

[4] Filippova, T. (2015). Priority fields of e-learning development in Russia.  Procedia  Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20(6), 348 – 353.

 

 [5] Jafarpour, M., & Bahramzadeh, M. (2009). Evaluation of effective factors on the development of e-learning in universities of the country. Journal International Management Conference, Tehran, 7(4), 23-33.  [in Persian]

 

[6] Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (2007).  Ethical issues in qualitative e-learning research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 1–14.

 

[7] Gunn, H. (2008). Virtual libraries, supporting student learning. Journal of School Libraries Worldwide, 8, 27-37.

 

[8] Horton, W. (2011). E-learning by design. US: Pfeiffer.

 

[9] Attaran, M. (2006).  Virtual university: Revising existing narratives. Journal of Electronic Learning Zanjan, 11(4), 50-62. [in Persian].

 

[10] Javidan Najad, H., &  Sohali, R. (2003). Electronic education, need for organization in the 21st  century.

Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Information and Knowledge, 21(3), 30-1. [In Persian]

 

[11] Darab, B., &  &  Montazeri, G. (2010). Assess the readiness of e-learning in Iranian universities. Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 181-190.  [in Persian]

 

[12] Selim, H. (2007).  Critical success factor for e-learning acceptance. Computers & Education, 49(3), 396-413.

 

[13] Waleed,  M.,  Al-rahmi, M.,  Shahizan,  M. &  Lizawati, Y. (2015). The effectiveness of using e-learning in Malaysian higher education: A case study University Teknology Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 2.

 

[14] Bussakorn, C., & Praweenya, S. (2012). The eraroungchaisry, Critical success factors for online distance learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Creative Education, 3(6), 61-66.

 

[15] Chen, S., & Yong Tat Yao, A. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667-1671.

 

[16] Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Journal of Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.

 

[17] Mosakhani, M., & Jamporazmey, M. (2010).  Introduce critical success factors of e-learning for evaluating e-learning implementation success. International Conference on Educational and Information Technology, 6(1). 224-228.

 

[18] Seok, S., & Meyen, E. (2006).  Three dimensions of the online course evaluation instrument in postsecondary education. Proc. of the 9th LASTED International Conference Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, 4(6), 231-245.

 

[19] Mehregan, M., Jamporazmey, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Mehrafrouz, M. (2011).  Proposing an approach for evaluating e-learning by integrating critical success factor and fuzzy AHP. International Conference on Innovation, Management and Service IPEDR,  1(4), 125-130.

 

[20] Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009).  Multi- dimentional students evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computer & Education, 5(3).1285-1296.

 

[21] Hosseini, K., Nori, H., & Zabihi, A. (2013).  Adoption of e-learning higher education: Application of current theory, Technology Acceptance Model and quality of electronic service. Journal of research and planning in higher eduction, 6(7), 111-136. [in Persian].

 

[22] Nagunwa, T., & Lwoga, E. (2013).  Developing an e-learning strategy to implement medical competency based curricula: experiences from Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(3), 7-21.

 

[23] Hamidieh, A., & Mirzazadeh, A. (2015).  Prioritizing the performance evaluation indicators of the academic e-learning system using Fuzzy Approach. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(28). 1-10.

 

[24] Momeni, M., & Qayyami, A. (2005). Statistical analysis using SPSS. Tehran: New Book. [in Persian].

 

[25] Saaty, T. L.  (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. US: Mc-Graw Hill.

 

[26] Wallace, D., Joan, L., Giese, S., Jean, L., & Johnson, A. (2004).  Customer retailer loyalty in the context of multiple channel strategies. Journal of Retailing, 8(5).  249-263.

 

[27] Laarhoven, V., & Pedrycz, W. (1983).  A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241.

 

[28] Khorasani Kiasari, M., Abdollahzadeh, L., & rahmani, F. (2017). Evaluating and recoginizing the Effective Factors on Electronic faithfulness in companies offering electronic service using fuzzy Ahp logic. Journal of Industrial Management factory of Humanities,11(38), 35-48. [in Persian]

 

[29] Liu, C.,  Serrano, A., & Yin, G. (2011).  An optimum design selection approach for product customization development. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4),  1433-1443.

 

 [30] Albayrak, E., &  Erensal, Y. (2004).  Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance. An application of multiple criteria decision making problem, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15(3), .491-503.